Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:26:26.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research into practice: Written corrective feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2012

Icy Lee
Icy Lee*
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 108 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.2, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12.3, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 63.3, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics 31.2, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14.3, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2010). Reshaping the value of grammatical feedback on L2 writing using colors. Paper presented at the International TESOL Convention, March 2010, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Bruton, A. (2009). Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were . . . System 37.4, 600–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, J., Chodorow, M. & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service. AI Magazine 25.3, 27–36.Google Scholar
Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 9.1, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. (2000). The efficacy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing. Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, March 2000, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. (2004). A Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4, 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. (2009). Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 18.1, 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. & Robbins, M. (1976). Toward assessing interlanguage performance: The relationship between selected errors, learners' characteristics, and learners' expectations. Language Learning 26, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curriculum Development Council (1999). Syllabuses for secondary schools: English language Secondary 1–5. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.Google Scholar
El Ebyary, K. & Windeatt, S. (2010). The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36.3, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, N. M. & de Larios, J. R. (2010). The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M. & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 14.4, 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31.2, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 8.1, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (2001). Teaching writing for academic purposes. In Flowerdew, J. & Peacock, M. (eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime. . .?) Journal of Second Language Writing 13.1, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10.3, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantzen, D. & Rissell, D. (1987). Learner self-correction of written compositions. What does it show us? In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R. & Lee, J. F. (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, 92–107.Google Scholar
Hobbs, G. (2001). Academic journal publishing: Past, present and future. Journal of Education for Teaching 27.3, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal 66.2, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System 25.4, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.2, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2010). What about a feedback revolution in the writing classroom? Modern English Teacher 19.2, 46–49.Google Scholar
Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–139.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. & de Larios, J. R. (2010). Feedback in second language writing: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, i–xv.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10.1, 52–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20.1, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237–326.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y., Wright, D. & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37.4, 556–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1997). A problem and a non-problem for English learners. English Teaching and Learning 22.5, 59–67.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2010). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton's critique of the correction debate. System 38.4, 626–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.4, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies 10.2, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62.1, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19.1, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar