Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:52:24.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making connections through texts in language teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Richard Kern
Richard Kern*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Language is not just a tool for communication. It is also a resource for creative thought, a framework for understanding the world, a key to new knowledge and human history, and a source of pleasure and inspiration. The Connections Standard is about linking language and literature study to other disciplines (for example, art, music, film, history, among others) and about getting students to experience unique viewpoints available only through a particular language and its cultures. This presentation will argue for the importance of analyzing texts (written, oral, visual, audio-visual) in language teaching. The goal is to give students the chance to position themselves in relation to distinct viewpoints and distinct cultures and to make connections between language and other symbolic ways of making meaning, connections between language and other disciplines, and connections between language and culture. These connections are not easy to make, but they are essential if we are to prepare our students for the broadest range of language use and allow them to achieve their full communicative potential.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 367 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthes, R. ([1957]1972). Mythologies. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Brandelius, M. (1983). Le déjeuner des canotiers. Le Français dans le monde 23.179, 64–69.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Jurasek, R. (1993). Foreign languages across the curriculum: A case history from Earlham College and a generic rationale. In Krueger, M. & Ryan, F. (eds.), Language and content: Discipline- and content-based approaches to language study. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 85–102.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, 105–119.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal 90.2, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. (1985). Textual power: Literary theory and the teaching of English. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1992). Practical stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar