Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:08:55.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invited colloquium on negotiating the complexities of multilingual assessment, AAAL Conference 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2015

Kate Menken
Affiliation:
City University of New York – Queens College & Graduate [email protected]
Elana Shohamy
Affiliation:

Extract

The invited colloquium on New Directions in Language Assessment held at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) annual meeting in Portland, Oregon on March 22, 2014 brought together an international panel of scholars to together explore the possibilities and challenges of translanguaging and bi/multilingual approaches in assessment. Together, the presenters of this colloquium argued that allowing bi/multilinguals to demonstrate their knowledge and skills using their entire linguistic repertoire offers a promising new approach for teaching and assessment.

Type
Research in Progress
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal 95.3, 401417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O. & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P., Khamis, Z. & Olivero, F. (2011). Does English-medium instruction and examining lead to social and economic advantage? Promises and threats: A sub-Saharan case study. In Erling, E. & Seargeant, P. (eds.), English and international development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 111140.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal 95.3, 418429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar