Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:53:38.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactive alignment: A teaching-friendly view of second language pronunciation learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

Pavel Trofimovich
Pavel Trofimovich*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactive alignment is a phenomenon whereby interlocutors adopt and re-use each other's language patterns in the course of authentic interaction. According to the interactive alignment model, originally proposed by Pickering & Garrod (2004), this linguistic coordination is one way in which interlocutors achieve understanding in dialogue, occurring at the level of the lexicon, grammar, and pronunciation. The goal of this paper is to extend this model to second language (L2) pronunciation and to discuss its possible implications for L2 pronunciation teaching.

Type
Plenary Speech
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 411 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, D. (2011). A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition: How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T. & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 91, 169–188.Google Scholar
Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40, 177–189.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–34.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H. & Brennan, S. E. (1997). Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non-native speakers. Discourse Processes 23, 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75, B13–25.Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J. & McLean, J. F. (2010). Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 2355–2368.Google Scholar
Bremer, K. & Simonot, M. (1996). Joint negotiation of understanding: Procedures for managing problems of understanding. In Bremer, K., Roberts, C., Vasseur, M., Simonot, M. & Broeder, P. (eds.), Achieving understanding: Discourse in intercultural encounters. London: Longman, 181–206.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22, 1482–1493.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M. & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass 6, 259–278.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L. & Dalton, A. (2008). Mimicry: Its ubiquity, importance, and functionality. In Morsella, E., Bargh, J. & Gollwitzer, P. (eds.), Oxford handbook of human action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 458–483.Google Scholar
Churchill, E., Nishino, T., Okada, H. & Atkinson, D. (2010). Symbiotic gesture and the sociocognitive visibility of grammar. The Modern Language Journal 94, 234–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, C. M. & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 3647–3658.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Pickering, M. J. & Sorace, A. (2008). Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes 23, 528–556.Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R., Glover, J., Kaden, C., McGuire, M. & Scott, J. (2012). Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front round vowels in L1 English-L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research 28, 5–40.Google Scholar
Davis, P. & Rinvolucri, M. (1990). The confidence book: Building trust in the language classroom. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching 42, 476–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Y. (2007). Text memorization and imitation: The practices of successful Chinese learners of English. System 35, 271–280.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1991). The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 23–41.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 551–585.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 1011–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In Cole, J. & Hualde, J. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 353–380.Google Scholar
Fraser, H. (2004). Constraining abstractness: Phonological representation in the light of color terms. Cognitive Linguistics 15, 239–288.Google Scholar
Gambi, C. & Pickering, M. J. (2011). A cognitive architecture for the coordination of utterances. Frontiers in Psychology 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gambi, C. & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Prediction and imitation in speech. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S. & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27, 181–218.Google Scholar
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 292–304.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E. & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review 61, 325–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15, 87–105.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J. & Coupland, N. (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (2010). Visual and auditory input in second-language speech processing [Research Timeline]. Language Teaching 43, 84–95.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. & Sonchaeng, C. (2005). Theatre voice training and technology in teaching oral skills: Integrating the components of a speech event. System 33, 593–608.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Horton, W. S. & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology 2, 125–156.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G. & Dijkstra, T. (2010). Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 210–231.Google Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly 39, 369–377.Google Scholar
Levis, J. M. & Pickering, L. (2004). Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System 32, 505–524.Google Scholar
Lindemann, S. (2002). Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States. Language in Society 31, 419–441.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2002). The phonology of the L2 user. In. Cook, V. (ed.), Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 67–92.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The ‘like me’ hypothesis. In Hurley, S. & Chater, N. (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 55–77.Google Scholar
Miller, R. M., Sanchez, K. & Rosenblum, L. D. (2010). Alignment to visual speech information. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72, 1614–1625.Google Scholar
Mol, L., Krahmer, E., Maes, A. & Swerts, M. (2012). Adaptation in gesture: Converging hands or converging minds? Journal of Memory and Language 66, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. M. (2004). Attending to word-stress while learning new vocabulary. English for Specific Purposes 23, 67–83.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 39, 132–142.Google Scholar
Osburne, A. G. (2003). Pronunciation strategies of advanced ESOL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 41, 131–143.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 2382–2393.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R. & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40, 190–197.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., Hoshino, R., Hasbun, S. M., Sowemimo-Coker, C. & Krauss, R. M. (2013). Influence of role-switching on phonetic convergence in conversation. Discourse Processes 50, 276–300.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C. & Krauss, R. M. (2010). Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72, 2254–2264.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 169–226.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 329–392.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 46, 387–398.Google Scholar
Samuel, A. G. & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, Psychophysics 71, 1207–1218.Google Scholar
Shepard, C. A., Giles, H. & Le Poire, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In Robinson, W. P. & Giles, H. (eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology. New York: Wiley, 33–56.Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, A. & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning 55, 661–699.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning 62, 1231–1258.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M. (2005). Intention reading and imitative learning. In Hurley, S. & Chater, N. (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133–148.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: Implications for pronunciation instruction. The Modern Language Journal 90, 519–535.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Kennedy, S. (unpublished). Interactive alignment between non-native interlocutors: Evidence from two information-exchange tasks.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K. & Neumann, H. (2013). Using collaborative tasks to elicit auditory and structural priming. TESOL Quarterly 47, 177–186.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., McDonough, K. & Foote, J. (unpublished). Interactive alignment of multisyllabic stress patterns in a second language classroom.Google Scholar
Watterson, M. (2008). Repair of non-understanding in English in international communication. World Englishes 27, 378–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar