Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:46:19.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Input spacing in second language classroom settings: Replications of Bird (2010) and Serrano (2011)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2020

John Rogers Open the ORCID record for John Rogers [Opens in a new window]
John Rogers*
Affiliation:
English Language Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes the replication of Bird's (2010) and Serrano's (2011) studies, which examined distribution of practice effects in second language acquisition (SLA). These studies, which took place in authentic classroom contexts, produced conflicting results regarding the degree to which the learning of a second language (L2) benefited from distributed instruction. In the first part of the paper, I discuss the distribution of practice research in the learning and teaching of L2s. I then describe Bird's (2010) and Serrano's (2011) work, and highlight the strengths and limitations of the approaches of these studies. Finally, a number of approaches to approximate replications are suggested for each study in order to assess the reliability, internal validity, and generalizability of the original findings

Type
Replication Research
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 424 - 433
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. K. (2017). Spacing effects on learning and memory. In Wixted, J. T. & Byrne, J. H. (Eds.), Cognitive psychology of memory: Vol. 2. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (2nd ed., pp. 465–485). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, L., & White, J. (2011). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 106–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In Wixted, J. T. (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 487–514). Oxford, UK: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasprowicz, R., & Marsden, E. (2018). Towards ecological validity in research into input-based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form-meaning practice. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 886–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasprowicz, R. E., Marsden, E., & Sephton, N. (2019). Investigating distribution of practice effects for the learning of foreign language verb morphology in the young learner classroom. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 580–606.Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Harley, B. (1998). Case study of compact core French models: Attitudes and achievement. In Lapkin, S. (Ed.), French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp. 3–31). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Han, Z. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 563–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2019). Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom: It's about time. Language Teaching, 1–11. doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000454Google Scholar
Michel, M. C. (2017). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in L2 production. In Loewen, S. & Masatoshi, S. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 50–68). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, S. W. (2014). Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning. System, 42, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T., & Elgort, I. (2020). Effects of spacing on contextual vocabulary learning: Spacing facilitates the acquisition of explicit, but not tacit, vocabulary knowledge. Second Language Research. doi: 10.1177/0267658320927764.Google Scholar
Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y. (2019). Effects of massing and spacing on the learning of semantically related and unrelated words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T., Tada, S., Mclean, S., & Kim, Y. A. (2020). Effects of distributed retrieval practice over a semester: Cumulative tests as a way to facilitate second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication, 1–23.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2018). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L. III, Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In Mestre, J. & Ross, B. (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 1–36). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. (2015). Learning second language syntax under massed and distributed conditions. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 857–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. (2017). The spacing effect and its relevance to second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 906–911.Google Scholar
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2018). Input spacing and the learning of L2 vocabulary in a classroom context. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), doi: 10.1017/S0272263120000236.Google Scholar
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2020). Does it matter when you review? Input spacing, ecological validity, and the learning of L2 vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., & Leow, R. P. (2020). Toward greater empirical feasibility of the theoretical framework for systematic and deliberate L2 practice: Comments on Suzuki, Nakata, & DeKeyser (2019). Modern Language Journal, 104, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., & Révész, A. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 133–143). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rohrer, D. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 635–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruch, T. C. (1928). Factors influencing the relative economy of massed and distributed practice in learning. Psychological Review, 35(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R. (2012). Is intensive learning effective? Reflecting on the results from cognitive psychology and the second language acquisition literature. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 3–22). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., & Huang, H–Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text? TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 971–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. (2005). Conditions and challenges in developing school-based SLA research programs. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. (2015). SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language Teaching, 48(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL programmes in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y. (2017). The optimal distribution of practice for the acquisition of L2 morphology: A conceptual replication and extension. Language Learning, 67(3), 512–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Effects of distributed practice on the proceduralization of morphology. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The desirable difficulty framework as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice. Modern Language Journal, 103, 713–720.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2020). Empirical feasibility of the desirable difficulty framework: Toward more systematic research on L2 practice for broader pedagogical implications. Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, E. (2014). About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60, 113–189. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, J., & Turner, C. (2005). Comparing children's oral ability in two ESL programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(4), 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar