Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:27:20.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distance learning of foreign languages: A research agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Cynthia White
Cynthia White*
Affiliation:
Massey University, New [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research into the distance learning of languages is now established as a significant avenue of enquiry in language teaching, with evident research trajectories in several domains. This article selects and analyses significant areas of investigation in distance language learning and teaching to identify new and emerging gaps, along with research questions, methodologies and research tools. Taken together these define a research agenda focusing on theory, pedagogy, technology use, learner contributions, innovation and less commonly taught languages. Within those broad areas, the scope of proposed research tasks includes the distinctive features and practices of distance language teaching, task design for synchronous settings, mentoring, multimodal learning environments, the transfer of speaking skills, and learners’ affective experiences. To conclude, a number of guidelines are given for future enquiry addressing the distinctive nature of research into distance language teaching and learning and the need for a rich evidence base in both theory and practice.

Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 538 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, I. & Qian, K. (2013). Supporting intercultural learning for beginners’ Chinese language learners at the Open University, UK. In Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (eds.), Researching intercultural learning: Investigations in language and education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, M. S. & Bunker, E. L. (2009). A model for self-regulated distance language learning. Distance Education 30.1, 47–61.Google Scholar
Arispe, K. & Blake, R. J. (2012). Individual factors and successful learning in a hybrid course. System 40.4, 449–465.Google Scholar
Arnó-Macià, E. (2012). The role of technology in teaching languages for specific purposes courses. The Modern Language Journal 96.1, 89–104.Google Scholar
Baumann, U., Shelley, M. & Murphy, L. (2009). New challenges, the role of the tutor in the teaching of languages at a distance. Distances et Savoirs 6.3, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, T. Ö. (2009). Multimodal student interaction online: An ecological perspective. Recall 21.2, 186–205.Google Scholar
Bertin, J.-C., Grave, P. & Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2010). Second language distance learning and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and didactic ergonomics. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M. & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology 12.3, 114–127.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal 22.3, 497–511.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2007). New trends in using technology in the language curriculum. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27, 76–97.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2009). The use of technology for second language distance learning. The Modern Language Journal 93.1, 822–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2011). Current trends in online language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning: Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. & Shiri, S. (2012). Online Arabic language learning: What happens after? L2 Journal 4.2, 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. A. & Furnborough, C. (2010). Learner characteristics and learning outcomes on a distance Spanish course for beginners. System 38.1, 14–29.Google Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A., de los Arcos, B. & Mardomingo, R. (2012). Virtual learning environments (VLEs) for distance language learning: Shifting tutor roles in a contested space for interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning 25.2, 129–143.Google Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A., Mardomingo, R. & Valentine, C. (2009). Mobile blogs in language learning: Making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL 21.1, 96–112.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an Activity Theory perspective. In Lantolf, I. & Appel, G. (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Westport, CT: Ablex, 173–193.Google Scholar
de los Arcos, B., Coleman, J. A. & Hampel, R. (2009). Learners’ anxiety in audiographic conferences: A discursive psychology approach to emotion talk. ReCALL 21.1, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demouy, V. & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning 25.3, 217–232.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M. & Panichi, L. (2009). Talking into empty space? Signalling involvement in a virtual language classroom in Second Life. Language Awareness 18.3–4, 310–328.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L. & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in second life: A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL 21.2, 206–226.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning 59.1, 230–248.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction 5.4, 319–336.Google Scholar
Ernest, P., Heiser, S. & Murphy, L. (2013). Developing teacher skills to support collaborative online language learning. Language Learning Journal 41.1, 37–54.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20.5, 409–442.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Hauck, M. & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology 16.3, 82–102.Google Scholar
Furnborough, C. (2012). Making the most of others: Autonomous interdependence in adult beginner distance language learners. Distance Education, 33.1, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. K. & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology 36.1, 5–18.Google Scholar
Glikman, V. (2002). Des cours par correspondance au e-learning: panorama des formations ouvertes et à distance. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, R. (2007). Rethinking educational technologies in the age of social media: From ‘tools for interaction’ to ‘sites of practice’. Presented at the Keynote presentation for Echanger Pour Apprendre en Ligne (EPAL) conference, Université Stendhal, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A. & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL 25.2, 1–32.Google Scholar
Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL 21.2, 166–185.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL 18.1, 105–121.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2009). Training teachers for the multimedia age: Developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 3.1, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. & de los Arcos, B. (2013). Interacting at a distance: A critical review of the role of ICT in developing the learner–context interface in a university language programme. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 7.2, 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18.4, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL 24.2, 116–137.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. & Youngs, B. L. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21.2, 87–124.Google Scholar
Heins, B., Duensing, A., Stickler, U. & Batstone, C. (2007). Spoken interaction in online and face-to-face language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20.3, 279–295.Google Scholar
Holmberg, B. (1995). The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open Learning 10.2, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. (2010). Distance language learners’ perceptions of assessed, student-led speaking tasks via a synchronous audiographic conferencing tool. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 4.3, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J., Gibson, W., Ros i Solé, C., Savvides, N. & Starkey, H. (2008). Interaction and critical inquiry in asynchronous computer‐mediated conferencing: A research agenda. Open Learning 23.1, 29–42.Google Scholar
Hurd, S. (2007a). Anxiety and non-anxiety in a distance language learning environment: The distance factor as a modifying influence. System 35.4, 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, S. (2007b). Distant voices: Learners’ stories about the affective side of learning a language at a distance. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1.2, 242–259.Google Scholar
Hurd, S. & Xiao, J. (2006). Open and distance language learning at the Shantou Radio and TV University, China, and the Open University, United Kingdom: A cross‐cultural perspective. Open Learning 21.3, 205–219.Google Scholar
Hurd, S. & Xiao, J.. (2010). Anxiety and affective control among distance language learners in China and the UK. RELC Journal 41.2, 183–200.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Charting unknown territory: Models of participation in mobile language learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4.2, 116–129.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 20.3, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafford, B. A. (2009). Toward an ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991). The Modern Language Journal 93.1, 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, M.-N. (2013). Distance CALL Online. In Thomas, M., Reinders, H. & Warschauer, M. (eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London: Continuum, 141–158.Google Scholar
Lamy, M.-N. & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal 93.1, 769–782.Google Scholar
Madyarov, I. (2009). Designing a workable framework for evaluating distance language instruction. CALICO Journal 26.2, 290–308.Google Scholar
Mangenot, F. & Nissen, E. (2006). Collective activity and tutor involvement in e-learning environments for language teachers and learners. CALICO Journal 23.3, 601–622.Google Scholar
Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker-VanStrander, S., Tseng, C.-H. & You, J. (2006). Expert-novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. Teacher education in CALL (Language Learning and Language Teaching 14), 283–291.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. (2008). Supporting learner autonomy: Developing practice through the production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 12.1, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. (2011). Autonomy and context: A tale of two learners. In Gardner, D. (ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning. Gaziantep, Turkey: Faculty of Education, Zirve University, 17–26.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. & Hurd, S. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy and motivation in blended teaching. In Nicolson, M., Murphy, L. & Southgate, M. (eds.), Language teaching in blended contexts. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press, 43–56.Google Scholar
Murphy, L., Shelley, M. & Baumann, U. (2010). Qualities of effective tutors in distance language teaching: Student perceptions. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 4.2, 119–136.Google Scholar
Murphy, L., Shelley, M., White, C. & Baumann, U. (2006). Language teaching at a distance: Establishing key principles to develop professional practice. Proceedings of the Crossing Frontiers: Languages and the International Dimension Conference, Cardiff University, 6–7 July 2006.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1989). Toward a collaborative approach to curriculum development: A case study. TESOL Quarterly 23.1, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orland-Barak, L. (2002). What's in a case?: What mentors’ cases reveal about the practice of mentoring. Journal of Curriculum Studies 34.4, 451–468.Google Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pichette, F. (2009). Second language anxiety and distance language learning. Foreign Language Annals 42.1, 77–93.Google Scholar
Qian, K. & McCormick, R. (2014). Building course cohesion: The use of online forums in distance Chinese language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27.1, 44–69.Google Scholar
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2005). Task design for audiographic conferencing: Promoting beginner oral interaction in distance language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18.5, 417–442.Google Scholar
Shelley, M., Murphy, L. & White, C. J. (2013). Language teacher development in a narrative frame: The transition from classroom to distance and blended settings. System 41.3, 560–574.Google Scholar
Shelley, M., White, C., Baumann, U. & Murphy, L. (2006). ‘It's a unique role!’ Perspectives on tutor attributes and expertise in distance language teaching. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 7.2, 1–15.Google Scholar
Stickler, U. & Emke, M. (2011). LITERALIA: Towards developing intercultural maturity online. Language Learning & Technology 15.1, 147–168.Google Scholar
Stickler, U. & Hampel, R. (2007). Designing online tutor training for language courses: A case study. Open Learning 22.1, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U. & Shi, L. (2013). Supporting Chinese speaking skills online. System 41.1, 50–69.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A. & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal 25.3, 528–546.Google Scholar
Tasker, I. (2010). Intermediate distance learners of Chinese look back: A survey study. In Everson, M. & Shen, H. (eds.), Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language (Vol. 4). Mānoa, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai‘i, 153–177.Google Scholar
Ulitsky, H. (2000). Language learner strategies with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22.3, 285–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 215–228.Google Scholar
vom Brocke, J., White, C., Walker, U. & Vom Brocke, C. (2010). Making user-generated content communities work in higher education: The importance of setting incentives. In Ulf-Daniel, E. & Schneckenberg, D. (eds.), Changing cultures in higher education. Berlin: Springer, 149–166.Google Scholar
Vorobel, O. & Kim, D. (2012). Language teaching at a distance: An overview of research. CALICO Journal 29.3, 548–562.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Chen, N. S. (2009). Criteria for evaluating synchronous learning management systems: Arguments from the distance language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22.1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Chen, N. S. (2013). Engendering interaction, collaboration, and reflection in the design of online learning assessment in language learning: A reflection from the course designers. In , B. Zou, Xing, M., Xiang, C., Wang, Y. & Sun, M. (eds.), Computer-assisted foreign language teaching and learning: Technological advances. Hershey, PA: Information Sciences Reference, 16–38.Google Scholar
Waters, A. (2014). Managing innovation in English language education: A research agenda. Language Teaching 48.1, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System 27.4, 443–457.Google Scholar
White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. (2005). Towards a learner-based theory of distance language learning: The concept of the learner–context interface. In Holmberg, B., Shelley, M. & White, C. (eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 55–71.Google Scholar
White, C. (2006). The distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching 39.4, 247–264.Google Scholar
White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: An overview. In Lewis, T. & Hurd, S. (eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 3–24.Google Scholar
White, C. (2011). Inside independent learning: Old and new perspectives. In Morrison, B. (ed.), Independent language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 14–23.Google Scholar
White, C., Schramm, K. & Chamot, A. (2007). Research methods in strategy research: Re-examining the toolbox. In Cohen, A. D. & Macaro, E. (eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–116.Google Scholar
Xiao, J. (2008). Teaching English at a distance in China's Radio and Television Universities. Open Learning 23.3, 171–183.Google Scholar
Xiao, J. (2012a). Tutors’ influence on distance language students’ learning motivation: Voices from learners and tutors. Distance Education 33.3, 365–380.Google Scholar
Xiao, J. (2012b). Successful and unsuccessful distance language learners: An ‘affective’ perspective. Open Learning 27.2, 121–136.Google Scholar
Xiao, J. & Hurd, S. (2010). Motivation and beliefs in distance language learning: The case of English learners at SRTVU, an open university in China. Journal of Asia TEFL 7.3, 59–91.Google Scholar
Xiao, J. & Zhao, C. (2011). Distance ELT tutors in China's radio and television universities: Professional development. Open Learning 26.1, 51–66.Google Scholar
Yan, J. X. & Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Learners’ perceptions of how anxiety interacts with personal and instructional factors to influence their achievement in English: A qualitative analysis of EFL learners in China. Language Learning 58.1, 151–183.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. & Cui, G. (2010). Learning beliefs of distance foreign language learners in China: A survey study. System 38.1, 30–40.Google Scholar