Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:09:37.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crosslinguistic influence and L2 grammar learning: Proposed replications of Ellis and Sagarra (2011) and Tolentino and Tokowicz (2014)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2020

Kevin McManus
Kevin McManus*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations of crosslinguistic effects in second language acquisition (SLA) have contributed rich understandings about the ways in which prior language knowledge and experience can influence additional language learning. Building on this work, one recent line of research has examined the extent to which SLA findings about crosslinguistic influence can be used to improve L2 learning, indicating that explicit instruction tailored to address the nature of the crosslinguistic learning problem can benefit L2 performance. At the same time, however, this line of inquiry is relatively novel and under-researched. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to suggest further research which might advance knowledge and understanding about the ways in which explicit instruction can facilitate second language (L2) learning of crosslinguistically difficult target features. To this end, I lay the ground for a series of close replications designed to understand the role of prior language knowledge and experience in L2 learning: Ellis and Sagarra (2011) and Tolentino and Tokowicz (2014). These studies were selected because they are grounded in empirical SLA research and SLA theory. In addition, the selected studies facilitate replication because they have either (i) made their data collection materials available in digital repositories or (ii) have robustly described their design and provided the stimuli used.

Type
Replication Research
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 565 - 573
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberson, C. L. (2019). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, R. (2016). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52(1), 43–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Prieto Botana, G. (2015). The effectiveness of processing instruction in L2 grammar acquisition: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D. (2019). Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 553–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned Attention in adult language acquisition: A replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 589–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, M., White, J., & Bell, P. (2010). First and second language knowledge in the language classroom. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. (2005). Les contextes prototypiques et marqués de l'emploi de l'imparfait par l'apprenant du français langue étrangère [The prototypical and marked contexts of Imperfect use by the advanced learner of French]. In Labeau, E. & Larrivée, P. (Eds.), Nouveaux développements de l'imparfait [New developments of the Imperfect], (pp. 175–197). New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlstedt, M. (2015). Acquisition of the imparfait in L2 French in adults and children: The same or different? A comparative case study of Swedish adults and children in an immersion setting. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 6(1), 74–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The revised hierarchical model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45(6), 812–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015a). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, London: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015b). The roles of attention and (un)awareness in SLA: Conceptual replication of N. C. Ellis & Sagarra (2010a) and Leung & Williams (2012). Language Teaching, 48(1), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2019). Harnessing web-based contrastive instruction to address English relative clause accuracy and subject-object asymmetry. System, 85, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, Judith F. & De Groot, Annette M. B. Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 69–84). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, K. (2013). Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the Aspect Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51(3), 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. (2015). L1-L2 Differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(2), 155–181.Google Scholar
McManus, K. (2019). Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning. Language Awareness, 28(2), 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of language-switching practice for reducing cross-language competition in L2 grammatical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–18.Google Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2017). L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 459–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2018). Online and offline effects of L1 practice in L2 grammar learning: A partial replication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019a). Signatures of automaticity during practice: Explicit instruction about L1 processing routines can improve L2 grammatical processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019b). Using explicit instruction about L1 to reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammar learning: Evidence from oral production in L2 French. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning (5. pr). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. K., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Liszka, S. A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4), 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N. (2015). The effectiveness of processing instruction and production-based instruction on L2 grammar acquisition: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & White, J. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. In Housen, A. (Ed.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 199–234). Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. M. (2019). Using judgments in second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Cross-language similarity modulates effectiveness of second language grammar instruction: L2 instruction and cross-language similarity. Language Learning, 64(2), 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. New York, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The Instructed learning of form-function mappings in the English article system. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar