Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 55–9.Google Scholar

Also in Layer, & Hutcheson, (1972), 64–70.Google Scholar

Ahlgren, P. (1978). Tilltalsordet ni. Dess semantik och användning i historiskt perspektiv. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Allwood, J. (1976). Linguistic communication as action and cooperation. A study in pragmatics. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 2. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Amonosova, N. N. (1968). Anglijskaja kontekstologija. Leningrad.Google Scholar

Arndt, H. (1978). Deterrninanten sprachlicher Interaktion: Gruppen - und Interaktionstypen. Die neueren Sprachen, 77. 27 Neule Folge, 300–25.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variation in linguistic theory. Washington: Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bailey, C..J. N. (1974). Contributions of the study of variation to the framework of the new linguistics. Linguistische Berichte, 29, 1–10.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (1973). New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, San Francisco & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. & Benigni, L. (1975). Rules of address in Italy: a sociological survey. Language in Society, 4, 271–88.Google Scholar

Bayer, K. (1977). Sprechen und Situation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Beneš, E. & Vachek, J. (eds.) (1971). Stilistik und Soziolinguistik. Beiträge der Prager Schule zur strukturellen Sprachbetrachtung und Spracherziehung. Munich: List.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1971–1973). Class, codes and control, I-II. Primary Socialization, Language and Education, IV. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Berry, M. (1975–1977). Introduction to systemic linguistics, I-II. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1973). The chimaera of context. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 5/6, 1–21.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1973). Kinesics and context. Essays on body-motion communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1975). Language (revised ed.).London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M. & de, Haan D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men: on the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar

Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of powerand solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A (1960), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 253–76.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. P. (1960). Vectors of prose style. In Sebeok, T. A. (1960), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 283–92.Google Scholar

Cole, P. (ed.) (1978). Syntax and semantics, 9. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) (1975). Syntax and semantics, 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. (1955–1956). Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas da una lingüistica del hablar. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 7, 29–54. Reprinted in Coseriu (1962), 282–323.Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. (1962). Teoria del lenguaje y lingüistica general. Biblioteca romámica hispánica, 11. Estudios y essayos 61. Madrid.Google Scholar

Crosby, F. & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 313–22.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. & Quirk, C. R. (1964). Systems of prosodic and paralinguistic features in English. Janua Linguarum series minor, 39. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. London: LongmansGoogle Scholar

van, Dijk T. A. (1977 a). Text and context: some explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

van, Dijk T. A. (1977 b). Context and cognition: knowledge frames and speech act comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 211–32.Google Scholar

van, Dijk T. A. (ed.) (1976). Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Dubský, J. (1972). The Prague conception of functional style. In Fried (1972), 112–27.Google Scholar

Ducrot, O. & Todorov, T. (1972). Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Edelsky, C. (1979). Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society, 8, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, P. (1968). Meaning and context: an exercise in practical stylistics. English Language Teaching, 22, 272–7.Google Scholar

Elllegard, A. (1962). A statistical method for determining authorship. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1964). On defining style. In Enkvist et al. (1964), 3–56.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E., Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. (1964). Linguistics and style. Language and Language Learning, 6. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1973). Linguistic stylistics. Janua Linguarum series critica 5. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society, 5, 137–51.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. (1968). Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Fleischer, W. (1970). Grundfragen der Stilklassifikation unter funktionalen Aspekt. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Pädagogischen Hochschule ‘Dr Theodor Neubauer’ Erfurt Mühlhausen. Gesellschaft- und spachwissenschaftliche Reihe 7, 2, 23–28.Google Scholar

Freihoff, R. & Takala, S. (1974). Kielenkäyttötilanteiden esittelyyn perustuva kielenopetuksen tavoitekuvausjärjestelmä. [A system of goal description for language teaching based on presentations of situations of language use.] Reports from the Language Centre, University of Jyväskylä, number 2, separate English summary in number 3, German summary in number 4.Google Scholar

Fried, V. (1972). The Prague School of linguistics and language teaching. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, P. (1972). Social context and semantic feature: the Russian pronominal usage. In Gumperz & Hymes (1972), 270–300.Google Scholar

Gal'perin, I. R. (1971). Stylistics. Moscow: Higher School Publishing House.Google Scholar

Gardiner, Sir A. H. (1932). The theory of speech and language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1968). Linguistic etiquette. In Fishman (1968), 282–95.Google Scholar

Giglioli, P. P. (ed.) (1972). Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Gläser, R. (1969). Linguistische Kriterien der Stilbeschreibung. Typescript of Habilitationsschrift, Leipzig: Karl-Marx-Universität, Sektion Theoretische und angewandte Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Goody, E. N. (ed). (1978). Questions of politeness. Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177–98.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. & Carroll, S. (1978). Language and situation. Language varieties and their social contexts. London, etc.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole & Morgan (1975), 41–58.Google Scholar

Grimes, J. (1975). The thread of discourse. Janua Linguarum Series minor 207. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, etc.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). System and function in language: selected papers. Kress, G., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, L. (1966). Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlaeggetse. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Holcroft, D. (1978). Words and deeds. Problems in the theory of speech acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1964). Language in culture and society. A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1967). Models of interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. (1977). Foundations in sociolinguistics. An ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Johannisson, T. (1973). Ett sprakligt signalement. English summary: ‘A linguistic signalement’. Nordistica Gothoburgensia 6. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Gothenburg: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Joos, M. (1962). The five clocks. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kirstein, B. (1975). Toward a situational grammar. Linguistische Berichte, 39, 28–38.Google Scholar

Kitaxova, Z. Ju & Kitaxov, K. (1978). Problemy klassifikacij funtcional'nyx stilej v jazykax različnyx tipov. [On the problem of classifying functional styles in languages of different types.] Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1, 3–17.Google Scholar

Kolšanskij, G. V. (1959). O prirode konteksta. [About the nature of context.] Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 47–9.Google Scholar

Kožina, M. (1968). K osnovanijam functional'noj stilistiki. [Towards the foundations of functional stylistics.] Perm': Universitet im. A.M. Gor'kogo.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar

Also in Giglioli, (1972), 283–308 and in Pride & Holmes (1972), 180–202.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). The isolation of contextual styles. In Labov, (1972), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 45–80.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. E. & Tucker, G. R. (1976). Tu, vous, usted: a social-psychological study of address patterns. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Langendoen, D. T. (1968). The London School of linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Layer, J. & Hutcheson, S. (eds.) (1972). Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Leodolter, R. (1975). Die Kategorie der ‘Sprechsituation’: Zur soziolinguistischen Theoriebildung (Zusammenfassung). Grazer Linguistische Studien, 1, 142–49.Google Scholar

Lock, A. (ed.) (1978). Action, gesture and symbol. The emergence of language. London, New York and San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Longacre, R. E. (1976). An anatomy of speech notions. Amsterdam: de Ridder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackey, W. F. (1978). Pragmalinguistica in context. Die neueren Sprachen, 77.27 Neue Folge, 194–223.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (ed.) (1978). The social context of language. Chichester and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. F. (1975). Principles of Firthian linguistics. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Moerk, E. L. (1970). Quantitative analysis of writing styles. Journal of Linguistics, 6, 223–30.Google Scholar

Moles, A. A. & Rohmer, E. (1977). Théorie des actes. Vers une écologic des actions. Tournai: Casterman.Google Scholar

Mosteller, F. & Wallace, D. L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: the federalist papers. Reading, Mass.: Addison & Wesley.Google Scholar

Müller, R. M. (1970). Situation und Lehrbuchtexte: die Kontextualisierbarkeitsprobe. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 17, 3, 229–42.Google Scholar

Müller, R. M. (1971). Was ist ‘situational teaching’: em Vorschlag zur Systematiaierung. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 18, 229–39.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, B. (1970). An analysis of prose style to determine authorship. “The O'Ruddy”, a novel by Stephen Crane and Robert Barr. Studies in General and Comparative Literature, IV. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Okaaar, E. (1974). Sprache und Denken. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 1, 317–30.Google Scholar

Osgood, C. A., Suci, G. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Paulston, C. B. (1975). Language and social class: pronouns of address in Swedish. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, 29, 1–19.Google Scholar

Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Janus Linguarum series maior, 24. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds.) (1972). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Rasper, Chr., Rudigkeit, R., Schäfer, G. & Wenner, D. (1978). Die Beziehung zwischen Turn-Taking Verhalten und sozialem Rang. Linguistische Berichte, 56, 1–22.Google Scholar

Riffaterre, M. (1971). Essais de stylistique structurale. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Rozkovcová, L. (1973). On theories of Context in linguistics. Philologia Pragensia, 16, 94–106.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1975). A simplest systematics for turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. M. (1974). Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Šajkevič, A. Ja (1968). Opyt statističeskogo vydelenija funkcional'nyx stilej. [An attempt at statistical determination of functional styles.] Voprosy jazykoznanja, 1, 64–76.Google Scholar

Sandig, B. (1970). Probleme einer linguistischen Stilistik. Linguistik und Didaktik, 1, 3, 177–94.Google Scholar

Sandig, B. (1978). Stilistik. Sprachpragmatische Grundlegung der Stilbeschreibung. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sankoff, D. (ed.) (1978). Linguistic variation. Models and methods. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schaar, C. (1978). Linear sequence, spatial structure, complex sign, and vertical context system. Poetics, 7, 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.Google Scholar

Scherfer, P. (1976). Über funktionale Varietäten des Französischen. Linguistische Berichte, 46, 1–15.Google Scholar

Searle, J. A. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. A. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–23.Google Scholar

Shotter, J. (1978). The cultural context of communication studies: theoretical and methodological issues.Google Scholar

In Lock, (1978), 43–78.Google Scholar

Sievert, H.-J. (1976). Zum Gebrauch von Anredeformen: Gruss- und Verabschiedungsformeln in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart in der DDR. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 13, 297–300.Google Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1961). Langage et contexte. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1967). Sur lea rapports entre la stylistique et la psycholinguistique. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 12, 4, 309–30.Google Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1977). Convergent and divergent aspects of psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics. In Uribe-Villegas (1977), 169–95.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. & Gregory, M. (1964). An approach to the study of style.Google Scholar

In Enkvist, et al. (1964), 59–105.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. C. (1970). Pragmatics. Synthese, 22, 272–89.Google Scholar

Svartvik, J. (1968). The Evans statements. A case for forensic linguistics. Gothenburg Studies in English 20. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. V. (1975). A schema for the contextual study of language. Linguistics, 164, 45–61.Google Scholar

Trojan, F. (1952). Der Ausdruck der Sprachstimme. Vienna and Düsseldorf: Maudrich.Google Scholar

Trojanskaja, E. S. (1979). Aktual'nye problemy issledovanija funkcional'nyx stilej. [Topical problems in the study of functional styles.] InCvilling, M. Ja. et al. (eds.), Lingvostilističeskie issledovanija naučnoj reči. Moscow: lzdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar

Ure, J. (1969). Practical registers. English Language Teaching, 23, 107–14 and 206–15.Google Scholar

Ure, J. & Ellis, J. (1977). Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. In Uribe-Villegas (1977), 197–243.Google Scholar

Uribe-Villegas, O. (ed.) (1977). Issues in sociolinguistics: contributions to the sociology of language. The Hague, Paris and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar

Vachek, J. & Dubský, J. (1966). Dictionnaire linguistique de l'École de Prague. Utrecht and Anvers: Spectrum Publishers.Google Scholar

Verschueren, J. (1978). Pragmatics: an annotated bibliography with particular reference to speech act theory. Library and Information Sources in Linguistics, 4. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Verschueren, J. (1978–1979). Pragmatics: an annotated bibliography. Part 1, Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 373–400.Google Scholar

Part III, Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 99–125.Google Scholar

Voegelin, C. F., Yamamoto, F. Y., A. Y., and F. M., (1977). Presuppositional culture spaces. Anthropological Linguistics, 19, 320–53.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, D. (ed.) (1976 a). Linguistische Pragmatik, 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, D. (1976 b). Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Yaguello, M. (1978). Les mots et les femmes. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar