Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:39:35.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of quality management in language education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Frank Heyworth
Frank Heyworth*
Affiliation:
EAQUALS and European Centre for Modern Languages, Graz, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This review examines applications of quality management (QM) in language education. QM approaches have been adapted from methodologies developed in industrial and commercial settings, and these are briefly described. Key aspects of QM in language education are the definition of purpose, descriptions of principles and practice, including various descriptive frameworks, and the place of reflective practice and action research. Quality descriptions for different aspects of language teaching – examinations and assessment, education for migrants, for young learners, in mainstream education – are summarised. There is an account of accreditation and recognition of language teaching institutions and a critical review of some of the contradictions and conflicts in the QM approach, such as those between accountability and trust, and between creativity and standardisation. The strengths and weaknesses of auditing and quality inspection methods are examined.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 281 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalto, E., Abel, A., Atanasoska, T., Boeckmann, K.-B. & Lamb, T. (2011). Promoting plurilingualism: Majority language in multilingual settings. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
ACCET (Accrediting Council for Continuous Education and Training). A partnership for quality. www.accet.orgGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulo, D. & Katsos, N. (2011). How bi-lingual children learn. Presentation at International School of Geneva, November 2011.Google Scholar
Aloyo, E. (2011). R2P, NGOs, and ideas of legitimacy in international relations. http://eamonaloyo.wordpress.com/research/Google Scholar
ALTE (for the Council of Europe) (2009). Manual for language test development and examining. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/ManualtLangageTest-Alte2011_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
ACTFL (American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages) (2005). National standards for foreign language education. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3392.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bartolomé, L. (2002). Creating an equal playing field: Teachers as advocates, border crossers, and cultural brokers. In Beykont, Z. F. (ed.), The power of culture: Teaching across language difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group, 167–191.Google Scholar
Beacco, J. C. & Byram, M. (2007). From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education: Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. Language Policy Division, Council of Europe: Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2007). Language acquisition and bilingualism for a multilingual society. Applied Psycholinguistics 28.3, 393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böttcher, W., Bos, W., Döbert, H. & Holtappels, H.-G. (eds.) (2008). Bildungsmonitoring und Bildungscontrolling in nationaler und internationaler Perspektive. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
British Council (2012). Accreditation UK. www.britishcouncil.org/accreditation.htmGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Heyworth, F. (1999). Modern languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. A common European framework of reference. A user guide for quality assurance and quality control. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/publications_EN.asp?#P108_3512Google Scholar
Cambridge ESOL (2012). Benchmarking System. www.cambridgeesol.org/about/standards/benchmarking.htmlGoogle Scholar
Candelier, M., de Pietro, J. F., Facciol, R., Lorincz, I., Pascual, X. & Schröder-Sura, A. (2011). CARAP-FREPA: A framework of reference for pluralistic approaches to languages and cultures. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. C. & Tam, W. M. (1997). Multi-models of quality. Quality Assurance in Education 5.1, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coste, D., Courtilion, J., Ferenczi, V., Martins-Baltar, M. & Papo, E. (1983). Un niveau-seuil. Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar
Costello, F. (2007) The Irish approach. In Weber, L. & Dolgova-Dreyer, K. (eds.), 91–107.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg, Language Policy Division: Council of Europe & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2011). Languages in education, languages for education. A platform of resources and references for plurilingual and intercultural education. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/langeduc/LE_PlatformIntro_en.aspGoogle Scholar
CQAF (Common Quality Assurance Framework) (2010). http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/qualitynet/cqaf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debaene, E. (2010). The school as a socialising space in interethnic relationships, selected stories of mainstream school experience for Polish migrants. In Komorowska, H. & Aleksandrowicz-Pedich, L. (eds.), Coping with diversity: Language and culture education. Academica: Warsaw, 105–123.Google Scholar
Deming, W. Edwards (1986). Out of the crisis. Boston, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Training, West Australia (2004). Competency framework for teachers. Perth, Australia: Department of Education and Training. www.det.wa.edu.au.Google Scholar
EAQUALS (Evaluation and Accreditation of Quality in Language Services) (2010). A Guide to inspections, version 6.2, www.eaquals.org.Google Scholar
EAQUALS (2012). EAQUALS framework for teacher training and development. www.eaquals.org.Google Scholar
ECML (European Centre for Modern Languages) (2011). Promoting inclusive, plurilingual and intercultural education. Call for submissions for the ECML program of activities. Graz, Austria: ECML.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012). European Language Label. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/european-language-label/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
European University Association (2007). Europe's universities beyond 2010: Diversity with a common purpose. Brussels: European University Association.Google Scholar
Erickson, G. & Figueras, N. (2011). Guidelines for good practice in language testing and assessment: Large scale dissemination days. www.ealta.eu.org/documents/archive/GGP_dissemination_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Farmer, F. (2006). Accountable professional practice in ELT. ELT Journal 60.2, 120–130. http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/2/160.full.pdf+htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1961). Total quality control. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fenner, A. B. & Newby, D. (2009). Approaches to materials design in European textbooks: Implementing principles of authenticity, learner autonomy and cultural awareness. Strasbourg:Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. G. (1993) Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership 50.6, 12. www.michaelfullan.ca/media/13396031680.pdfGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M. & Nguyen, D. (2007). Assessment and accountability in language education programs. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.Google Scholar
Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and evaluation in higher education 18.1, 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, E. (1987). Awareness of language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heyworth, F. (2003). The organisation of innovation in language education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Hu, G. (2002). Recent important developments in secondary English-language teaching in the People's Republic of China. Language, Culture and Curriculum 15. 1, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, S. (2007). The identification of quality indicators in English Language Teaching: A study in compulsory and non-compulsory language education in the Province of Granada. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Granada.Google Scholar
IFCES (International Forum for the Certification of Educational Services) (2012). www.ifces.org/about.htmlGoogle Scholar
ISO (2008). Quality management systems: Requirements. Edition 4. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. www.iso.org/iso/home.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. (2012). Language skills. Interview in The Parliament.com. www.theparliament.com/latest-news/article/newsarticle/language-skills-neil-jones/#.UH0s94azF0MGoogle Scholar
Juran, J. (1951). Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Karavas-Doukas, K. (1998). Evaluating the implementation of educational innovations: Lessons from the past. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Germaine, K. (eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching. London: Longman, 25–51.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. & Grenfell, M. (2005). European profile for teacher education. A frame of reference. Southampton: University of Southampton. www.lang.soton.ac.uk/profileGoogle Scholar
Kettemann, B., de Cillia, R. & Haller, M. (2001). Innovation im Fremdsprachenunterricht – am Beispiel der im Rahmen der Aktion “Europasiegel für innovative Sprachenprojekte” in Österreich von 1998–2000 eingereichten Projekte. Graz: Österreichisches Sprachen-Kompetenz-Zentrum.Google Scholar
Kohler, J. (2007). The implications for governance of institutions and systems. In Weber, L. & Dolgova-Dreyer, K. (eds.), The legitimacy of quality assurance in Higher Education. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, 59–75.Google Scholar
Kok, W. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Komorowska, H. (2011). Paradigms in language teacher education. In Komorowska, H. (ed.), Issues in promoting multilingualism: Teaching, Learning, Assessment. Warsaw: FRSE, 13–39.Google Scholar
Komorowska, H. & Aleksandrowicz-Pedich, L. (eds.) (2010). Coping with diversity: Language and culture education. Warsaw: Academica.Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. (2005). Bildungsstandards als Instrumente der Qualitätsentwicklung im Fremdsprachenunterricht: Towards a checklist approach to foreign language learning and teaching? In Bausch, K.-R., Burwitz-Melzer, E., Königs, F. G. & Krumm, H.-J. (eds.), Bildungsstandards auf dem Prüfstand. Arbeitspapiere der 25. Frühjahrskonferenz zur Erforschung des Fremdsprachenunterrichts. Tübingen: Narr, 159–167.Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. (2011). Elevating increased monitoring and testing to an educational imperative: Does this really make sense? Blog on foreign language education in the 21st century, http://juergenkurtz.wordpress.com/2011/12/14Google Scholar
Lasnier, J.-C., Morfeld, P., North, B., Borneto, C. S. & Späth, P. (2000). A quality guide for the evaluation and design of language learning and teaching programmes and materials. Brussels: European Commission & Denmark: PS Sprog & EDB.Google Scholar
Mackay, R., Wellesley, S., Tasman, D. & Bazerga, E. (1998). Using institutional self-evaluation to promote the quality of language and communication training programs. In Rea-Dickins, P. & Germaine, K. (eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching. London: Longman, 111–132.Google Scholar
Marsollier, C. (2002). L'innovation pédagogique: Ses figures, son sens et ses enjeux. www.reunion.iufm.fr/Recherche/Expressions/22/Marsollier.pdfGoogle Scholar
Matheidesz, M. (2010). International accreditation of quality in language learning and teaching. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes 39. www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/rs_nts39.pdfGoogle Scholar
McKay, P. (1999). Foreign language teaching in Australian primary schools. In Nikolov, M. & Curtain, H. (eds.), 225–243.Google Scholar
Muresan, L., Heyworth, F., Mateva, G. & Rose, M. (eds.) (2007). Qualitraining: A training guide for quality assurance in language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
National Standards for Foreign Language Education Project (1999, 2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (SFFLL) (2nd and 3rd edns). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. & Curtain, H. (eds.) (2000). An early start: Young learners and modern languages in Europe and beyond. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages. http://archive.ecml.at/documents/earlystart.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78. 2311–2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A.-B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H. & Soghikyan, C. (2007). European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Noijons, J., Bérešová, J., Breton, G. & Szabó, G. (2011). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). Highlights from the manual. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
North, B. & Mateva, G. (2006). A European profiling grid. www.eaquals.org.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2009). Action research in language education. http://lana-cometorich.blogspot.com/2009/07/action-research-in-language-education.htmlGoogle Scholar
O'Day, J. (2008). Standards-based reform: Promises, pitfalls, and potential lessons from the U.S. In Böttcher, W., Bos, W., Döbert, H. & Holtappels, H. G. (eds.), 107–115.Google Scholar
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education) (2012). Inspection reports. www.ofsted.gov.uk/inspection-reports/find-inspection-reportGoogle Scholar
Perregaux, C. (1994). Odyssea. Accueil et approches interculturelles. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: COROME.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. K. & Abbott, M. (2011). A decade of foreign language standards: Impact, influence and future directions. www.actfl.org/files/public/national-standards-2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P. & Germaine, K. (1992). Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, C. & Lockhart, C. (2000). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Beijing: People's Education Press & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, M. (2007). Leadership and a culture of quality. In Muresan, L.et al. (eds.), 23–31.Google Scholar
Rossner, R. (2008). Quality assurance in the provision of language education and training for adult migrants: Guidelines and options. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/liam/Source/Events/2008/Rossner_migrants_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy 22. 2, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallis, E. (2003). Total quality management in education (3rd edn). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Saville, N. (2005). Setting and monitoring professional standards: A QMS approach. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes 22. www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/rs_nts22.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, R. (1995). Are students customers? The metaphoric mismatch between management and education. Education 116.2, 215–220. http://roypoet.com/files/Are_Students_Customers.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sector Skills Council for Lifelong Learning (2007). New overarching professional standards for teachers, tutors and trainers in the lifelong learning sector (UK). Lifelong Learning UK. www.lluklegacy.org.Google Scholar
Seddon, J. (2000). A brief history of ISO 9000: Where did we go wrong? www.systemsthinking.co.uk/3-1-article.aspGoogle Scholar
Sims, S. J. & Sims, R. R. (1995). Total quality management in higher education. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
SurveyLang (2012). First European survey on language competences. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/eslc/docs/en/final-report-escl_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York & London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
TDA (Training and Development Agency for Schools) (2010). Professional standards for teachers (UK). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111218081624/http://tda.gov.uk/teacher/developing-career/professional-standards-guidance/downloads.aspxGoogle Scholar
TESOL (Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages) (2002). Program standards for adult education ESOL programs. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Inc.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. (2003). The arguments for and the meaning of quality. ELT Journal 57.3, 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timperley, H. S. & Phillips, G. (2003). Changing and sustaining educators’ expectations through professional development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education 19, 627–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unesco (2000). Declaration of responsibilities and human duties. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, L. (2007). Quality assurance in European higher education. In Weber, L. & Dolgova-Dreyer, K. (eds.), 17–30.Google Scholar
Weber, L. & Dolgova-Dreyer, K. (eds.) (2007). The legitimacy of quality assurance in higher education: The role of public authorities and institutions. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
White, R., Hockley, A., Laughner, M. S. & Van der Horst, J. (2008). From teacher to manager. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R., Martin, M., Stimson, M. & Hodge, R. (1991). Management in English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winder, R. E. & Judd, D. K. (1996). Organizational orienteering: Linking Deming, Covey, and Senge in an integrated five dimension quality model. In ASQC Seventh National Quality Management Conference Transactions. American Society for Quality. www.ldri.com/articles/96orgorient.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wulkow Memorandum (2010). Quality assurance at language centres in institutions of higher education in Europe. www.aulc.org/documents/Wulkow_Quality_memorandum_2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q. (2009). Reflective teaching: An effective path for EFL teacher's professional development. Canadian Social Science 5.2, 35–41.Google Scholar