Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T04:40:07.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selected poster presentations from the American Association of Applied Linguistics conference 2021

Japanese university students’ lexical diversity development in essay writing through theme-based instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2021

Naoya Shibata
Naoya Shibata*
Affiliation:
Nagoya University of Foreign Studies, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research in Progress
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 583 - 586
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A reproduction of the poster discussed is available in the supplementary material published alongside this article on Cambridge Core.

This poster session reports on findings from a mixed-methods research study with 45 intermediate English proficiency level Japanese sophomore students (seven males and 38 females) to explore the effect of theme-based instruction on their lexical diversity in academic essay writing.

References

Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Engber, C. A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, S. (2015). Lexical development in L2 English learners’ speeches and writings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JASP. (2020). https://jasp-stats.org/Google Scholar
Liang, J. (2007). Language scaffolding in second language writing. The CATESOL Journal, 19(1), 71–88. http://www.catesoljournal.org/volume-19-1Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2018). Content-based language teaching. Routledge.Google Scholar
Malvern, D. D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norouzian, R., De Miranda, M., & Plonsky, L. (2019). A Bayesian approach to measuring evidence in L2 research: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmadewi, N. N., & Artini, L. P. (2019). Using scaffolding strategies in teaching writing for improving student literacy in primary school. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2018), 156–160. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.36Google Scholar
Phonhan, P., Phusawisot, P., & Praphan, P. (2016). The effects of theme-based instruction for reducing Thai undergraduate students’ descriptive writing apprehension. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 16(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.14456/sujsha.2016.23Google Scholar
Shibata, N. (2019). The effectiveness of content-based instruction on beginners’ writing skills. In Clements, P., Krause, A., & Bennett, P. (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion (pp. 352–359). JALT. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2018-47Google Scholar
Text Inspector. (2020). https://textinspector.com/Google Scholar
Vo, S. (2019). Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Shibata supplementary material

Shibata supplementary material

Download Shibata supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.7 MB