Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:14:50.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second language speech comprehensibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2022

Dustin Crowther Open the ORCID record for Dustin Crowther [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniel Holden  and
Kristen Urada
Dustin Crowther*
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i
Daniel Holden
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i
Kristen Urada
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Published in Language Learning in 1995, Munro and Derwing's* investigation of foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in second language (L2) speech instigated significant change in L2 pronunciation research (Levis, 2020). A key finding was that despite the presence of a foreign accent, listeners could indeed comprehend L2 speech. Within their framework, comprehension of L2 speech was assessed along two dimensions. The first, intelligibility, was an assessment of actual listener comprehension, measured through listener transcriptions of a given utterance. The second, comprehensibility, was a scalar measure of how easy to understand listeners perceived an utterance to be. While these two measures of listener comprehension (i.e., understanding) have been shown to correlate, they have also been shown to measure different forms of understanding (Derwing & Munro, 2015). This means that while increased intelligibility can be associated with increased comprehensibility, it is still common for listeners to accurately transcribe nonnative speech while simultaneously indicating the speech to be hard to understand (i.e., evidence indicates that intelligibility outpaces comprehensibility in the development of L2 pronunciation). Research published in the 25 years since has repeatedly demonstrated that accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility are partially independent dimensions of L2 speech (Munro & Derwing, 2020). Whereas Munro and Derwing's (2011) research timeline attended to the concepts of accent and broad intelligibility (i.e., inclusive of both actual and ease of understanding), the past decade has seen an increased scholarly emphasis specifically on the global speech dimension of comprehensibility. Given this increased scholarly interest, our timeline is presented with the goal of tracing the post-Munro and Derwing (1995) development of L2 speech comprehensibility research.

Type
Research Timeline
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 470 - 489
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Holden and Urada are joint second authors.

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentais, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Thomson, R. I., & Munro, M. J. (2006). English pronunciation and fluency development in mandarin and slavic speakers. System, 34(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Harding, L. (2017). Pronunciation assessment. Language Teaching, 50(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (Eds.) (2017). Second language pronunciation assessment. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kang, O., & Ginther, A. (Eds.) (2018). Assessment in second language pronunciation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M. (2018). Empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension. Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2020). Changes in L2 pronunciation: 25 years of intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(3), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20054.lev.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68(2), 321–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). The foundations of accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2020). Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20038.mun.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2019). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319828413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2002). Research criteria for tenure in second language acquisition: Results from a survey of the field. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1982). The comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000437X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar