Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:16:48.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Needs analysis in language teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Richard West
Richard West
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, G. (1978). Motivation, materials, manpower and methods: some fundamental problems in ESP. ELT Documents, 103, 98–104.Google Scholar
Abbott, G. (1980). ESP and TENOR. ELT Documents, 107, 122–4.Google Scholar
Abbott, G. (1981a). Approaches to English teaching. In Abbott, G. & Wingard, P. (eds.), The teaching of English as an international language, 11–36. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Abbott, G. (1981b). Encouraging communication in English: a paradox. English Language Teaching Journal, 35, 3, 228–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, P., Heaton, B. & Howarth, P. (eds.) (1991). Socio-cultural issues in English for Academic Purposes. London & Basingstoke: Modern English Publications/British Council.Google Scholar
Alderson, C. (1980). A process approach to reading at the University of Mexico. Projects in Materials Design — ELT Documents Special, 134—63.Google Scholar
Alderson, C. (1991). Bands and scores. Review of English Language Teaching, I, 1, 71–86.Google Scholar
Allan, D. (1985/1992). Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. & Spada, N. (1983). Designing a communicative syllabus in the People's Republic of China. In Jordan, (ed.), 132–45.Google Scholar
Allwright, J. & Allwright, R. (1977). An approach to the teaching of Medical English. In Holden, (ed.), 58–62.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. (1982). Perceiving and pursuing learner's needs. In Geddes, M. & Sturtridge, G. (eds.), Individualisation, 24—31. Oxford: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Altman, H. (1980). Foreign language teaching: focus on the learner. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 1–16.Google Scholar
Altman, H. & James, C. V. (eds.) (1980). Foreign language teaching: meeting individual needs. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ashworth, M. (1985). Beyond methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Strick, G. (1981). An analytic approach to language program design. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 45–63.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education. In Richards, & Nunan, (eds.), 215–26.Google Scholar
Barber, C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. Reprinted in Swales, (ed.) (1985), 1–16.Google Scholar
Bell, R. (1981). An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Bergghen, O. (1987). From haphazard language teaching to efficient language training. Language Training, 8, 2.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: from theory to practice. In Johnson, (ed.), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bheiss, M. (1988). English for Nursing Purposes: the English language needs at the Nursing School of Al-Makassed Hospital (Jerusalem). Unpublished M Ed TESOL dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bloor, M. & Bloor, T. (1988). Syllabus negotiation: the basis of learner autonomy. In Brookes, & Grundy, (eds.), 62–74.Google Scholar
Blue, G. (1981). Self-directed learning systems and the role of the ESP teacher. ELT Documents, 112, 58–64.Google Scholar
Blue, G. (1988). Self-assessment: the limits of learner independence. In Brookes, & Grundy, (eds.), 100–18.Google Scholar
Blue, G. (ed.) (1993). Language, learning and success: studying through English. London & Basingstoke: Modern English Publications/British Council.Google Scholar
Bowers, R. (1980a). The background of students from the Indian sub-continent. ELT Documents, 109, 104–13.Google Scholar
Bowers, R. (1980b). The individual learner in the general class. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 66–80.Google Scholar
Brew, A. (1980). Responses of overseas students to differing teaching styles. ELT Documents, 109, 115–25.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (1984). Needs analysis and objective setting in the Adult Migrant Education Program. Sydney: New South Wales Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In Johnson, (ed.), 63—78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, A. & Grundy, P. (eds.) (1988). Individualization and Autonomy in Language Learning — ELT Documents, 131.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. & Grundy, P. (1990). Writing for study purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1992). The state of the art in applied linguistics. Review of English Language Teaching, 2, 1, 5–10.Google Scholar
Brown, G., O'Riordan, A. & Powell, G. (1993). Language training for trade unionists. Manchester: Department of Trade Union Education.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.) (1990). Research in the Language Classroom — ELT Documents, 133.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C., Moon, J. & Tongue, R. (eds.) (1991). Teaching English to children. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Bung, K. (1973). The foreign language needs of waiters and hotel staff. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, I, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C., Bruton, C. & Leather, J. (1974a-d). Doctor-patient communication skills: working papers I-IV. Lancaster: University of Lancaster (mimeo).Google Scholar
Candlin, C., Bruton, C. & Leather, J. (1976). Doctors in casualty: applying communicative competence to components of specialist course design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 14, 3, 245–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C., Bruton, C., Leather, J. & Woods, E. (1981). Designing modular materials for communicative language learning; an example: doctor-patient communication skills. In Selinker, et al. (eds.), 105–33.Google Scholar
Carrier, M. (1983). Computer-assisted needs analysis. Language Training, 4, 4.Google Scholar
Carroll, B. & West, R. (1989). The ESU framework – performance scales for language examinations. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R. (1980). The SP of the E. ELT Documents, 106, 97–108.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R. & Baumgardner, R. (eds.) (1988). ESP in the Classroom: Practice and Evaluation – ELT Documents, 128.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R. & Flanagan, M. (1978). Developing a flexible ESP programme design. ELT Documents, 101, 36–55.Google Scholar
Chambers, F. (1980). A re-evaluation of needs analysis in ESP. ESP Journal, I, 1, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, F. & McDonough, J. (1981). How many people? Opposing views on the function and preparation of the ESP teacher. ELT Documents, 112, 71–80.Google Scholar
Chaplen, F. (1970). The identification of non-native speakers of English likely to under-achieve in university courses through inadequate command of the language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Chitravelu, N. (1980). The University of Malaya English for Special Purposes project. ELT Documents, 107, v–xvi.Google Scholar
Christison, A. & Krahnke, K. (1986). Student perceptions of academic language study. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 1, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, B. (1984). State of the art article: ESP – English for specific purposes. Language Teaching, 17, 1, 2—16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, H. (1988). Analysing language needs in large organisations. English for Specific Purposes, J, 3, 155—69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth Education Liaison Committee (1961). Report of the Commonwealth Conference on the Teaching of English as a Second Language. Entebbe: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. (1970). Measuring language problems and attainment. English Language Teaching, 25, 1, 72—6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (1981). Modem languages (1971-1981). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cousin, W. (1982). Report of the workshops in the role and training of helpers for self-access language learning systems. Edinburgh: Moray House (mimeo).Google Scholar
Cowie, A. & Heaton, J. B. (eds.) (1977). English for Academic Purposes. Reading: British Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Crocker, T. (1981). ‘Scenes of endless science’: ESP and education. ELT Documents, 112, 7–15.Google Scholar
Cumaranatunge, L. (1988). An ESP case study: domestic aides in West Asia. In Chamberlain, & Baumgardner, (eds), 127–33.Google Scholar
Cunningsworth, A. (1983). Needs analysis – a review of the state of the art. System, n, 2, 149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Vies, A. (1977). Do foreign students have problems? In Cowie, & Heaton, (eds.), 34–6.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1981a). Review of Munby, Communicative Syllabus Design, 1978. English Language Teaching Journal, 35, 4, 472–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. (1981b). Review of Munby, Communicative syllabus design, 1978. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drury, J. (1983). The introduction of service English courses in ESL tertiary institutions in Africa. ELT Documents, 116, 121–34.Google Scholar
Dubin, F. & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course design: developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). One-to-one supervision of students writing M.Sc or Ph.D. theses. ELT Documents, 131, 136–41.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. & Swales, J. (1980). Study modes and students from the Middle East. ELT Documents, 109, 91–103.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. (1991). Learning to learn. In Brumfit, Moon & Tongue, (eds.), 191–200.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. & Sinclair, B. (19890). Learning to learn English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. & Sinclair, B. (1989b). Learning to learn English teacher's book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eltdu, (1970). English for Business: research and preliminary planning report. Colchester: English Language Teaching Development Unit.Google Scholar
Eltdu, (1975). Stages of Attainment Scale and Test Battery. Daventry: English Language Teaching Development Unit.Google Scholar
Embleton, D. (1992). An integrated strategy. In Embleton, & Hagen, (eds.), 1–32.Google Scholar
Embleton, D. & Hagen, S. (eds.) (1992). Languages in international business. Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Embleton, D., Hancy, H. & Gannon, H. (1992). In-company language training: three case studies. In Embleton, & Hagen, (eds.), 203–25.Google Scholar
Emmans, K., Hawkins, E. & Westoby, A. (1974). Foreign languages in industry/commerce. University of York, Language Teaching Centre.Google Scholar
Ewer, J. & Hughes-Davies, E. (1971–1972). Further notes on developing an English programme for students of science and technology. English Language Teaching, 26, 1, 65–70; 26, 3, 103–13. [Reprinted in Swafes, (ed.), 1985.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farringdon, O. (1981). The first five seconds: the ESP teacher and ‘out-of-the-blue’ language. ELT Documents, 112, 65—70.Google Scholar
Floyd, J. (1984). Study skills for higher education. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Frankel, M. (1983). Designing a pre-EAP course: practical problems. In Jordan, (ed.), 119—31.Google Scholar
Furneaux, C., Locke, C., Robinson, P. & Tonkyn, A. (1991). Talking heads and shifting bottoms: the ethnography of academic seminars. In Adams, et al. (eds.), 75—88.Google Scholar
Gardner, P. & Winslow, J. (1983). Present and proposed methods of determining the needs of students in public sector higher education. In Richterich, (ed.), 69–78.Google Scholar
Geoghegan, G. (1983). Non-native speakers of English at Cambridge University. Cambridge: Bell Educational Trust.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. (1986). What's whole about whole language? New Hampshire: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Greenall, G. (1981). The EST teacher: a negative view. ELT Documents, 112, 23–7.Google Scholar
Hagen, S. (1988). Introduction to Hagen, (ed.), xi–xlii.Google Scholar
Hagen, S. (ed.) (1988). Languages in British industry. Newcastle & London: Newcastle-upon-Tyne Polytechnic Products/Centre for Information on Language Teaching & Research.Google Scholar
Halliday, M., Mcintosh, A. & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harbord, J. (forthcoming 1994). Needs analysis: a teacher/student oriented approach. Perspectives Journal (Prague), June.Google Scholar
Harding-Esch, E. (1982). The open access sound and video library of the University of Cambridge: progress report and development. System, 10, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkey, R. (1980a). Syllabus design for specific purposes. ELT Documents Special: Projects in Materials Design: 82–133.Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. (1980b). Needs analysis and syllabus design for specific purposes. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 81–93.Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. (1983). Programme development for learners of English. In Richterich, (ed.), 79–87.Google Scholar
Hawkey, R. & Nakornchai, C. (1980). Thai students studying. ELT Documents, 109, 70–8.Google Scholar
Henderson, W. & Skehan, P. (1980). The team-teaching of introductory economics to overseas students. ELT Documents, 112, 34–47.Google Scholar
Hoadley-Maidment, E. (ed.) (1980). Analysing student needs. London: National Centre for Industrial Language Training, Working Paper 16.Google Scholar
Hoadley-Maidment, E. (1983). Methodology for the identification of language learning needs of immigrant learners of English through mother-tongue interviews. In Richterich, (ed.), 39–51.Google Scholar
Holden, S. (ed.) (1977). English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1980). Learner training: meeting needs in self-directed learning. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 30–45.Google Scholar
Holec, H. (1985). Taking learners' needs into account in self-directed learning. In Riley, (ed.), 263–75.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1984). Research into classroom culture as necessary input into syllabus design. In Swales, J. & Mustafa, H. (eds.), English for Specific Purposes in the Arab world, 29–51. Birmingham: University of Aston.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1994). The house of TESEP and the communicative approach: the special needs of state English language education. ELT Journal, 48, 1, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. & Cooke, T. (1982). An ecological approach to ESP. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 5 (Issues in ESP), 123–43.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. & Knight, M. (1977). Student specific English one-to-one courses. In Holden, (ed.), 67–9.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1980). ESP at the crossroads. ESP Newsletter, 36, [Reprinted in Swales, (ed.), 1985, 177–85.]Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T., Waters, A. & Breen, M. (1979). An English language curriculum for technical students. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Teaching, 2.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
James, C. V. (1974). Estimating adult needs. In Perren, G. E. (ed.), Teaching languages to adults for special purposes, 76–90. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching & Research.Google Scholar
James, K. (1980a). Seminar overview. ELT Documents, 109, 7–21.Google Scholar
James, K. (1980b). Survey of University of Manchester overseas post-graduate students' initial level of competence in English and their subsequent academic performance: calendar year 1977. ELT Documents, 109, 126–33.Google Scholar
James, K. (1984). The writing of theses by speakers of English as a foreign language: the results of a case study. ELT Documents, 117, 99–113.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (1981). Necessary English: a faculty survey. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 1, 51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. (1981). Some problems of a world-wide profession. ELT Documents, 112, 16–22.Google Scholar
Johns, T. & Dudley-Evans, A. (1980). An experiment in team-teaching of overseas postgraduate students of transportation and plant biology. ELT Documents, 106, 6–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (ed.) (1989). The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. (1991). An integrated model for ESP syllabus design. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 3, 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R. (1977). Identification of problems and needs: a student profile. In Cowie, & Heaton, (eds.), 12–20.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. (ed.) (1983). Case studies in ELT. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. (1993). Study skills: experience and expectations. In Blue, (ed.), 70–9.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. (book forthcoming). English for Academic Purposes.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. & Mackay, R. (1973). A survey of the spoken English problems of overseas postgraduate students at the universities of Manchester and Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Journal of the Institute of Education of the Universities of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Durham, 125.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. & Matthews, A. (1978). English for academic purposes: practice material for the listening comprehension and writing needs of overseas students. ELT Documents, 101, 7–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1980). Fundamental problems in ESP. ELT Documents, 106, 118–26.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1987). Innovating for a change. English Language Teaching Journal, 41, 3, 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1988). Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects. Applied Linguistics, 9, 4, 329–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.Google Scholar
Lee, E. (1977). Non-specialist use of foreign languages in industry and commerce. Audio-Visual Language Journal, 15, 3, 223–31.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (1992). Curriculum design. Review of English Language Teaching, 2, 1, 11–22.Google Scholar
Looms, P. (1983). A re-examination of foreign language teaching provision in Denmark. In Richterich, (ed.), 60—8.Google Scholar
Low, G. (1991). Talking to questionnaires: pragmatic models in questionnaire design. In Adams, et al. (eds.), 117—33.Google Scholar
Lynch, P., Stevens, A. & Sands, P. (1993). The language audit. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. & Anderson, K. (1991). Do you mind if I come in here? — a comparison of EAP seminar/discussion materials and characteristics of real academic discussion. In Adams, et al. (eds.), 88–99.Google Scholar
Macgregor, E. (1979). Feedback and evaluation in role-play. In Webb, J. (ed.), 32–6. Lexden Papers 1. Colchester: Lexden Centre.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. (1978). Identifying the nature of learners' needs. In Mackay, & Mountford, (eds.), 21–42.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. & Bosquet, M. (1981). LSP curriculum development – from policy to practice. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 1–28.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. & Mountford, A. (eds.) (1978). English for Specific Purposes. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. & Palmer, J. (eds.) (1981). Languages for Specific Purposes. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Maley, A. (1980). Making sense: reconciling ideas and constraints in materials production. Projects in Materials Design — ELT Documents Special, 37–60.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1985). Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1986). Systemic functional linguistics and an understanding of written text. Papers in Applied Linguistics (University of Sydney), 4, 91–109.Google Scholar
Mason, D. (1989). An examination of authentic dialogues for use in the ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 1, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, J. (1984). ESP in Perspective. London: Collins.Google Scholar
McDonough, H. (1994). A teacher looks at teachers' diaries. ELT Journal, 48, 1, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. (1980). Expectations and sources of motivation in EAP. English Language Research Journal, I (University of Birmingham).Google Scholar
Morrow, K. (1983). The Royal Society of Arts Examination in the Communicative Use of English as a Foreign Language. In Jordan, (ed.), 102–7.Google Scholar
Mountpord, A. (1988). Factors influencing ESP materials production and use. In Chamberlain, & Baumgardner, (eds), 76–84.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1977). Processing profiles of communicative needs. In English for Specific Purposes. Bogota: British Council.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1984). Communicative syllabus design: principles and problems. In Read, J. (ed.), Trends in language syllabus design – anthology series 13, 55–67. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (1992). A model for course design in ESP for Business. Unpublished M.Ed. TESOL dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (1994). The Complete Business English Generator. Turku, Finland: Media-Time (UK distributor: Oxford English Book Centre).Google Scholar
North, B. (1991). Standardisation of continuous assessment grades. Review of English Language Teaching, I, 1, 167–77.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988a). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988b). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1989). Hidden agendas: the role of the learner in programme implementation. In Johnson, (ed.), 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'brien, J. (1989). Involving the learners in course evaluation: a diary study during a pre-sessional English Language course. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E. (1989). The fact-finding phase in the policy-making process: the case of a language of wider communication. In Kennedy, C. (ed.), Language planning and English language teaching, 44—57. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Oskarsson, M. (1977). Approaches to self-assessment in foreign language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe/Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ostler, S. (1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 4, 489–502.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (1981a). Register research design. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 64–73.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (1981b). Discourse analysis. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 74–91.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B. & Howell-Richardson, C. (1990). Learner diaries. In Brumfit, & Mitchell, (eds.), 128–40.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. (1981). Toward a theory of LSP methodology. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 92–105.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. & Shettlesworth, C. (1978). How to ARM your students: a consideration of two approaches to providing materials for ESP. ELT Documents, 101, 23–35.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, A. (1979). The language audit. Language Training, I, 2, 4–5.Google Scholar
Porcher, L. (1983a). Migrant workers learning French in France: a practical experiment. In Richterich, (ed.), 14—23.Google Scholar
Porcher, L. (1983b). Reflections on language needs in the school. In Richterich, (ed.), 127–49.Google Scholar
Porter, A., Goldstein, L., Leatherman, J. & Conrad, S. (1990). An ongoing dialogue: learning logs for teacher preparation. In Richards, & Nunan, (eds.), 227–40.Google Scholar
Price, J. (1980). The structure of postgraduate taught courses in engineering: some implications for language course design. ELT Documents, 109, 50–68.Google Scholar
Ranney, S. (1992). Learning a new script: an exploration of sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, B. (1992). Business culture training. In Embleton, & Hagen, (eds.), 153–65.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 1, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. (1984). Language curriculum development. RELC Journal, 15, 1, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. & Nunan, D. (eds.) (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (1971). Analytical classification of the categories of adults needing to learn foreign languages. Reprinted in Trim, et al. (1973/1980), 63–88.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (1973/1980). Definition of language needs and types of adults. In Trim, et al. , 29–88.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (1979). Identifying language needs as a means of determining educational objectives with the learners. In A European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (1983). Introduction to Richterich, (ed.) (1983), 1–13.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (ed.) (1983). Case studies in identifying language needs. Oxford: Pergamon/Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. & Chancerel, J.-L. (1977/1980). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe/Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Riddell, P. (1991). Analysing student needs in designing specific purpose language syllabuses. Language Learning Journal, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, P. (ed.) (1985). Discourse and learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rixon, S. (1992). English and other languages for younger children. Language Teaching, 25, 2, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, B. (1981). The helpful EST teacher. ELT Documents, 112, 28–32.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1981). The contribution of discourse analysts to ESP and of ESP practitioners to discourse analysis. ELT Documents, 112, 53–7.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Rodgers, T. (1980). Materials development: in prospect. Projects in Materials – Design – ELT Documents Special, 144–71.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M. do R. (1983). Identification of the language needs of pupils learning French within the Portuguese educational system. In Richterich, (ed.), 52–60.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1981). Needs assessment in English for Specific Purposes: the case study. In Selinker, Taronc & Hanzcli, (eds.), 199–210.Google Scholar
Schutz, N. & Derwing, B. (1981). The problem of needs assessment in English for Specific Purposes: some theoretical and practical considerations. In Mackay, & Palmer, (eds.), 29–44.Google Scholar
Selinker, L., Tarone, E. & Hanzeli, V. (eds.) (1981). English for Academic and Technical Purposes. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Shaw, P. (1982). Ad hoc needs analysis. Modern English Teacher, 10, 1, 10–15.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. & Ellis, G. (1992). Survey: learner training in EFL course books. ELT Journal, 46, 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. & Arun, P. (1980). Common sense and ESP. Projects in Materials Design – ELT Documents Special, 207–21.Google Scholar
Spaventa, L. (1980). Testing people and placement. Modem English Teacher, 7, 4, 28–31.Google Scholar
Strevens, P. (1977). Special-purpose language learning: a perspective. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, 10, 3, 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, P. (1980). The paradox of individualised instruction: it takes better teachers to focus on the learner. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 17–19.Google Scholar
Strevens, P. (1988). The learner and the teacher of ESP. In Chamberlain, & Baumgardner, (eds.), 39–44.Google Scholar
Stuart, W. & Lee, E. (1972/1985). The non-specialist use of foreign languages in industry and commerce. Sidcup: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry Examinations Board.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1980). The educational environment and its relevance to ESP programme design. Projects in Materials Design – ELT Documents Special, 61–81.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (ed.) (1985). Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon/Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1989). Service English programme design and opportunity cost. In Johnson, (ed.), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C. (1988). The organisational administration of an ESP unit: a case study. In Chamberlain, & Baumgardner, (eds) 108–24.Google Scholar
Tarantino, M. (1988). Italian in-field EST users self-assess their macro- and micro-level needs: a case study. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 1, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. & Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teemant, A., Varga, Z. & Heltai, P. (1993). Hungary's nationwide needs analysis of vocationally-oriented foreign language teaching. Budapest: Ministry of Culture & Education/USIS.Google Scholar
Tickoo, M. (1988). Michael West in India: a centenary salute. English Language Teaching Journal, 42, 4, 294—300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, S. (1988). On clarifying curricular intent: ESP and contributions from curriculum theory. Teaching English for Specific Purposes (Manila), 7 (June), 1–22.Google Scholar
Tongue, R. (1991). English as a foreign language at primary level. In Brumfit, Moon & Tongue, (eds.), 109–14.Google Scholar
Trim, J. (1973/1980). Draft outline of a European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. In Trim, et al. , 15–28.Google Scholar
Trim, J. (1977/1980). Preface to Richterich & Chancercl, vii–viii.Google Scholar
Trim, J. (1980). The place of needs analysis in the Council of Europe Modern Language Project. In Altman, & James, (eds.), 46–65.Google Scholar
Trim, J., Richterich, R., Van Ek, J. & Wilkins, D. (1973/1980). Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe/Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Utley, D. (1992). The language audit. In Embleton, & Hagen, (eds.), 33–46.Google Scholar
Van Der Handt, G. (1983). Needs identification and curricula with particular reference to German for migrant workers. In Richterich, (ed.), 24–38.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. (1975). The Threshold Level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Van Hest, E. & Oud-De Glas, M. (1990). A survey of techniques used in the diagnosis and analysis of foreign language needs in industry. Brussels: Lingua.Google Scholar
Ward, Goodbody M. (1993). Letting the students choose: a placement procedure for a pre-sessional course. In Blue, (ed.), 49–57.Google Scholar
Waters, M. & Waters, A. (1992). Study skills and study competence: getting the priorities right. English Language Teaching Journal, 46, 3, 274–84.Google Scholar
Watt, J. (1980). Performance of overseas postgraduate students: a management teacher's view. ELT Documents, 109, 38–43.Google Scholar
West, R. (1992). Teaching English for Specific Purposes- Unit 5: needs analysis approaches (a). Manchester: Centre for English Language Studies in Education, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
White, R. (1988). The ELT curriculum. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1979). ESP: criteria for course design (mimeo).Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1987). Aspects of syllabus design. In Tickoo, M. (ed.), Language syllabuses: state of the art. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 9, 145—58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. (1991). A framework for teaching English to young learners. In Brumfit, Moon & Tongue, (eds.), 203—12.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yalden, J. (1987a). Principles of course design for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yalden, J. (1987b). The communicative syllabus. Hemcl Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Yates, C. (1977). What objectives? In Holden, (ed.), 47–9.Google Scholar