Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:29:52.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language learning in mindbodyworld: A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

Dwight Atkinson
Dwight Atkinson*
Affiliation:
Purdue [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on recent research in cognitive science, interaction, and second language acquisition (SLA), I describe a sociocognitive approach to SLA. This approach adopts a non-cognitivist view of cognition: Instead of an isolated computational process in which input is extracted from the environment and used to build elaborate internal knowledge representations, cognition is seen as adaptive intelligence, enabling our close and sensitive alignment to our ecosocial environment in order to survive in it. Mind, body, and world are thus functionally integrated from a sociocognitive perspective instead of radically separated.

Learning plays a major part in this scenario: If environments are ever-changing, then adaptation to them is continuous. Learning is part of our natural ability to so adapt, while retaining traces of that adaptation in the integrated mind-body-world system. Viewed in this way, SLA is adaptation to/engagement with L2 environments.

Interaction also plays a central role in sociocognitive SLA: We learn L2s through interacting with/in L2 environments. Founded on innate, universal skills which evolutionarily preceded language and make it possible, interaction supports SLA at every turn. Having presented this argument, I illustrate it by analyzing a video clip of an EFL tutoring session, indicating various ‘sociocognitive tools’ for interactive alignment which undergird L2 development.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 467 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andor, J. (2004). The master and his performance: An interview with Noam Chomsky. Intercultural Pragmatics 1, 93–111.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011a). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2011b). Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), 1–23.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2011c). A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition: How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages. In D. Atkinson (ed.), 143–166.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2012). Adaptive intelligence and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review 2, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T. & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 91, 169–188.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D., Markman, E., Bill, B., Desjardins, R., Irwin, J. & Tidball, G. (1996). Infants’ reliance on a social criterion for establishing word–object relations. Child Development 67.6, 3135–3153.Google Scholar
Beretta, A. (ed.) (1993). Special issue on theory construction in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14.3.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M. (2006). Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 37, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, T. & Bargh, J. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 6, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchill, E. (2008). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: From ecology to form-relations. Applied Linguistics 29, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, E., Nishino, T., Okada, H. & Atkinson, D. (2010). Symbiotic gesture and the sociocognitive visibility of grammar. The Modern Language Journal 94, 234–253.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1999). Visual awareness and visuomotor action. In Nuñez, R. & Freeman, W. (eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion. Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic, 1–18.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis 58, 7–19.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (1995). An applied linguist in principle and practice. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Essays in honour of H. G. Widdowson. London: Oxford University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 148–153.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 256–310.Google Scholar
Drahota, A., Costall, A. & Reddy, V. (2008). The vocal communication of different kinds of smile. Speech Communication 50, 278–287.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In Enfield, N. & Levinson, S. (eds.), 399–430.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. & Levinson, S. (eds.) (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 20, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In Coupland, J. & Gwin, R. (eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 19–42.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (1988). Second language acquisition theory: The case for a generative perspective. In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 15–40.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2013). Gestures in second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569–1579.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M. (ed.), New psychology of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 155–175.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), 117–142.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsbourne, M. & Jordan, J. S. (2009). Embodied anticipation: A neurodevelopmental interpretation. Discourse Processes 46, 103–26.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (1996). SLA theory building: Letting all the flowers bloom! Language Learning 46, 713–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In Lantolf, J. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (ed.), 24–47.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2006). On the human ‘interaction engine’. In N. Enfield & S. Levinson (eds.), 39–69.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 81, 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, J. & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of interculturality through embodied completion: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27, 195–219.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2009). Extending our view of the mind: Review of A. Clark, Supersizing the mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 237–238.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. & Thompson, S. (eds.) (1997). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 515–526.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1998). Intersubjective attunement and linguistically mediated meaning in discourse. In Braten, S. (ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–40.Google Scholar
Schegloff, M. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. Enfield & S. Levinson (eds.), 40–96.Google Scholar
Seo, M.-S. & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 2219–2239.Google Scholar
Smotrova, T. & Lantolf, J. (in press). The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. The Modern Language Journal 97.2.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 28.5, 675–691.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922/1978). The nature of social activity. In Runciman, W. (ed.), Weber: Selections in translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–32.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ylanne-McEwen, V. & Coupland, N. (2000). Accommodation theory: A conceptual resource for intercultural sociolinguistics. In Spencer-Oatley, H. (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum, 191–216.Google Scholar
Yu, C., Ballard, D. & Aslin, R. (2005). The role of embodied intention in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Science 29, 961–1005.Google Scholar
Zuengler, J. (1991). Accommodation in native-nonnative interactions: Going beyond the ‘what’ to the ‘why’ in second-language research. In Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J. (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–244.Google Scholar