Allen, J. P. B. (1973). Applied grammatical models in a remedial English syllabus. In Corder, S. Pit & Roulet, E. (eds.), Theoretical linguistic models in applied linguistics. AIMAV, Brussels; Didier, Paris.Google Scholar

Ballard, V. S. (1970). Frequent errors in French. TBull, 5, 2, 1–6.Google Scholar

Bierwisch, M. (1970). Fehlerlinguistik. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 397–414.Google Scholar

Boomer, D. S. & Layer, J. D. M. (1968). Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, R. W. (1973). Development of the first language in the human species. American Psychologist, 02 73, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 1, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, M., Dulay, H. & Hernandez, E. (1973). Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Burt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The gooficon. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Burt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1975). Global and local mistakes. In Schumann & Stenson, New frontiers.Google Scholar

Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J. & Schumann, J. (1974). Testing hypotheses about second language acquisition: the copula and negative in three subjects. Working Papers on Bilingualism, no. 3. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. (1968). Zum Pidgin-Deutsch der Gastarbeiter. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung, 35, 130–9.Google Scholar

Cook, V. J. (1969). The analogy between first and second language learning. IRAL, 7, 207- 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, V. J. (1973). The comparison of language development in native children and foreign adults. IRAL, 11, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. IRAL, 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1971 a). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. IRAL, 9, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1971 b). Describing the language learner's language. CILT Reports and Papers, no. 6, 57–64.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1972). Die Rolle der Interpretation bei der Untersuchungvon Schulfehiern. In Nickel, G., Fehierkunde. Berlin.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1974 a). The elicitation of interlanguage. Special issue of IRAL on the occasion of Bertil Malmberg's 60th birthday. Stuttgart: Julius Groos.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. (forthcoming). Simple codes and the source of the second language learner's initial heuristic hypothesis. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. & Roulet, E. (eds.) (forthcoming). Linguistic approaches to applied linguistics. Papers from the IVth Neuchatel Colloquium, 1975. AIMAV, Brussels; Didier, Paris.Google Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1972). Goofing: an indicator of children's second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 22, 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dato, D. P. (1972). The development of the Spanish verb phrase in children's second language learning. In Pimsleur, & Quinn, (eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 2, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 a). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 b). A new perspective on the creative construction hypothesis in child second language acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 4,71–98. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 c). Errors and strategies in child language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 d). You can't learn without goofing: an analysis of children's second language errors. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar

Duškov´, L. (1969). On sources of errors in foreign languages. IRAL, 7, 11–36.Google Scholar

Eliasson, S. (1973). Review of Filipović (ed.), Zagreb conference on English contrastive projects. Studia Linguistica, 27.Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). Structure and process in language acquisition. Georgetown Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, no. 23, 313–53. 21st Annual Round Table.Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974). Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby-talk in six languages. In Gumperz, & Hymes, (eds.), The ethnography of communication, 103–4. Special number of American Anthropologist, 66, 6, Pt. 2. Washington, American Anthropological Assoc.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of the copula and the notion simplicity. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolisation of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Towards a characterisation of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 1–14.Google Scholar

Fitikides, T. J. (1967). Common mistakes in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

French, F. G. (1949). Common errors in English: their cause, prevention and cure. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 229, 110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

George, H. V. (1972). Common errors in language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Gorbet, F. (1974). Error analysis: what teachers can do. In Shiu, R. (ed.), Errors: a new perspective. Toronto: Research Division, Directorate of Studies, Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Grauberg, W. (1971). An error analysis in German of first year university students. In Perren, G. & Trim, J. (eds.), Papers for the second international congress of applied linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hakuta, , Kenji, (1974). Preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese girl learning English as a second language. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 3, 18–43. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (1973). The insufficiency of error analysis. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar

Hamp, E. P. (1965). What a contrastive grammar is not, if it is. Georgetown Round Table Monograph, no. 21.Google Scholar

Hatch, E. R. (1972). Some studies in language learning. Working papers in TESL, no. 6, 29–36. Los Angeles: University of Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Hatch, E. R. (1974). Second language learning – universals? Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 3, 06 1974. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Holley, F. & King, J. M. (1975). Imitation and correction in foreign language learning. In Schumann & Stenson, New frontiers.Google Scholar

Jain, M. P. (1974). Error analysis: source, cause and significance. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar

James, C. (1971 a). The exculpation of contrastive linguistics. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Papers in contrastive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

James, C. (1971 b). Foreign language learning by dialect expansion. Paper read to PAKS Symposium, Stuttgart, 1971.Google Scholar

James, C. (1974). Linguistic measures for error gravity. AVLA Journal, 12, 1, 3–9.Google Scholar

James, C. (1975). Judgements of error gravities. ELS, 07 1975.Google Scholar

Johansson, S. (1973). The identification and evaluation of error in foreign languages; a functional approach. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar

Johansson, S. (forthcoming). Problems in the study of the communicative effect of learner's errors. In Corder& Roulet (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar

Krzeszowski, T. P. (1974). Contrastive generative grammar: theoretical foundations. Lodz: University Press.Google Scholar

Kellerman, E. (1974). Elicitation, lateralization and error analysis. York Papers in Linguistics, 4. University of York.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Lange, M. (1974). L'analyse des erreurs: état actuel de la recherche. In Shiu, R. (ed.), Errors: a new perspective. Toronto: Research Division, Directorate of Studies, Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Lee, W. R. (1970). The Dolphin English Course – Teachers' companion. London: OUP.Google Scholar

Leisi, E. (1972). Theoretische Grundlagen der Fehierbewertung. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Fehierkunde.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. S. M. (forthcoming). Skill theory and language teaching. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar

Levenston, E. A. (1971). Over-indulgence and under-representation – aspects of mother tongue interference. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Contrastive linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lindell, E. (1973). The four pillars: on the goals of foreign language teaching. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar

Linnarud, M. (1975). Lexis in free production. An analysis of the lexical texture of Swedish students' written work. Report No. 6. Department of English, Lund University.Google Scholar

Milon, J. P. (1974). The development of negation in English by a second language learner. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naiman, , Neil, . (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 2. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Nehls, , Dietrich, (1974). Fehleranalyse versus Kontrastive Analyse. Reports of 5th Annual Congress of G.A.L. (1973 IRAL Sonderband). Stuttgart: Julius Groos.Google Scholar

Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systemsof foreign language learners. IRAL, 9, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemser, W. & Slama-Cazacu, T. (1970). Contact analysis: a psycholinguistic approach. Revue Romaine de Linguistique, 15, 2.Google Scholar

Newmark, L. & Reibel, D. (1967). Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. IRAL, 6, 3.Google Scholar

Nickel, G. (1971 a). Contrastive linguistics and foreign language teaching. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Papers in contrastive linguistics. London: CUP.Google Scholar

Nickel, G. (1971 b). Problems of learners' difficulties in foreign language acquisition. IRAL, 9, 3, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickel, G. (1972). Grundsätzliches zur Fehleranalyse & Fehierbewertung. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Fehlerkunde.Google Scholar

Nickel, G. (ed.) (1972). Fehlerkunde. Berlin: Cornelsen, Velhagen & Kissing.Google Scholar

Nickel, G. (1973). Aspects of error analysis and grading. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar

Olsson, M. (1972). Intelligibility: a study of errors and their importance. The GUME project. Göteborg: Pedagogiska Institutionen Lärarhögskolan.Google Scholar

Olsson, M. (1973). The effects of different types of errors in the communication situation. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar

Olsson, M. (1974). A study of errors: frequency, origins and effects. Göteborg: Pedagogiska Institutionen Lärarhögskolan.Google Scholar

Ravem, R. (1974). WH-questions in first and second language learners. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1971 a). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. ELT, 25, 204–19.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1971 b). Error analysis and second language strategies. Language Science, 17, 12–22.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1972). Social factors, interlanguage and language learning. Language Learning, 22, 2, 159–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, J. C. (ed.) (1974 a). Error analysis. Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1974 b). Simplification: a strategy in the adult acquisition of a foreign language: an example from Indonesian/Malay. Paper given at the Second Conference on the Standardisation of Asian Languages. Manila, 1974.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. & Sampson, G. P. (1974). The study of learner English. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar

Ritchie, W. (1967). Some implication of generative grammar for the construction of courses in English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 17, 45–68, 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samarin, W. J. (1971). Salient and substantive pidginization. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolisation of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schumann, , John, (1974). The implications of interlanguage, pidginization and creolization for the study of adult second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumann, J. & Stenson, N. (1975). New frontiers in second language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Selinker, , Larry, (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics, 9, 67–92.Google Scholar

Selinker, , Larry, (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 3, 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1971). Psycholinguistics and contrastive studies. Zagreb Conference on English Contrastive Projects. Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1974). Theoretical interpretation and methodological consequences of ‘regularisation]. In Further developments in contrastive studies. Romanian—English Contrastive Analysis Project. Bucharest University Press.Google Scholar

Sternglass, M. S. (1974). Close similarities in dialect features of black and white college students in remedial composition classes. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 3, 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenson, , Nancy, (1975). Induced errors. In Schumann & Stenson (eds.), New frontiers in second language learning.Google Scholar

Strevens, , Peter, , (1969). Two ways of looking at error analysis. Paper given at GAL meeting, Stuttgart (1969). Zielsprache Deutsch, 1 (1971), 1–6.Google Scholar

Svartvik, J. (1973). Introduction to Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata: papers in error analysis.Google Scholar

Svartvik, J. (1973). Errata: papers in error analysis. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Swain, M., Dumas, G. & Naiman, N. (1974). Alternatives to spontaneous speech: elicited translation and imitation as indicators of second language competence. Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 3. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Taylor, B. P. (1974). Toward a theory of language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 1, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiem, R. (1969). Bibliographyofcontrastive linguistics. PAKS – Arbeitsbericht, 2,79–96; 3/4, 93–120.Google Scholar

Tarone, , Elaine, (1974). A discussion on the Dulay and Burt studies. Working Papers on Bilingualism, no. 4. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Valdman, , Albert, & Phillips, J. S. (forthcoming). Pidginization, creolisation and the elaboration of learner systems. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar

Valdman, , Albert, (1975 a). Error analysis and pedagogical ordering. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.), Linguistic insights in applied linguistics. Brussels, AIMAV; Paris, Didier.Google Scholar

Valdman, , Albert, (1975 b). Bibliography of language learners' approximative systems and error analysis. Washington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Van, Buren P. (1974). Contrastive analysis. In Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P., Techniques in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Váradi, , Tamás, (1973). Strategies of target language learner communications: message adjustment. Paper given at the 6th Conference of the Rumanian–English Linguistic Project, Timisoara, 1973.Google Scholar

Wardhaugh, G. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 2. Reprinted in Schumann, & Stenson, (eds.), New frontiers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Widdowson, H. W. (forthcoming). The significance of simplification. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar

Zydatiss, W. (1973). Fehler in der Englischen Satzgliedfolge. IRAL, 11, 4, 319–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zydatiss, W. (1974 a). A ‘kiss of life’ for the notion of error. IRAL, 12, 3, 234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zydatiss, W. (1974 b). Lernprobleme im Englischen und ihre Behandlung in einer didaktischen Grammatik. Linguistik und Didaktic, 20, 5.Google Scholar

Zydatiss, W. (1974 c). Some Test Formats for Elicitation Procedures. IRAL, 12, 281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar