Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:00:12.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer-assisted language learning: Mapping the territory - Michael Levy, Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Pp. xv + 298. ISBN 978-0-19-823631-3 (paperback). - Carol A. Chapelle, Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research (Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Pp. xvii + 215. ISBN 978-0-521-62646-0 (paperback). - Mike Levy & Glenn Stockwell, CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006. Pp. xviii + 310. ISBN 0-8058-5634X (paperback).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Angela Chambers*
Affiliation:
University of Limerick, [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comparative Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blin, F. (2004). Call and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL 16.2, 377395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1989). CALL research in the 1980s: Setting the stage for the 1990s. CALL Digest 5.7, 79.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. (1994). Theoretical bases for human computer interaction research in CALL. CALICO'94 Conference Proceedings. Durham, NC: CALICO, 53–57.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G. & Higgins, J. (1982). Computers, language and language learning. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, R. (1999). Evaluating performance, approach and outcome. In Cameron, K. (ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications. Exeter: Elm Bank, 109140.Google Scholar
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hémard, D. (2003). Language learning online: Designing towards user acceptability. In Felix, U. (ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2143.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1977). The monitor model of adult second language performance. In Burt, M., Dulay, H. & Finocchiaro, M. (eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York: Regents, 155161.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Murray, L. & Hourigan, T. (2008). Blogs for Specific Purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach? ReCALL 20.1, 8398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shield, L. & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2008). An overview of Mobile Assisted Language Learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 20.3, 271289.Google Scholar
Stevens, V. (2006). Second life in education and language learning. TESL-EJ 10.3, 4 pp. http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej39/int.pdf.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. In Fotos, S. (ed.), Multimedia language teaching. Tokyo: Logos International, 320.Google Scholar
Yildiz, R. & Atkins, M. (1993). Evaluating multimedia applications. Computers in Education 21.12, 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar