Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:07:03.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2011

Frank Boers
Frank Boers*
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington, New [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pace at which new L2 words or expressions are acquired is influenced by the degree of engagement with them on the part of the learner. Several researchers with a Cognitive-Linguistics (CL) background have, since the 1990s, proposed ways of exploiting non-arbitrary aspects of vocabulary as stimuli for such engagement. Their proposals have been backed up by the results of several quasi-experimental studies. It must be acknowledged, however, that many of these are small-scale, some show only small effect sizes, and some are hard to interpret due to confounding variables. Taken collectively, the reported experiments are nevertheless beginning to constitute a body of evidence in favour of CL-informed instruction that is hard to dismiss, so there is reason to believe that this kind of instruction deserves a niche in second language programmes. However, a judicious implementation of CL ideas stands to gain considerably from a closer alignment with ‘mainstream’ second language vocabulary research. Insights to be taken on board from the mainstream concern issues of selection, the desirability of distributed learning, and the need to cater for complementary types of knowledge.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 208 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alejo, R., Piquer, A. M. & Reveriego, G. (2010). Phrasal verbs in EFL course books. In De Knop, S., Boers, F. & De Rycker, A. (eds.), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J., Sommers, M. S. & Sunderman, G. (2011). Some costs of fooling Mother Nature: A priming study on the Keyword Method and the quality of developing L2 lexical representations. In Trofimovich, P. & McDonough, K. (eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, A. & Gyllstad, H. (2009). Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beréndi, M., Csábi, S. & Kövecses, Z. (2008). Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.), 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. (1996). Spatial prepositions and metaphor: A journey along the up-down and front-back dimensions. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2000a). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes 19, 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. (2000a). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics 21, 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. (2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesising about their origin. Prospect 16, 35–43.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2011). Cognitive Semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9.1, 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.) (2008). Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M. & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms. In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J. & Stengers, H. (2006a). Means of motivating multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits and cognitive-style variables. In Foster-Cohen, S. (ed.), Eurosla Yearbook 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169–190.Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J. & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research 11, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Piquer, A. M., Stengers, H. & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms? Language Teaching Research 13, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H. & Demecheleer, M. (2006b). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H. & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.), 189–216.Google Scholar
Brugman, C. (1981). Story of over. M.A. thesis. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Cermak, L. S. & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cho, K. (2010). Fostering the acquisition of English prepositions by Japanese learners with networks and prototypes. In S. Knop, De, Boers, F. & De Rycker, A. (eds.), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, N. (2008). How Cognitive Linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.), 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csábi, S. (2004). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In Achard, M. & Niemeier, S. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danesi, M. (1992). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. In Alatis, J. A. (ed.), Language, communication and social meaning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Round Tables on Languages and Linguistics, 489–500.Google Scholar
Deconinck, J., Boers, F. & Eyckmans, J. (2010). Helping learners engage with L2 words: The form-meaning fit. AILA Review 23, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A., Gabrys, D. & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal 51, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S. & De Rycker, A. (2008). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S., Boers, F. & De Rycker, A. (2010). Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erman, B. & Warren, B. (2001). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20, 87–120.Google Scholar
Erten, İ. H. & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System 36, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, M. & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L.-Q. & Meng, G.-H. (2010). A study of the effect of metaphor awareness raising on Chinese EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention. Canadian Social Science 6, 110–124.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (eds.) (2007). The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, S.-F. (2007). Is idiom comprehension influenced by metaphor awareness of the learners? The Linguistics Journal 3, 148–166.Google Scholar
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive Linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y.-H. & Fong, Y.-Y. (2010). Obstacles to conceptual-metaphor guided L2 idiom interpretation. In De Knop, S., Boers, F. & De Rycker, A. (eds.), 293–317.Google Scholar
Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T. & O'Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 29, 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from Cognitive Semantics. Applied Linguistics 17, 326–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal 73, 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Integrating Sociocultural Theory and Cognitive Linguistics in the second language classroom. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 303–318.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on Form in second language vocabulary acquisition. In Foster-Cohen, S. (ed.), EUROSLA Yearbook 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 223–250.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Roitblat-Rozovski, B. (in press). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61, 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach. Hove, UK: LTP.Google Scholar
Li, T. F. (2009). Metaphor, image, and image schemas in second language pedagogy. Cologne: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained (2nd edn). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics 26, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F. (2008a). Teaching chunks of language. Rum, Austria: Helbling Languages.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F. (2008b). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics 29, 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F. (2008c). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System 36, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Juchem-Grundmann, C. (eds.) (2010). Applied Cognitive Linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A. & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics 32.4, 408–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D. (2010). Going beyond patterns: Involving cognitive analysis in the learning of collocations. TESOL Quarterly 44, 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B. & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, F. & Littlemore, J. (2008). A discovery approach to figurative language learning with the use of corpora. In Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.), 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLennan, C. H. G. (1994). Metaphors and prototypes in the teaching and learning of grammar and vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts 13, 221–264.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. & Granger, S. (2008). Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, S. & Loewen, S. (2007). A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words. Language Teaching Research 11, 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: Dangers and guidelines. TESOL Journal 9, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 63, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A Dual Coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review 56, 282–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly 21, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (ed.) (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12, 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly 36, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X. & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 95, 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. (1994). Metaphors and language awareness. In Barbara, L. & Scott, M. (eds.), Reflections on language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 89–104.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skoufaki, S. (2008). Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two idiom presentation methods. In Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (eds.), 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staehr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31, 577–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A. & Eyckmans, J. (2010). Does ‘chunking’ foster chunk-uptake? In De Knop, S., Boers, F. & De Rycker, A. (eds.), 99–117.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review 50, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, R. & Lew, R. (2011). The role of imagery in dictionaries of idioms. Applied Linguistics 32, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research 13, 138–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive Linguistics and second language instruction. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition. New York/London: Routledge, 456–488).Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In Achard, M. & Niemeier, S. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 257–280).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., Mueller, C. M. & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review 23, 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. & Lowie, W. (2003). Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning 53, 547–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System 25, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning 59, 335–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. (ed.) (2010). Perspectives on formulaic language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly 44, 250–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar