No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BAAL/CUP Seminars 2010
Academic writing in the 21st century: Theories and methods for investigating, describing and explaining academic texts and literacy practices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2011
Extract
The Open University, Milton Keynes, 21 April 2010
This seminar, organised by Caroline Coffin and Jim Donohue (both from the Open University, UK), took the form of a day of dialogue between invited experts and other interested parties, including academic writing practitioners, researchers and postgraduate students. The invited speakers were asked to form panels representing either Academic Literacies or Systemic Functional Linguistics.
- Type
- Research in Progress
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
Donohue, J. (2009). Using the Ph.D. thesis introduction as a heuristic device for supporting the writing of a thesis. Writing & Pedagogy 1.2, 195–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. (2008). Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research: Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’. Written Communication 25.3, 353–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Special issue – New directions in academic literacies. Journal of Applied Linguistics 4.1, 5–32.Google Scholar
Ravelli, L. J. & Ellis, R. A. (eds.) (2004). Analysing academic writing: Contextual frameworks. London: Continuum.Google Scholar