Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:04:14.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William Labov & David Fanshel, Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

Review products

William Labov & David Fanshel, Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jürgen Streeck
Jürgen Streeck
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Germanistik, Freie Universität Berlin, 1000 West Berlin 33. Germany(BDR)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1980 , pp. 117 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review 15 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and Responses in Children's Speech. Journal of Child Language 2: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G.. (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers from the Seventh Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 63–84.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1971). Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 4: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J.. (1968). A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Report on Cooperative Research Project 3288. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated action and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5(6): 904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. (1977). Memory and attention. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., & Danehy, J. J.. (1960). The first five minutes. Ithaca, New York: Paul Martineau.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, J. (ed), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloll, E. A. (1978). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In Dressler, W. U. (ed.), Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M. & Gelman, R.. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the society for research in child development 38 (5). serial no. 152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, A.R. (ed.) (1968). The philosophy of action. London: Oxford.Google Scholar