Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:17:49.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To tell it directly or not: Coding transparency and corruption in Malagasy political oratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

JENNIFER L. JACKSON
JENNIFER L. JACKSON*
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Toronto19 Russell StreetToronto, Ontario M5S 2S2, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses stylistic and contextual variations in the political oratory (kabary politika) of urban Madagascar. New imported oratorical styles and older styles of kabary represent competing linguistic markets where political leaders field broader issues of political modernity, fighting government corruption through reforms toward transparency. Kabary has become the object of criticism in models for transparent government practice. This has affected the way leaders speak to and about the country, reifying a moral structure arguing what constitutes truth and how speakers understand language as conveying that truth. In this respect, this article describes linguistic and metalinguistic encodings of transparency versus corruption in the political communication styles of highland Malagasy political orators. It looks at how the rhetorical modes of an urban polity are reorganized in ways that reshape vernacular epistemologies of truth in language and shift the production of particular publics and their access to participation in political process. (Madagascar, kabary, oratory, democracy, linguistic variation, language ideology, truth and ethics, public opinion, public culture)*

Type
Research Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 47 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:38–59.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles (2000). Language philosophy as language ideology. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 139–204. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, William (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice (1971). Placing the dead: Tombs, ancestral villages and kinship organization in Madagascar. London & New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice (1975). Political language and oratory in traditional society. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald L., & Myers, Fred R. (1984). Dangerous words: Language and politics in the Pacific. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Caton, Steven (1990). “Peaks of Yemen I summon”: Poetry as cultural practice in a north Yemeni tribe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, & Comaroff, John L. (1999). Civil society and the political imagination in Africa: Critical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1984). Lauga and Talanoaga: two speech genres in a Samoan political event. In Brenneis, D. & Myers, F. (eds.), Dangerous words: Language and politics in the Pacific, 217–42. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1994). From grammar to politics: Linguistic anthropology in a western Samoan village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, James W. (1991). Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fliegelman, Jay (1993). Declaring independence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies. In Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K. & Kroskrity, P. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 317–32. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Danna (2002). In kabary, the point is to avoid the point. Christian Science Monitor. retrieved 9 May 2002 from http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/woaf.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hasty, Jennifer (2005). The pleasures of corruption: Desire and discipline in Ghanaian political culture. Cultural Anthropology 20:271–301.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane, & Mannheim, Bruce (1992). Language and worldview. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:381–406.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Charles (2006). The ethical soundscape: Cassette sermons and islamic counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta (2005). On the enchantment of the state: Indian thought on the role of the state in the narrative of modernity. European Journal of Sociology 46:263–96.Google Scholar
Marsden, George (2006). Fundamentalism and American culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review 85:77–96.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1975). A sliding sense of obligatoriness: The polystructure of Malagasy oratory. In her Political language and oratory in traditional society, 93–112. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1996). Norm-makers, norm-breakers: Uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In Brenneis, D. L. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology, 81–98. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Paley, Julia (2001). Marketing democracy: Power and social movements in post-dictatorship Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle (1980). Knowledge and passion: Ilongot conceptions of self and social life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle (1984). Words that are moving. In her Dangerous words: Language and politics in the Pacific, 131–60. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Todd, & West, Harry (2003). Transparency and conspiracy: Ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1998a). Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Brenneis, D. & Macaulay, R. (eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology, 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1998b). Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 27:401–26.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2001). The limits of awareness. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 382–401. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Talking politics: The substance of style from Abe to “W”. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture 14:91–124.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar