No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Susan Ehrlich, Point of view: A linguistic analysis of literary style. London and New York: Routledge, 1990. Pp. ix + 132.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0047404500015335/resource/name/firstPage-S0047404500015335a.jpg)
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
REFERENCES
Banfield, A. (1973). Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10: 1–39.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dry, H. (1977). Syntax and point of view in Jane Austen's Emma. Studies in Romanticism 16: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1978). The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 43–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1980). Temporal structures in discourse. In Breklo, H., Heringer, H., Rohrer, C., Vater, H., & Werner, O. (eds.), Time, tense, and quantifiers. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1981). Semantic and syntactic constraints on temporal interpretation. In Tedeschi, P. & Zaenen, A. (eds.), Tense and aspect. (Syntax and Semantics 14). New York: Academic Press. 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1982). Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1981. Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 177–95.Google Scholar