Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:36:43.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social structure and peer terminology in a black adolescent gang*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Teresa Labov
Teresa Labov
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the social organization of adolescent groups may not have always taken into account sufficiently the dual reality of the groups in which much of the youths' activities occur. Peer terminology is useful in locating and describing the associational patterns and activities of the youth, but only if the range of possible terms is considerably broadened. It was found in a study of a Harlem street gang that such language may appear ambiguous, but when studied systematically in the interaction between interviewer and members, the misunderstandings become transparent. Peer terminological practices can be used to provide further knowledge of the reality of the social organization of adolescent primary groups. (Peer terminology, primary groups, misunderstanding, interviewing, juvenile delinquency, urban black adolescent language; verbal tags.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 391 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. ([1909] 1962). Social organization. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Dines, E. R. (1980). Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9:13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folb, E. A. (1980). Runnin' down some lines: The language and culture of black teenagers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Horowitz, R., & Schwartz, G. (1974). Honor, normative ambiguity, and gang violence. American Sociological Review 39: 238–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. W. (1968). Impressions of juvenile gang members. Adolescence 3: 53–77.Google Scholar
Labov, T. (1969). When is the Jets? Social ambiguity in peer terminology. Unpublished Master's Essay, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. Language in Society 2: 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non -standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. USOE Final Report, Research Project No. 3288.Google Scholar
Lerman, P. (1967). Argot, symbolic deviance and subcultural delinquency. American Sociological Review 32: 209–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L. (ed.) (1960). The sociometric reader. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1970). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In Emmet, D. & Macintyre, A. (eds.), Sociological theory and philosophical analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G., & Merten, D. (1967). The language of adolescence: An anthropological approach to the youth culture. American Journal of Sociology 72: 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups: Explorations into conformity and deviation of adolescents. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Short, J. F. (1968). Comment on Lerman's “Gangs, networks and subcultural delinquency.” American Journal of Sociology 73: 513–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiwary, K. M. (1968). The echo-word construction in Bhojpuri. Anthropological Linguistics 10: 32–38.Google Scholar
Willmott, P. (1966). Adolescent boys of East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar