Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T22:02:34.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensing the rhythms of everyday life: Temporal integration and tactile translation in the Seattle Deaf-Blind community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

Terra Edwards
Terra Edwards
Affiliation:
The University of California, Berkeley, Department of Anthropology, 232 Kroeber Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-3710, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is concerned with how social actors establish relations between language, the body, and the physical and social environment. The empirical focus is a series of interactions between Deaf-Blind people and tactile signed language interpreters in Seattle, Washington. Many members of the Seattle Deaf-Blind community were born deaf and, due to a genetic condition, lose their vision slowly over the course of many years. Drawing on recent work in language and practice theory, I argue that these relations are established by Deaf-Blind people through processes of integration whereby continuity between linguistic, embodied, and social elements of a fading visual order are made continuous with corresponding elements in an emerging tactile order. In doing so, I contribute to current attempts in linguistic anthropology to model the means by which embodied, linguistic, and social phenomena crystallize in relational patterns to yield worlds that take on the appearance of concreteness and naturalness. (Classifiers, Deaf-Blind, integration, interpretation, language and embodiment, practice, rhythm, Tactile American Sign Language, tactility)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 29 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronoff, Mark; Meir, Irit; Padden, Carol; & Sandler, Wendy (2000). Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Emmorey, 53–84.Google Scholar
Arthur-Kelley, Michael; Foreman, Phil; Bennett, Deone; & Pascoe, Sue (2008). Interaction, inclusion and students with profound and multiple disabilities: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 8:161–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. (1965). How to do things with words. (The William James lectures.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin (1996). Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Boston: Boston University dissertation.Google Scholar
Bauman, H-Dirksen L.; Nelson, Jennifer L.; & Rose, Heidi M. (eds.) (2006). Signing the body poetic. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile (1971a). The nature of the linguistic sign. In Benveniste, Emile, Problems in general linguistics, 43–48. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile (1971b). The semiology of language. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Bienvenu, MJ (2008). Queer as Deaf: Intersections. In Bauman, H-Dirksen L. (ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, 264–73. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2(3):153–64.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourquin, Eugene, & Sauerburger, Dona (2005). Teaching Deaf-Blind people to communicate and interact with the public: Critical issues for travelers who are Deaf-Blind. RE:View 37(3):109–16.Google Scholar
Bruce, Susan (2005). The application of Werner and Kaplan's concept of “distancing” to children who are Deaf-Blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 99:464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueggemann, Brenda Jo (2008). Think-between: A Deaf studies commonplace book. In Bauman, H-Dirksen L. (ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, 177–88. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl (1934/1999). Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1985). Methodological preliminaries. In Katz, Jerrold (ed.), The philosophy of linguistics Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Heather (2010). We are the same but different: Navigating African American and Deaf cultural identities. Seattle: University of Washington dissertation.Google Scholar
Collins, Steven, & Petronio, Karen (1998). What happens in Tactile ASL? In Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in Deaf communities, 18–37. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Steven, & Petronio, Karen (2004). Adverbial morphemes in Tactile American Sign Language. Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute and University dissertation.Google Scholar
Correa-Torres, Silvia Maria (2008). Communication opportunities for students with deafblindness in specialized and inclusive settings: A pilot study. RE:View 39:197–205.Google Scholar
Dammeyer, Jesper (2009). Congenitally Deafblind children and cochlear implants: Effects on communication. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14(2):278–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, Margaret (1969). Helen Keller. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand (1915/1972). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lindsay (2008). The burden of racism and audism. In Bauman, H-Dirksen L. (ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, 235–50. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, William (2000). Rethinking classifiers: The morpho-phonemics of proforms. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Edwards, Terra (2008). Iconicity social types and referent projections in ASL. Paper presented at Deaf Studies Today! Orem, Utah.Google Scholar
Edwards, Terra (2010). Pointing as ostensive referential practice in the Seattle Deaf-Blind community. Paper presented at The International Society for Gesture Studies, Frankfurt/Oder, Germany.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen (ed.) (2003). Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, & Herzig, Melissa (2003). Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In Emmorey, 222–46.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. (2009). Composite utterances. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: SIGNUM.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, & Sweetser, Eve (eds.) (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, & Turner, Mark (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22:133–87.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, & Turner, Mark (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic.
Fischer, Susan (1975). Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Li, Charles (ed.), Word order and word order change Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Mindy (2002). Deaf-Blind interpreting: Interpreters' use of negation in Tactile American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 2(2):169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeburg, Ernest (2001). The education of Laura Bridgman: First deaf and blind person to learn language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedner, Michele (2010). Biopower, biosociality, and community formation: How biopower is constitutive of the Deaf community. Sign Language Studies 10(3):336–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitter, Elisabeth (2001). The imprisoned guest: Samuel Howe and Laura Bridgman, the original deaf-blind girl. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1972). The neglected situation. In Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.), Language and social context: Selected readings, 61–66. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1971). Meaning. In Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A. (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, 53–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1989). Logic and conversation. Studies in the way of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette (1996). A typology of classifiers: Issues and perspectives. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Institute, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (2005a). Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology 46:191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F. (2005b). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F. (2009). Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41:10–24.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (2010). Converting words: Maya in the age of the cross. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy (2002). The language myth in western culture. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Dorothy (1998). Helen Keller: A life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomosello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Marleen J.; Riksen-Walraven, Marianne J.; & van Dijk, Jan P. M. (2003). Toward a diagnostic intervention model for fostering harmonious interactions between Deaf-Blind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 97:197–214.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy (1985). Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation, syntax, and discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Kelley, Arlene Blumenthal (2008). Where Is Deaf HERstory? In Bauman, H-Dirksen L. (ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, 251–73. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2008). Orientation. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space time and everyday life. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1963). Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. (2000). Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In McNeill, David (ed.), Language and gesture, 331–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Nigel (ed.) (2006). Language and history: Integrationist perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lucy, John (2000). Systems of nominal classification: A concluding discussion. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 326–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luscak, Raymond (1993). Eyes of desire: A Deaf gay lesbian reader. Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
Mesch, Johanna (2001). Tactile sign language: Turn taking and questions in signed conversations of Deaf-Blind people. Wien: Signum.Google Scholar
Metzger, Melanie; Fleetwood;, Earl & Collins, Stephen D. (2004). Discourse genre and linguistic mode: Interpreter influences in visual and tactile interpreted interaction. Sign Language Studies 4:118–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol; Bahan, Benjamin; MacLaughlin, Dawn; Lee, Robert G.,; & Kegl, Judy (1998). Realizations of syntactic agreement in American Sign Language: Similarities between the clause and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 52:191–226.Google Scholar
Nelson, Betty (2005). Creating positive outcomes for Deafblind youth and young adults: A personal futures planning Ttansition model. RE:View 36:173–80.Google Scholar
Nuccio, Jelica, & Smith, Theresa B. (2010). Providing and receiving support services: Comprehensive training for Deaf-Blind persons and their support service providers. Seattle, WA, ms.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, & Humphries, Tom (2005). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasnis, Ila (ed.) (1998). Cultural and language diversity and the Deaf experience. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Amy T. (2009). Orientation and mobility with persons who are deaf-blind: An initial examination of single-subject design research. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 103(6):372–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1955). The principles of phenomenology. In Buchler, Justus (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 74–97. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen, & Dively, Valeria (2006). YES, #NO, visibility, and variation in ASL and Tactile ASL. Sign Language Studies 7(1):57–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizner, Howard; Klima, Edward S.; & Bellugi, Ursula (1987). What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian (2005). Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Sauerburger, Donna (1993). Independence without sight or sound: Suggestions for practitioners working with Deaf-Blind adults. New York: AFB Press.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam (2003). Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Emmorey, 3–34.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam; Jones, Caroline; & Burnham, Denis (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10:272–90.Google Scholar
Schick, Brenda S. (1990). Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1:15–40.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.; Hoiting, N.; Anthony, M.; Biederman, Y.; Kuntze, M.; Lindert, R.; Pyers, J.; Thuman, H.; & Weinberg, A. (2000). The meaningful use of handshapes by child and adult learners: A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” Paper presented at The Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages Workshop, La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
Smith, Theresa B. (1994). Guidelines: Practical tips for working & socializing with Deaf-Blind people. Silver Spring, MD: Linstock Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Kathleen (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael (1999). Integrationist linguistics in the context of 20th century theories of langauge: Some connections and projections. Language and Communication 19:97–108.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike (2003). “Classificatory” constructions in Indo-Pakistani Sign Language: Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In Emmorey, 113–41.Google Scholar