Adelung, J. H., & Vater, J. S. (1806–1817). Mithridares, oder aligemeine Sprachenkunde. 4 vols. Berlin: Vossische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Aebischer, P. (1978). Etudes de stratigraphie linguistique. (Romanica Helvetica 87.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Alvar, M., Llorente, A., & Salvador, G. (1961–1973). Atlas ling¨ístico y etnogrdfico de Andalucia. 6 vols. Granada: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar

Ascoli, G. I. (1873). Saggi ladini. Archivio glottologico italiano 1: 1–556; folding map.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variations and linguistic theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Barrenechea, A. M., & Orecchia, T. 1970–1971). La ducplicación de objetos directos e indirectos en el espanol hablado en Buenos Aires. Romance Philology 24: 58–83.Google Scholar

Bartoli, M. (1925). Introduzione alla neolinguistica: Princìpi-scopi-metodi. Biblioteca dell' «Archivum Romanicum» 2:12. Genève: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar

Bartoli, M. & Vidossi, G. (1945). Alle porte orientali d'Italia: Dialetti e lingue della Venezia Giulia (Friuli e Istria); Stratficazioni linguisriche in Istria; con un'appendice di testi dialettali; map. Torino: Gheroni.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1975). The dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, B. (1948). A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24:3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, B. (1970). Bernard Bloch on Japanese. Roy, Andrew Miller, ed. (Yale Linguistic Series.) New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, B. & Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of linguistic analysis. Special publication of the Linguistic Society of America. Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1927). On recent work in general linguistics. Modern Philology 25: 211–30. Reprinted in Hockett, 1970. 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1944). Review of Bodmer, F., The loom of language in American Speech 19: 211–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodmer, F. (1944). The loom of language, ed., Hogben, L.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Borrego, Nieto J. (1981). Sociolingüística rural; investigación en Villadepena de Santiago. (Acta Salmanticensia: Filosofía y Letras 120.) Salamanca: Ediciones de la Universidad.Google Scholar

Bottiglioni, G. (1933–1942). Atlante lingüístico etnográfico italiano della Corsica. 11 vols. Pisa.Google Scholar

Bottiglioni, G. (1952). Dizionario delle parlate corse; indice dell' ALEIC. Modena: Società tipografica modenese.Google Scholar

Brown, G. (1972). Phonological rules and dialect variation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buck, C. D. (1904). A sketch of the linguistic conditions of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago 1:6. 97–114.)Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1957). The Linguistic Survey of Scotland. Orbis 6:105–21.Google Scholar

Cedergren, H. C. J. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic forces in Panama. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectolagy. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, M. (1973). Cross-dialectal comparison: A case study and some theoretical considerations. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1:38–63.Google Scholar

Cochrane, G. R. (1959). The Australian English vowels as a diasystem. Word 15:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coelho, F. A. (1871).Sobre a língua portuguesa. In Frei, Domingos Vieira, Grande Dicionário Portuguêes. ou Tesouro da Língua Portuguesa. I:ix–ccxlviii. Porto: E. Chardron & B. H. de Morais. etc.Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. (1981). Dialecto. nivel y estilo de lengua. Lingüística espanola actual 3:1–32.Google Scholar

Cuervo, R. J. (1867–1872). Apuntaciones críticas sobre el lenguaje logotano. Bogotá: A. M. Guarín.Rev. 4th ed., Chartres: Imprimeries de Durand, 1885; rev. 6th ed., Paris: R. Roger & F. Chernoviz. 1914; rev. 9th ed., Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 1955.Google Scholar

Dauzat, A. (1955). La méthode des nouveaux atlas linguistiques de la France. Orbis 4: 22–31.Google Scholar

Deanović, M. (1938). Per un atlante e un dizionario etimologico delle voci mediterranee. Vox Romanica 3:315–20.Google Scholar

De, Camp D. (1953). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

De Camp, D. (1958, 1959). The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. Orbis 7:372–91; 8:54–77.Google Scholar

De Gorog, R. (1982). Review of Aid, F. M., Resnick, M. C., & Saciuk, B. (eds.) 1975 Colloquium on Hispanic Linguistics; and G. E. Scavnicky (ed.), Dialectología hispanoamericana: Estudios actuales. Romance Philology 36: 242–53.Google Scholar

Duraffour, A. (1926). Trois phénomènes de nivellement phonétique en franco-provençal. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 27 (1): 68–80.Google Scholar

Duraffour, A. & Jeanton, G. (1935). L'habitation paysanne en Bresse: études d'ethnographie …étude linguistique. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar

Elcock, W. D. (1938). De quelques affinités phonétiques entre l'aragonais et le béarnais. Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar

Elizaincin, A. (1976). The emergence of bilingual dialects on the Uruguayan–Brazilian border. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The Social Dimensions of Dialectology): 123–33.Google Scholar

Ellis, A. J. (1889). On early English pronunciation, 5: The existing phonology of English dialects. London: Trübner.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flórez, L. (1957). Habla y cultura popular en Antioquia: materiales para un estudio. Bogoté: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Flórez, L. (1962). Léxico de la casa popular urbana en Bolívar, Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Flórez, L. (1965). El español hablado en Santander. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Flórez, L. & Buesa, Oliver T. (1954 [5–6]). El atlas lingüísico-etnográfico de Colombia (ALEC). Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Flutre, L.-F. (1972). Review of Duraffour, A., Glossaire des patois francoprovençaux, 1969. Romance Philology 26:157–63.Google Scholar

Fontanella, de Weinberg M. B. (1979). Dinámica social de un cambio lingüísrico. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar

Frank, Y. H. (1948). The speech of New York City. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Frings, T. (1913). Srudien zur Dialektgeographie des Niederrheins zwischen D¨sseldorf undAachen. (Deutsche Dialektgeographie 5 Wrede, F., ed.) Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar

Frings, T. (1924). Rheinische Sprachgeschichte. Essen: G. D. Baedeker.Google Scholar

Frings, T. & Vandenheuvel, J. (1921). Die südniederländischen Mundarten: Texte, Untersuchungen, Karten. (Deutsche Dialektgeographie 16.) Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar

Gamillscheg, E. (1928). Die Sprachgeographie und ihre Ergebnisse für die allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. Bielefeld and Leipzig: Velhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar

Gamillscheg, E. & Spitzer, L. (1915). Die Bezeichnungen der ‘Klette’ im Galloromanischen. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Gil(I), A. (1619). Logonomia Anglica. qua genus sermofacilius addiscitur. London: I. Beale.Google Scholar

Gilliéron, J., & Roques, M. (1912). Études de géographie linguistique, d' après l' atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar

Gregg, R. J. (1964). Scotch–Irish urban speech in Ulster. In Adams, G. B.. Ulster dialects: An introductory symposium. Belfast: Ulster Folk Museum.Google Scholar

Hall, R. A. Jr. (1942). Latin -ks- in Italian and its dialects. Language 18:117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haust, J., & Remacle, L. (1953– ). Atlas linguistique de la Wallonie. Tableau géographique des parlers de la Belgique romane d' aprés l' enquête de J. Haust et des enquêtes complémentaires. 4 vols. Liège: H. Vaillant-Carmanne, for: Centre universitaire de dialectologie wallonne et Bibliotheque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres (Liège).Google Scholar

Herzog, M. I. (1967). Bibliography of Uriel Weinreich. Language 43: 607–10.Google Scholar

Herzog, P. (1916). Die Bezeichnung der täglichen Mahlzeiten in den romanischen Sprachen und Dialekten: eine onomasiologische Untersuchung. Zürich dissertation.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. H. (1970). A LeonardBloomfield anthology. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hoijer, H. (ed.) (1965). Language history from [Leonard] Bloomfield's “Language”. (1933 edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Hotzenköcherle, R. (1962– ). Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz, vol. I: Einfūhrungsband; Lautgeographie: Vokalqualität. Bem: Francke.Google Scholar

Houck, C. L. (1968). Methodology of an urban speech survey. (Leeds Studies in English [New Series] 2.)Google Scholar

Hsieh, H-I. (1973). A new method of dialect subgrouping. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1:64–92.Google Scholar

Hubbell, A. F. (1950). The pronunciation of English in New York City. Consonants and vowels. Columbia University dissertation. New York: King's Crown Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (ed.) (1964). Language and culture in society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

lordan, I., & Orr, J. (1937). An introduction to Romance linguistics: Its schools and scholars. Oxford: Blackwell. Rev. 2nd ed., 1970; see also Posner (1970).Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1936). Aspects géographiques du langage: conférences faites au Collège de France (déc. 1933). Paris: E. Droz.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1940). Der Rumänische Sprachatlas [ALR, ALRM; S. Puşcariu] und die Struktur des dacorumānischen Sprachgebiets. Vox Romanica 5: 49–86.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1954–1955). Grossräumige und kleinräumige Sprachatlanten. Vox Romanica 14: 1–61.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1956–1957). The birthmark in folk belief, language, literature, and fashion. Romance Philology 10: 307–42.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1960). Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz: Index. Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. (1965). Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungen und Erlebnisse. Neue Folge. Heinimann, S., editor. (Romanica Helvetica 75.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Jaberg, K. & Jud, J. (1928–1940). Sprach- und Sachatlas italiens und der Südschweiz (=AIS), 8 vols Zofingen: Ringier.Google Scholar

Kahane, H. R. (1941). Designations of the cheek in the Italian dialects. Language 17: 212–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahane, H. R. (1981). Graeca et Romanica: Scripra Selecta. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar

Kahane, H., & Kahane, R. (1976–1977). Lingua franca; The story of a term. Romance Philology 30: 25–41.Google Scholar

Kjederqvist, J. (1904). The dialect of Pewsey (Wiltshire). In Transactions of the Philological Society 1903–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, E. (1966). Phonological atlas of the northern region. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Kuhn, A. (1935). Der hocharagonesische Dialekt.Revue de linguistique romane 11: 1–312.Google Scholar

Kuhn, A. (1947–1948). Sechzig Jahre Sprachgeographie in der Romania. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 1: 25–63.Google Scholar

Kuhn, A. (1951). Romanische Philologie, I: Die romanischen Sprachen. (Wissenschaftliche Forschungsberichte, Geisteswissenschaftliche Reihe 8.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Kurath, H. et al. , (1939). Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar

Kurath, H. (1965). Die Lautgestalt einer Kärtner Mundart und ihre Geschichte. Supplement 2 (New Series) to Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar

Kurath, H. (1939–1943). Linguistic atlas of New England. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lavandera, B. (1981). Sociolinguistics. In Posner, R. & Green, J. N. (eds.), Trends in Romance linguistics and philology. 2; Synchronic Romance linguistics. 129–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J. (1967). Speech variation in a piedmont community: Postvocatic /r/. international Journal of American Linguistics 33:4:2 (Explorations in sociolinguistics; Lieberson, S. ed.) 76–98.Google Scholar

Lieberson, S. (ed.) (1967). Explorations in sociolinguistics = International Journal of American Linguistics 33:4:2 ( = Publication 44).Google Scholar

Livingston, C. H. (1957). Skein-winding reels: Studies in word history and etymology. (University of Michigan Publications, Language and Literature, 29.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

López, Morales H. (ed.) (1978). Corrientes actuales en la dialectología del Caribe hispánico. Actas de un simposio. Universidad de Puerto Rico: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar

López, Morales H. & Vaquero de Ramírez, M. (eds.) (forthcoming), Actas del l Congreso Internacional sobre el espaňol de América. Río Piedras: Editorial Universitaria de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1967a). Uriel Weinreich (1926–1967). Language 43: 604–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1967b). Each word has a history of its own. Glossa 1 137–49.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1968–1969). Necrology: Uriel Weinreich–Jakob Jud's last student. Romance Philology 22:128–32.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1970). Patterns of derivational affixalion in the Cabraniego dialect of East-Central Asturian. (University of California Publications, Linguistics 64.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1971–1972). A straightforward report on the latest “crisis” in Romance linguistics. Romance Philology 25:216–24.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1972). Linguistics and philology in Spanish America: A survey (1925–70). (lanua Linguarum: Series Minor 97.) The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1976). From Romance philology through dialect geography to sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The social dimension of dialectology): 59–84.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1978–1979). Editorial comment: A partial return to Bernardino Biondelli? Romance Philology 32: 502–04.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Y. (1982). Infinitive endings, conjugation classes, nominal derivational suffixes, and vocalic gamuts in Romance. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 17:15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. (Bibliotheca Romanica 1:10.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Martinet, A. (1956). La description phonologique, avec application au parler franco-provençal d'Hauteville (Savoie). (Publications romanes et francaises 56.) Genève: Droz.Google Scholar

McDavid, R. I. (1948). Postvocalic /r/ in South Carolina: A social analysis: American Speech 23:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, A. (1952). Introduction to a survey of Scottish dialects. Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar

Menéndez, Pidal R. (1952). Toponimia prerrománica hispana. (Biblioteca romànica hispànica 2:9.) Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Moulton, W. G. (1960). The short-vowel systems of Northern Switzerland: A study in structural methodology. Word 16:155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moulton, W. G. (1968). Structural dialectology. Language 44:451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Navarro, (Tomás) T. (1948). El espaňol en Puerto Rico. Contribución a la geografia lingüistica hispanoamericana. Río Piedras, P. R.: Editorial de Ia Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar

Navarro, (Tomás) T. (1975). Capitulos de geografia linguistica de Ia Peninsula lbérica. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

[Navarro, (Tomás) T. & Sanchis, Guarner M.] (1962). Atlas ling¨istico de la Península Ibérica, I: Fonética, I. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar

Newton, B. (1972). The generative interpretation of dialect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Orbis: Bulletin international de documentation linguistique (1952– ). Louvain: Centre international de dialectologie generale.Google Scholar

Orr, J. 1935 Memorandum [on a linguistic survey of Scotland]. Unpublished.Google Scholar

Orr, J. (1953). Words and sounds in English and French. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Orr, J. (1963). Essais d'étymologie et de philologie françaises. (Bibliotheque francaise et romane, Ser. A:4.) Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Orton, H. (1962). Survey of English dialects: Introduction. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar

Orton, H. & Wright, N. (1975). Word geography of England. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Orton, H. et al. , (1978). Linguistic atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Paris, G. (1888). Les parlers de France. Revue des patois gallo-romans 2:162–75.Google Scholar

Petyt, K. M. (1970). Emily Brontë and the Haworth dialect. Keighley: Yorkshire Dialect Society Publications.Google Scholar

Petyt, K. M. (1980). The study of dialect: An introduction to dialectology. (The Language Library.) London: André Deutsch Ltd.Google Scholar

Pickford, G. R. (1956). American linguistic geography: A sociological appraisal. Word 12:211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pop, S. (1950). La dialectologie: aperçu hisrorique et méthodes d'enquétes linguistiques. 2 vols. (Recueil de travaux d'histoire et de philologie 3. 38–39.) Louvain: Université.Google Scholar

Posner, R. (1970). Thirty years on. Supplement to 2nd ed. of lordan & Orr (1937). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pulgram, E. (1964). Structural comparison, diasystems, and dialectology. Linguistics 4:66–82.Google Scholar

Putnam, G. N., & O'Hern, E. M. (1955). The status significance of an isolated urban dialect. Language Dissertation 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Revue des patois gallo-romans (1887–1992), Gilliéron, J. & abbé, Rousselot, eds. vols. Paris: H. Champion, etc.Google Scholar

Rona, J. P. (1976). The social dimension of dialectology. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 9 (The social dimension of dialectology): 7–22.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc.Google Scholar

Sarmiento, M. ([1754], 1973). Carálogo de voces y frases de la lengua gallega, Pensado, J. L., ed. (= Obras lingilisticas del Padre Sarmienro, 2). Acta Salmantina, Filosofla y Letras 72.)Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, Bally, C. & Sechehaye, A., eds. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar

Scheuermeier, P. (1920). Einige Bezeichnungen f¨r den Begrifj ‘Höhle’ in den romanischen Alpendialekten …; ein wortgeschichtlicher Beitrag zum Studium der alpinen Geländeausdr¨cke. Supplement 79 to Zeitschrfl f¨r romanische Philologie and Z¨urich dissertation.Google Scholar

Scheuermeier, P. & Boesch, P. (1934) Wasser- und Weingefässe im heutigen Italien. Sachkundliche Darsiellung auf Grund der Materialien des AIS. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Schmeller, J. A. (1821). Die Mundarten Bayerns, grammatisch dargesfeilt. M¨nchen: Thienemann.Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. (1872). Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Böhlau.Google Scholar

Schuchardt, H.(1885). Über die Lautgesetze; gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: R. Oppenheim.Google Scholar

Sievers, E. (1876). Grundz¨ge der Lautphysiologie. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. (in press). Review of Posner, R. & Green, J. N. (eds.), Trends in Romance linguistics and philology, 2: Synchronic Romance linguistics. To appear in Romance Philology.Google Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C.(in press). Review of Fontanella de Weinberg, M. B., Dinámica social de un cambio ling¨ísrico. To appear in Romance Philology.Google Scholar

Siverisen, E. (1960). Cockney phonology ]based on Oslo dissertation, 1951.] Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, E. (1957). On discreteness and continuity in structural dialectology. Word 13:44–59, to maps.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tappolet, E. (1895). Die romanischen Verwandrschaftsnamen, mit besonderer Ber¨cksichtigung der französischen und italienischen Mundarten. Em Beitrag zur vergleichenden Lexikologie. Strassburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, A. (1897). Essais de philologie française. Paris: E. Bouillon.Google Scholar

Thomas, A. (1902). Mélanges d'étymologie française. Université de Paris: Bibliothèque de la Faculté des Lettres 14. Pans: F. Alcan. Rev.2nd ed., Collection linguistique 22, Paris: H. Champion, 1927.Google Scholar

Thomas, A. (1904). Nouveaux essais de philologie française. Paris: E. Bouillon.Google Scholar

Thomas, A. R. (1973). The linguistic geography of Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1974a). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1974b). Sociolinguistics: An introduction. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ureland, P. S. (1978). Sprachkontakte im Nordseegebiet. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasiliu, E. (1966). Towards a generative phonology of Daco-Rumanian dialects. Journal of Linguistics 2: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasmer, M. (1960– ). Wörterbuch der russischen Gewässernamen. Osteuropa-Institut an der Freien Universit?t Berlin, Slavistische Veröffentlichungen 22. Berlin & Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Vasmer, M. (1962–1964). Russisches geographisches Namenbuch, Coper, I. & Bräuer, H., eds. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Wiesbaden: C. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Vidal de Battini, B. E. (1949). El habla rural de San Luis. (Biblioteca de dialectología hispanoamencana 7.) Buenos Aires: Instituto de Filología.Google Scholar

Viereck, W. (1966). Phonematische Analyse des Dialekts von Gateshead-upon-Tyne, Co. Durham, Hamburg: Cram & de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Wang, W. S-Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wartburg, W. von (1937). Betrachtungen ¨ber die Gliederung des Wortschatzes und die Gestaltung des Wörterbuchs. Zeitschrifl f¨r romanische Philologie 57: 296–312.Google Scholar

Wartburg, W. von (1956). Sinn und Aufgaben des französischen etymologischen Wörterbuches. In Von Sprache und Mensch – gesammelte Aufsätze. Bern: Francke. 166–77.Google Scholar

Weigand, G. (1909). Linguistischer Atlas des dacorumänischen Sprachgebietes. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar

Weinreich, M. (1955–1956). The Jewish languages of Romance stock and their relations to earliest Yiddish. Romance Philology 9: 403–28.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1954) Is a structural dialectology possible Word 10: 388–400 (= Linguistics Today, Martinet, A. & Weinreich, U., eds. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 2).Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (c. 1955–1965). Language and culture atlas of Ashkenazic Jewry. Unpublished.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U.(ed.) (1965, 1969). The field of Yiddish: Studies in folklore, language, and literature. 2ndand 3rd collections. The Hague; Mouton.Google Scholar

Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin; University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (1973). Jamaican pronunciation in London. Oxford; Blackwell.Google Scholar

Winteler, J. (1876). Die Kerenzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus, in ihren Grundz¨gen dargestelit. Leipzig; C. F. Winter.Google Scholar

Wrede, F., & Mitzka, W. (1926–1926). Deutscher Sprachatlas, auf Grund des von Georg Wenker begr¨ndeten Sprachatlas des Deutschen Reichs … Marburg; Elwert.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (1892). A grammar of the dialect of Windhill in the West Riding of Yorkshire. London; Kegan Paul; Trench; Tr¨bner.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (1898–1905). English dialect dictionary. London; Frowde.Google Scholar

Wright, J. T. (1966).Urban dialects; A consideration of method. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 33:232–47.Google Scholar