Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:12:34.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Philip Glenn, Laughter in interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2006

E. Cabell H. Gathman
Affiliation:
Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53703, [email protected]

Extract

Philip Glenn, Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xi, 190, Hb $75.00.

Drawing on extant research in conversation analysis (CA) and other fields, Glenn's entry in the “Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics” series is both an excellent introduction to CA for those outside the field and an interesting exploration of the social phenomenon of laughter. The first chapter gives a general survey of the research, which has often focused on the physicality of laughter and its relation to humor. Ultimately, however, the chapter suggests a function of laughter beyond expressing amusement: affiliation with co-participants in social interaction. In chap. 2, Glenn provides a helpful outline of CA. He emphasizes CA's focus on participants' perspectives and provides a cogent explanation for CA's meticulous transcription conventions with the example of silences, marked on CA transcripts in tenths of seconds. To leave them out, he argues, would be to assume from the beginning that silences in talk mean nothing (p. 37) – an idea that most competent talkers, let alone CA researchers, would reject out of hand.

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Haakana, Markku (2001). Laughter as a patient's resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text 21:187219.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance or declination. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 7998. New York: Irvington.
Jefferson, Gail; Sacks, Harvey; & Schegloff, Emanuel (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 152205. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lavin, Danielle, & Maynard, Douglas W. (2001). Standardization vs. rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review 66:453479.Google Scholar