Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T22:59:03.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing a remote state of incipient talk: Push-to-talk mobile radio interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2006

MARGARET H. SZYMANSKI AND ERIK VINKHUYZEN  and
PAUL M. AOKI AND ALLISON WOODRUFF
MARGARET H. SZYMANSKI AND ERIK VINKHUYZEN
Affiliation:
Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, [email protected]
PAUL M. AOKI AND ALLISON WOODRUFF
Affiliation:
Intel Research Berkeley, 2150 Shattuck Ave., Ste. 1300, Berkeley, CA 94704
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the organization of conversational interaction via push-to-talk mobile radios. Operating like long-range walkie-talkies, the mobile radios mediate a remote state of incipient talk; at the push of a button, speakers can initiate, engage, disengage, and reengage turn-by-turn talk. Eight friends used the mobile radios for one week; 50 of their conversational exchanges were analyzed using conversation analytic methods. The findings describe the contour of their conversational exchanges: how turn-by-turn talk is engaged, sustained, and disengaged. Similar to a continuing state of incipient talk in copresence, opening and closing sequences are rare. Instead, speakers engage turn-by-turn talk by immediately launching the purpose of the call. Speakers disengage turn-by-turn talk by orienting to the relevance of a lapse at sequence completion. Once engaged, the mobile radio system imposes silence between speakers' turns at talk, giving them a resource for managing a remote conversation amid ongoing copresent activities.We are grateful to Mimi and her friends for making it possible to collect this data. We also thank Jim Thornton, Marilyn Whalen, Paul Drew, Bob Moore and Luke Plurkowski for their helpful insights.

Keywords

continuing state of incipient talkconversation analysisreengaging and disengaging talkmobile radio communication
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 393 - 418
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoki, Paul M.; Romaine, Matthew; Szymanski, Margaret H.; Thornton, James D.; Wilson, Daniel; & Woodruff, Allison (2003). The Mad Hatter's cocktail party: A social mobile audio space supporting multiple simultaneous conversations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 425–32. New York: ACM Press.
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Heritage, John (1984) (eds.). Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bogdan, Cristian (2003). IT design for amateur communities. Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Button, Graham (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 251–77. Cambridge: Polity.
Gibbon, Dafydd (1981). Idiomaticity and functional variation: A case study of international amateur radio talk. Language in Society 10:21–42.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip J. (1995). Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of participant alignments through conversational laughter. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas (eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities, 43–56. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.
Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.
Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. Yrjö Engeström & David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work, 61–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Robert (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hutchby, Ian (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.
Jefferson, Gail (1988). Notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In Derek Roger & Peter Bull (eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Jefferson, Gail; Sacks, Harvey; & Schegloff, Emanuel (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee, (eds.), Talk and social organisation, 152–205. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lerner, Gene (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19:111–31.Google Scholar
Luff, Paul, & Heath, Christian (2002). Broadcast talk: Initiating calls through a computer-mediated technology. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35:337–66.Google Scholar
Mellinger, Wayne M. (1992). Talk-as-work: The case of paramedic calls for emergency field orders. In Gale Miller (ed.), Human service occupations and professions (Current research in occupations and professions, 7), 77–108. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Nardi, Bonnie A.; Whittaker, Steve; & Bradner, Erin (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 79–88. New York: ACM Press.
Nevile, Maurice (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
Orr, Julian E. (1995). Ethnography and organization learning: In pursuit of learning at work. In Cristina Zucchermaglio Sebastiano Bagnara & Susan U. Stucky (eds.), Organizational learning and technological change, 47–60. Berlin: Springer.
Raymond, Geoffrey (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in sequences of talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37:185–218.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50:696–735.Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert E. (2003). Conversational socializing on marine VHF radio: Adapting laughter and other practices to the technology in use. In Phillip J. Glenn Curtis D. LeBaron & Jenny S. Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction, 309–26. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075–95.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In David Sudnow, (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75–119. New York: Free Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 23–78. New York: Irvington.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9:111–52.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7:289–327.Google Scholar
Strub, Henry B. (1997). ConcertTalk: A weekend with a portable audio space. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 381–88. London: Chapman & Hall.
Szymanski, Margaret H. (1999). Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity. Language in Society 28:1–23.Google Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn R., & Zimmerman, Don H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:172–85.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Allison, & Aoki, Paul M. (2004). Push-to-talk social talk. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13(5–6):409–41.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 418–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.