Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:25:50.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Olson on literacy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

John Halverson
John Halverson
Affiliation:
Adlai Stevenson College, University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz, CA 95064
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Continuing a line of thought begun by Havelock and Goody, often called the “literacy thesis,” Olson has proposed in a series of articles several new ideas about how literacy may have altered human cognition to make modern scientific thinking possible. He attributes to literacy the development of explicit, autonomous prose, the ability to distinguish data from interpretation, and the growth of metalanguage, all of which are held to be essential to systematic thought. An examination of these proposals indicates that they lack sufficient evidence, coherence, and substance to support a case for any significant “cognitive consequences“ of literacy. (Literacy and cognition, orality and literacy)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 619 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bainton, R. H. (1956). The age of the Reformation. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982). Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleicher, J. (1980). Contemporary hermeneutics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dillenberger, J. (ed.) (1961). Martin Luther: Selections from his writings. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles, and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in History and Society 5:304–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griaule, M. (1965). Conversations with Ogotemmeli. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review 66:377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. (1970). Biblical exegesis in the early church. In Ackroyd, P. R. & Evans, C. F. (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Bible. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 412–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E. (1973). Prologue to Greek literacy. Lectures in memory of Louise Taft Semple, second series, 1966–1971. Cincinnati: University of Oklahoma Press for the University of Cincinnati Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. (1976). Origins of western literacy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Hooykaas, R. (1973). Religion and the rise of modern science. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1981). In vain I tried to tell you. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGiffert, A. C. (1932). A history of Christian thought. Vol. 1. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review 47:257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1985). Introduction. In Olson, D. R., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–15.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology 27:109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1987). An introduction to understanding literacy. Interchange 18:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1989). Literate thought. In Leong, C. K. & Randhawa, B. S. (eds.), Understanding literacy and cognition. New York: Plenum. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1990). Talking about text: How literacy contributes to thought. Journal of pragmatics 14:705–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. (1977). Ancient Mesopotamia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, H. W. (1967). The Greek oracles. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Parke, H. W., & Wormell, D. E. W. (1956). The Delphic oracle. Vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic. 223–55.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11:203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, B. (1952). The study of the Bible in the middle ages. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Torrance, N., & Olson, D. R. (1987). Development of metalanguage and the acquisition of literacy: A progress report. Interchange 18:136–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar