Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:21:24.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

ALESSANDRO DURANTI
ALESSANDRO DURANTI
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the basis of data collected during a year-long study of a Congressional campaign in California in the mid-1990s, this article uses semantic, pragmatic, and narrative analysis to show how candidates for political office construct and defend the coherence of their actions, including their choice to run for office. First, semantic and pragmatic analysis is used to discuss two charges of lack of coherence against one candidate. Second, three discursive strategies used by candidates for building existential coherence are identified: (i) constructing a narrative of belonging; (ii) casting the present as a natural extension of the past; and (iii) exposing potential contradictions in order to show how to solve them. After examining the extent to which each strategy is common across candidates and situations, it is shown that candidates who frame themselves as “independent” tend to use these strategies more than those who choose to identify more closely with a party's platform and ideology.The research on which this article is based was in part supported by two small grants from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1996–1997 and 1997–1998, and by a John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship supplemented by funds from UCLA during the 1999–2000 academic year. An earlier version of this article was presented at the Discourse Lab in the Department of Anthropology at UCLA on 2 June 2004. I thank my colleagues and students for their generous feedback and comments. Among my research assistants over the years, special thanks go to Jeff Storey, Sarah Meacham, and Jennifer Reynolds for their help in transcribing the talk in dozens of videotapes I recorded. I am also indebted to Anjali Browning for her careful reading of the first draft of this article. Some of the data and ideas presented in this article were first introduced in a number of seminars, workshops, and conferences at the University of Rome “La Sapienza,” the University of Florence, and the University of California at Santa Barbara. I would like to thank the participants in those events for their engagement with this material and their comments. I am also grateful to Jane Hill, former editor of Language in Society, and three anonymous reviewers for specific suggestions on how to improve the organization and content of the article. A number of people made the project on which this article is based possible and a rewarding experience. First and foremost, I am deeply indebted to the late Walter Capps and to his wife Lois Capps – now Rep. Lois Capps (D-California) – and to their extended family for letting me enter their home and giving me access to their lives as they experienced an extraordinary series of events. I am also very grateful to Walter's brother, Doug Capps, who was Walter's campaign manager in 1996 and has continued over the years to be my liaison with the rest of the Capps family. Others members of the Capps-for-Congress campaign staff I could rely on for information include Bryant Wieneke, always most generous with his time, Steve Boyd, Thu Fong, and Lindsey Capps. After Walter Capps's death, I benefited from conversations with Capps's colleague and friend Richard Hecht, professor and former chair of the Department of Religious Studies at UCSB. I am also grateful to the 1995–1996 Independent candidate Steven Wheeler, who, in June 1998, consented to meet with me and to being interviewed. This project was born out of conversations with Walter Capps's daughter Lisa while she was a graduate student at UCLA. She remained a strong supporter of my efforts to capture her father's adventure in politics after she accepted a position in psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, and even during the last year of her life, as she struggled with cancer. This article is dedicated to her memory.

Keywords

political discourseU.S. political campaignsnarrative analysisconflictcoherence of the self
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 467 - 497
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloch, M. (1975). Political language and oratory in traditional society. London: Academic Press.
Brenneis, Donald (1978). The matter of talk: Political performance in Bhatgaon. Language in Society 7:159–70.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald, & Myers, Fred (1984) (eds.). Dangerous words: Language and politics in the Pacific. New York: New York University Press.
Capps, Walter H. (1976). Hope against hope: Molton [i.e. Moltmann] to Merton in one decade. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Capps, Walter H. (1982). The unfinished war: Vietnam and the American conscience. Boston: Beacon. 2nd ed., 1990.
Capps, Walter H. (1983). The monastic impulse. New York: Crossroad.
Capps, Walter H. (1989) (ed.). Thomas Merton: Preview of the Asian journey. New York: Crossroad.
Capps, Walter H. (1990). The new religious right: Piety, patriotism, and politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Conte, Maria-Elizabeth (1988). Condizioni di coerenza: Ricerche di linguistica testuale. Florence: Nuova Italia.
Duranti, Alessandro (1994). From grammar to politics: Linguistic anthropology in a western Samoan village. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Duranti, Alessandro (2003). The voice of the audience in contemporary American political discourse. In J. E. Alatis & D. Tannen (eds.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Linguistics, language, and the real world – discourse and beyond, 114–36. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Erikson, Erik H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle: A reissue. New York: Norton.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. (1996). Senators on the campaign trail: The politics of representation. Norman & London: University of Oklahoma Press.
Garro, Linda C., & Mattingly, Cheryl (2000). Narrative as construct and construction. In Garro &Mattingly (eds.), Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing, 1–49. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1983). “From the native's point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In his Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology, 55–70. New York: Basic Books.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hanks, William F. (1987). Discourse genres in a theory of practice. American Ethnologist 14:668–92.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (2000). “Read my article”: Ideological complexity and the overdetermination of promising in American presidential politics. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities and identities, 259–91. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
Hill, Jane H., & Irvine, Judith T. (1993) (eds.). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hultkrantz, Åke, & Capps, Walter H. (1976). Seeing with a native eye: Essays on Native American religion. New York: Harper & Row.
Kant, Immanuel (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Leipzig: Hartknoch.
Kuipers, Joel C. (1990). Power in performance: The creation of textual authority in Weyewa ritual speech. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Keating, Elizabeth (1998). Power sharing: Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, George, & Turner, Mark (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linde, Charlotte (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mauss, Marcel (1938). La Notion de personne, celle de “moi”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 68:263–81. English translation in Mauss (1985).Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel (1985). A category of the human mind: The notion of person; the notion of self. In M. Carrithers et al. (eds.), The category of person: Anthropology, philosophy, history, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Medvedev, P. N., & Bakhtin, M. M. (1985). The formal method in literary scholarship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Morgan, Marcyliena (1991). Indirectness and interpretation in African American women's discourse. Pragmatics 1:421–51.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (2004). Narrative lessons. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 269–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology 25:19–43.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pernot, Laurent (2000). La Rhétorique dans l'antiquité. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
Polkinghorne, Donald (1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History 1:135–53.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society 25:167–203.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tannen, Deborah (1998). The argument culture: Stopping America's war of words. New York: Ballantine.
Taylor, Charles (1991). The dialogical self. In David Hiley et al. (eds.), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture, 304–14. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.
Weltman, David, & Billig, Michael (2001). The political psychology of contemporary anti-politics: A discursive approach to the end-of-ideology era. Political Psychology 22:367–82.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Wieneke, Bryant (2000). Winning without the spin: A true hero in American politics. Huntington, NY: Kroshka.
Wilson, John (2001). Political discourse. In D. Schiffrin et al. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 398–415. Malden, MA: Blackwell.