Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:24:14.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed grammar, purist grammar, and language attitudes in modern Nahuatl1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jane H. Hill  and
Kenneth C. Hill
Jane H. Hill
Affiliation:
Wayne State University & University of Michigan
Kenneth C. Hill
Affiliation:
Wayne State University & University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Tlaxcala and Puebla, Mexico, Nahuatl is being replaced by Spanish. Economic and social factors, principally a shift from a peripheral agrarian integration in the Mexican economy to integration as a rural proletariat involved in migratory labor, has been accompanied by a shift in language attitudes which has led to a narrowing of the range of functions of Nahuatl to a function primarily as a “language of solidarity.” This narrowing of function and the accompanying development of ethnic self-consciousness and egalitarianism are expressed through the stigmatization of Spanish loan words, other ethnic boundary-marking usages, the narrowing of honorific usage, and the differentiation of Nahuatl from Spanish grammar in noun-number constructions. (Nahuatl, Spanish, language shift, ethnicity.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 321 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albó, X. (1970). Sociol constraints on Cochabamba Quechua. Ph.D. dissertation, New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Beltrán G. (1973). Regiones de refugio. México: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baran, P. A. (1957) The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bateson., G. (1936). Naven: A survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1976). Dynamics of a creole system. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, J.-P. & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D., (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 409–34.Google Scholar
Brown., R. & Gilman., A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.). Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press of MIT. 253–76.Google Scholar
Dozier., E. P. (1956). Two examples of linguistic acculturation: The Yaqui of Sonora and Arizona and the Tewa of New Mexico. Language 32:146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Reprinted in Hymes, D. H. (ed.), Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper and Row. 51 1–16.)Google Scholar
Ferguson., C. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15:325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972). The sociology of language. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Press.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G. (1969). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G.. (1972). Lumpenbourgeoisie, lumpendevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Friedlander, J. (1975). Being Indian in Hueyapan: A study offorced identify in contemporary Mexico. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (1952). Tlaxcala in the sixteenth century. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, C.. (1964). The Aztecs under Spanish rule. Stanford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haudricourt, Andre G. (1961). Richesse en phonè;mes et richesse en locuteurs. L'Homme 1:5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1972). Telling tongues: Language policy in Mexico. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. & Hill, K. C. (1977). Language death and relexification in Tlaxcalan Nahuatl. Linguistics 191 (May 1977): 55–69. Also in Int. J. Sociol. Lung. 12:55–69.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. & Hill, K. C. (1978). Honorific usage in modern Nahuatl. Language 54 (1): 123–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. H. & Hill, K. C. (1979). Metaphorical switching in modern Nahuatl: Change and contradiction. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Psychology and Language,Bristol, England.July 16–20, 1979.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1961). Functions of speech: The evolutionary approach. In Gruber, F. C. (ed.), Anthropology and education. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knab, T. (1977). The long and short of Aztec dialects. In Whistler, K. et al. , (eds.), Proc. 3rd Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Lingusitics Society. 74–84.Google Scholar
Knab, T.. (1979). Language death in the valley of Puebla: A sociogeographic approach. ms.Google Scholar
Karttunen, F. (1978). The development of inanimate plural marking in postconquest Nahuatl. Texas Linguistic Form 10:21–30.Google Scholar
Karttunen, F. & Lockhart, J. (1976). Nahautl in the middle years: Language contact phenomena in texts of the colonial periód. U. Cal. Publications in Linguistics 85.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. (1954). Political systems ofhighland Burma. London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Nutini, H. (1968). San Bernardino Contla: Marriage and family structure in a Tlaxcalan municipio. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Nutini, H.. (1976). The demographic functions of compadrazgo in Santa Maria Beltn Azitzimitit-Ián and rural Tlaxcala. In Nutini, H. & White, D. (eds), Studies in Mesoamerican kinship. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 219–36.Google Scholar
Nutini, H.. (1977). Community variations and network structure in the social functions of compadrazgo in rural Tlaxcala, Mexico. Ethnology 14:353–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutini, H. & Isaac, B. (1974). Los pueblos de habla nbhuatl de la región de Tlaxcala y Puebla. México: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
Nutini, H. & Murphy, T. (1970) Labor migration and family structure in the Tlaxcala-Puebla area. In Goldschmidt, W. & Hoijer, H. (eds.). The social anrhropology of Latin America: Essays in honor of Ralph Leon Beals. Berkeley: U. Cal. P. 80–103.Google Scholar
Patrick, L. L. (1977). A cultural geography of the use of seasonally dry, sloping terrain: the metepantli crop terraces of Central Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Patrick, L. L. (1980). A proposed location of the southern boundary of the Province of Tlaxcala, Mexico. Geoscience and man 12.Google Scholar
Romero, Reséndiz A. (1974). Lo de Tlaxcala: Anárlisis impartial de los sucesos acaecidos en época de la Conquista. México: Costa-Amic, B., ed.Google Scholar
Sahagun, B. (16th c.) Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España. (Ed. and trs. by Dibble, C. E. & Anderson, A. J. O. as General history of the things of New Spain (Florentine codex; Monographs of the School of American Reseorch 14.) Santa Fe: The school of American Research; Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1953–1978).Google Scholar
Schieben-Lange, B. (1977). The language situation in Southern France. Linguistics 191 (05 1977): 101–8. Also in Inl. J. Sociol. Lang. 12:101–8.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. B. K. (1979). Linguistic convergence: An ethnography of speaking at Fort Chipewyan. Alberta. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (1978). The fiesta system and economic change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Van Zantwijk, R. (1965). La tendencia purista en el náhuatl del centro de México. Estudios de la Culturo Náhuatl 5: 129–42.Google Scholar