Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T19:49:07.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodology - James Pavone, “Implicational scales and English dialectology.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1980. Pp. xii + 294.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Thomas E. Murray
Thomas E. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of English, Ohio State UniversityColumbus, OH 43210–1370
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 412 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anshen, F. (1973). Some data which do not fit some models. In Bailey, C-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 62–68.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1970a). Using variation to confirm, rather than undermine, the validity of abstract Syntactic structures. Working papers in linguistics University of Hawaii, 2, No. 8, 77–86.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1970b). Building rate into a dynamic theory of linguistic description. Working papers in linguistics University of Hawaii, 2, No. 9, 161–233.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973a). The patteming of language variation. In Bailey, R. W. & Robinson, J. L. (eds.), Varieties of present-day English. New York: Macmillan. 156–86.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973b). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973a). Quantitative versus dynamic paradigms: The case of Montreal que. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 23–43.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973b). The nature of a creole continuum. Language 49:660–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50:333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R. R. (1972). Patterns of variation in copula and tense in the Hawaiian post-creole continuum. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1971a). Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press. 349–70.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1971b). Implicational scales and sociolinguistic linearity. Linguistics 73:30–43.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1973). What do implicational scales imply? In Bailey, C-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington. D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 141–48.Google Scholar
Elliott, D., Legum, S., & Thompson, S. (1969). Syntactic variation as linguistic data. In Binnick, R. et al. (eds.), Papers form the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 18–19. 1969. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago. 52–59.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. (1970). Two models of socially significant linguistic variation. Language 46:551–63.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18:52–72.Google Scholar
Keyscr, S. J. (1963). Review of Kurath, H. & McDavid, R. I. Jr, The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1961). Language 39:303–16.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Relatedness between grammatical systems. Language 40:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:75–62.Google Scholar
O'Neil, W. A. (1963). The dialects of modem Faroese: A preliminary report. Orbis 12:393–97.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1975). Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English bin. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds.), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 162–83.Google Scholar
Saltarelli, M. (1966). Romance dialectology and generative grammar. Orbis 15:51–59.Google Scholar
Saporta, S. (1965). Ordered rules, dialect differences, and ordered processes. Language 41:218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, W., & Bills, G. (1968). An investigation of the standard–nonstandard dimension of central Texan English. Austin: University of Texas Child Development Evaluation and Research Center.Google Scholar