Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:10:17.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Louise J. Ravelli and Robert A. Ellis (eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextual frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2008

Rodica Albu
Affiliation:
English, Al. I. Cuza University of Iaşi, Romania, [email protected]

Extract

Louise J. Ravelli and Robert A. Ellis (eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextual frameworks. London & New York: Continuum, 2004. (Pb 2005). Pp. xvi, 280. Hb £25.00.

Rather than focus on expert writing – as the title might suggest – the 14 contributors to this volume have chosen to center on issues related to students' written efforts to cope with the exigencies of the academic discourse community. The analyzed texts are viewed as “intimately related to their contexts” (p. 1). The latter are approached in ways based mainly on Systemic Functional Linguistics, along with “related social-constructivist frameworks and more generalised perspectives on ethnography” (1). The texts that provide empirical data were produced mainly by undergraduate students, but some are by high school and graduate students and, with the exception of one (German) set, were written by users of English (now the language of international academic exchange) as a first, second, or foreign language. The type of student, the type of academic writing (size, genre, level, discipline) and various other aspects of the social, cultural, and educational context are treated in their interrelatedness, which is theorized about, supported by empirical evidence, and, naturally, accompanied by pedagogical considerations in each study.

Type
BOOK NOTES
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)