Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:11:11.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The linguistic consequences of being a lame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

William Labov
William Labov
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most uniform and characteristic variety of Black English is the grammar used by members of the vernacular culture in pre-adolescent and adolescent years: the ‘Black English Vernacular’. Less regular varieties which show the influence of other dialects, are used by isolated individuals within the community (‘lames’) who are less familiar with vernacular norms. Rules that are categorical for the vernacular are often variable for lames. Within the vernacular peer groups, core members show the most regular or frequent use of characteristic rules such as the deletion of is. Since most linguists grow up relatively isolated individuals within their own communities, it is important that they become aware of the linguistic consequences of being lame, and apply this knowledge in their methodology.

Who's the lame who says he knows the game

And where did he learn to play?

– The Fall

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1973 , pp. 81 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. (1964). Deep down in the jungle. Hatboro, Pa.: Folklore Associates.Google Scholar
Anshen, F. (1969). Speech variation among Negroes in a small Southern community. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.) New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Baratz, J. C. (1969). Teaching reading in an urban Negro school system. In Baratz, J. C. and Shuy, R. (eds) Teaching Black children to read. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R. and Greenberger, E. (1969). Racial differences in the language of grade school children. Sociology of Education, 42 (3). Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C. & McFarlane, P. T. (1968). A preliminary study of standard English speech patterns in the Baltimore City public schools. (Report No. 16) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Glaser, D., Lander, B. & Abbott, W. (1971). Opiate addicted and non-addicted siblings in a slum area. Social Problems 18. 510–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds). The ethnography of communication. (AmA 66 (6), pt. 2) Washington, D.C: American Anthropological Association, 137–53.Google Scholar
Heber, R., Dever, R. & Conry, J. (1968). The influence of environmental and genetic variables on intellectual development. In Prehm, J. H., Hamerlynck, L. A. and Crosson, J. E. (eds). Behavioral research in mental retardation. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
Henrie, S. N. Jr. (1969). A study of verb phrases used by five-year-old non-standard Negro English speaking children. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.) Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic chievement? Harvard Educational Review. No. 39.Google Scholar
Kurath, H.Word geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, T. (1969). When is the Jets? Social Ambiguity in Peer Terminology. (Unpublished Master's Essay). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). The logic of non-standard English. In Alatis, J. (ed.), Linguistics and the teaching of standard English to speakers of other languages and dialects. (Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 22). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1–44.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23. 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48. 773–818.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. (Cooperative Research Report 3288. Vols. I and II.) New York: Columbia University. (Reprinted by U.S. Regional Survey, 3812 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19104.)Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Robins, C. (1969). A note on the relation of reading failure to peer-group status in urban ghettos. The Teachers College Record, 70. 395–405.Google Scholar
Legum, S., Pfaff, C., Tinnie, G. & Nicholas, M. (1971). The speech of young Black children in Los Angeles. (Southwest Regional Laboratory Technical Report 33). Inglewood, California.Google Scholar
Levine, L. & Crockett, H. J. Jr. (1966). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: postvocalic r. In Lieberson, S. (ed.) Explorations in sociolinguistics, Sociological inquiry 36 (4) (Reprinted as Publication 44, IJAL 1966.)Google Scholar
Loban, W. (1963). The language of elementary school children. (Research Monograph No. 1.) Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Loflin, M. (1970). On the structure of the verb in a dialect of American Negro English. Linguistics 59. 14–28.Google Scholar
Loman, B. (1967). Conversations in a Negro American dialect. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu of juvenile delinquency. Journal of Social Issues. 14. 5–19.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. I. (1969). Language behavior in a Black urban community. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.) Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Pavenstedt, E. (ed.). (1967). The drifters: children of disorganized lower-class families. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Raubicheck, L., Davis, E. & Adele Carll, L. (1940). Voice and speech problems. (Revised edition.) New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Shuy, R., Wolfram, W. & Riley, W. K. (1967). A study of social dialects in Detroit. (Final Report, Project 6–1347.) Washington, D.C., Office of Education.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. (1970). Toward a history of Negro dialect. In Williams, F. (ed.), Language and poverty; perspectives on a theme. Chicago, Markham.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. (1971). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. (Ph.D. dissertation) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street corner society; the social structure of an Italian slum. (Enlarged edition.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilmott, P. (1966). Adolescent boys of East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1936). A history of modern colloquial English. (Third edition.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar