We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bailey, R., & Görlach, M., (eds.) (1982). English as a world language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dada, A., (1983). Review of Pride, J., (ed), New Englishes. Language in Society, 12, (3): 410–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J., (1971). The sociology of language, an interdisciplinary approach, Rowley, Mass.:Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kachru, B., (1982). Models for non-native English. In Kachru, B. (ed), The other tongue. Urbana:University of Illinois Press. 31–57.Google Scholar
Kachru, B., (1981). The pragmatics of non-native varieties of English. In Smith, L. (ed), English for cross-cultural communication. New York: St. Martin's. 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, S., (1981). Towards a reformulation of interlanguage in the light of work on pidginization and ethnic minority English in Britain. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 6: 56–71.Google Scholar
Richards, J., & Tay, M., (1981). Norm and variability in language use and language learning. In Smith, L. (ed.), English for cross-cultural communication. New York: St. Martin's. 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H., (1975). The significance of simplification. Studies in Second Language Acquisition1:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar