Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:13:17.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Heteroglossia, performance, power, and participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

Alexandra Jaffe
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Michèle Koven
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Sabina Perrino
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Cécile B. Vigouroux
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University

Extract

In this special issue, we build on Bauman's seminal observation about performance, that ‘the act of expression is put on display, objectified, marked out to a degree from its discursive surrounding and opened up to interpretive scrutiny and evaluation by an audience’ (2000:1). More recently, scholars have moved to examining the performative role of heteroglossia, that is, the use of multiply sourced, semiotic (verbal and nonverbal) forms. In particular, this line of research has shown how attention to heteroglossic performances and their local interpretations can illuminate the subtle politics of dominant and nondominant identities in different ethnographic contexts. This is particularly true of what Coupland (2007) calls ‘high performances’, which, as Bell & Gibson (2011:558) write, are privileged sites for allowing participants to indexically associate expressive forms with social personae. Thus, while all performances are inherently reflexive, heteroglossic performances particularly amplify that reflexivity with respect to their multiple frames, voices, and stances that they presuppose and establish.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, Louis (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Althusser, Louis (ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays, 170–86. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2012). Repertoires, characters and scenes: Sociolinguistic difference in Turkish-German comedy. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 13(2):301–26.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard (2000). Language, identity, performance. Pragmatics 10:15.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard (2011). Commentary: Foundations in performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:707–20.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan, & Gibson, Andy (2011). Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(5):555–72.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chun, Elaine (2004). Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho's revoicings of mock Asian. Pragmatics 14(2/3):263–89.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2009). Dialect style, social class and metacultural performance: The pantomime dame. In Coupland, Nikolas & Jaworski, Adam (eds.), The new sociolinguistics reader, 311–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frekko, Susan E. (2011). Containing Castilian in Catalan talk radio: Heteroglossia and the projection of monoglot identities. Anthropological Quarterly 84(1):6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, & Woolard, Kathryn (2000). Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: Saint Jerome's.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2005). Intertextual sexuality. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:125–44.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (2000). Comic performance and the articulation of hybrid identity. Pragmatics 10(1):3959.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (2009). Indeterminacy and regularization: A process-based approach to the study of sociolinguistic variation and language ideologies. Sociolinguistic Studies 3(2):229–51.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam (2014). Metrolingual art: Multilingualism and heteroglossia. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(2):134–58.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Mairead, & Pietikäinen, Sari (2011). Micro-level language-planning and grass-root initiatives: A case study of Irish language comedy and Inari Sámi rap. Current Issues in Language Planning 12(3):363–79.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alistair (2003). Global Englishes, Rip Slyme, and performativity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4):513–33.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari, & Dlaske, Kati (2013). Cutting across media spaces and boundaries: The case of a hybrid, indigenous Sámi TV comedy. Sociolinguistica 27:87100.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin (2012). The days of our lives: Language, gender and affluence on a daytime television drama. Gender and Language 6(1):153–80.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1996). Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Brenneis, Donald & Macauley, Ron K. S. (eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology, 284306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn (1999). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(1):329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar