Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:42:50.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“High” and “low” in urban Danish speech styles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2013

Lian Malai Madsen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Department of Scandinavian Studies and Linguistics, Njalsgade 120, 2300 Kbh. S., [email protected]

Abstract

This article approaches on-going sociolinguistic processes in Copenhagen by focusing on the overt metalinguistic activities of a group of adolescents. The article sheds light on how social power differences are refracted in the metalinsguistic activities of these adolescents in spite of the relatively homogenous (or hegemonic) sociolinguistic conditions of Danish society. In the article, I investigate how social status relations understood as cultural interpretations of societal “high” and “low” are relevant to on-going social value ascriptions to the contrasting ways of speaking labelled “integrated” and “street language.” The metalinguistic data I present points to a sociolinguistic transformation. Linguistic signs that used to be seen as related to migration, on an insider/outsider dimension of comparison, are now related to status on a high/low dimension as well. (Sociolinguistic transformation, ethnicity, social class, enregisterment, metalinguistic reflections)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ag, Astrid (2010). Sprogbrug og identitetsarbejde hos senmoderne storbypiger. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23:231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aarsæther, Finn (2010). The use of multiethnic youth language in Oslo. In Quist & Svendsen, 111–26.Google Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian, & Creese, Angela (2010). Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, & Rampton, Ben (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13:122.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, & Verschueren, Jef (1998). Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, Harriet (1996). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Brink, Lars, & Lund, Jørn (1975). Dansk Rigsmål. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Brochmann, Grete, & Hagelund, Anniken (2010). Velferdens grenser. Copenhagen: Scanvik.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2004). Styles and stereotypes: The linguistic negotiation of identity among Laotian American youth. Pragmatics 14:127–47.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2011). White kids: Language, race and styles of youth identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Elaine (2011). Reading race beyond black and white. Discourse & Society 22:403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extra, Guus; Spotti, Max; & van Avermaet, Piet (eds.) (2009). Language testing, migration and citizenship: Cross-national perspectives on integration regimes. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fanshawe, Simon, & Sriskandarajah, Danny (2010). You can't put me in a box: Super-diversity and the end of identity politics in Britain. Online at the Institute for Public Policy Research, http://www.ippr.org.uk/publication/55/1749/you-cant-put-me-in-a-box-super-diversity-and-the-end-of-identity-politics-in-britain.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen (2008). Problematizing ethnolects: Naming linguistic prcatices in an Antwerp secondary school. International Journal of Bilingualism 12:85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen (2011). Strange bedfellows: Appropriations of a tainted urban dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:493524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, Rickard (2007). Blatte betyder kompis: Om maskulinitet och språk i en högstadieskola. Stockholm: Ordfront.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara; Andrus, Jennifer; & Danielsen, Andrew E. (2006). Mobility, indexicality and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 34:77104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Jens Normann, & Kristensen, Kjeld (1994). Moderne sjællandsk: En undersøgelse af unge sjællænderes talesprog. København: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Martha Karrebæk, Madsen, Lian Malai; & Møller, Janus Spindler (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities 13:2338.Google Scholar
Keim, Inken (2007). Die “türkischen Powergirls.” Lebenswelt und kommunikativer Stil einer Migrantinnengruppe in Mannheim. Türbinger: Narr.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike, & Selting, Margret (eds.) (2012). Ethnic styles of speaking in European metropolitan areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kießling, Roland, & Mous, Maarten (2004). Urban youth languages in Africa. Anthropological Linguistics 46:303–41.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Kjeld (2003). Standard Danish, Copenhagen sociolects, and regional varieties in the 1900s. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:2944.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore (2001). Two standards: One for the media and one for the school. Language Awareness 10(1):924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore (2009). The macro-level social meanings of late modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore, & Jørgensen, Jens Normann (2003). The sociolinguistics of Danish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2008). Fighters and outsiders: Linguistic practices, social identities and social relationships among youth in a martial arts club. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2011). Interactional renegotiations of educational discourses in recreational learning contexts. Linguistics and Education 22:5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2012). Late modern youth style in interaction. In Kern & Selting, 265–90.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2013). Heteroglossia, voicing and social categorisation. In Blackledge, Adrian & Creese, Angela (eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy, to appear.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai; Møller, Janus Spindler, & Jørgensen, J. Normann (2010). “Street language” and “integrated”: Language use and enregisterment among late modern urban girls. In Madsen, Lian Malai, Møller, Janus Spindler, & Jørgensen, Jens Normann (eds), Ideological constructions and enregisterment of linguistic youth styles, 81113. (Copenhagen studies in bilingualism 55.) Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie (2005). Language attitudes, norm and gender: A presentation of the method and results from a language attitude study. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37:5580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maegaard, Marie (2007). Udtalevariation og – forandring i københavnsk – en etnografisk undersøgelse af sprogbrug, sociale kategorier og social praksis blandt unge på en københavnsk folkeskole. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2008). Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Janus Spindler (2009). Poly-lingual interaction across childhood, youth and adulthood. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Newell, Sasha (2009). Enregistering modernity, bluffing criminality: How Nouchi speech reinvented (and fractured) the nation. Journal of Linaguiatic Anthropology 19:157–84.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry (1998). Identities: The hidden life of class. Journal of Anthropological Research 45:117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Marianne H. (2007). Umm Zainaps Rejse. In Olwig, Karen Fog & Pærregaard, Karsten (eds.), Integration: Antropologiske perspektiver, 141210. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, & Hansen, Gert Foget (2006). Prosodic aspects of the Copenhagen multiethnolect. Nordic prosody: Proceedings of the IXth Conference, Lund 2004, 8796. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia (2008). Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12:4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia, & Svendsen, Bente A. (eds.) (2010). Multilingual urban Scandinavia. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben (2011). Style contrast, migration and social class. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1236–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, Bettina Wolfgang (2009). Kampen om integrationen. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1985). On the pragmatic “poetry” of prose. In Schiffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context, 181–99. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Stæhr, Andreas (2010). Rappen reddede os: Et studie af senmoderne storbydrenges identitetsarbejde i fritids- og skolemiljøer. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind; Kerswill, Paul; & Fox, Sue (2006). Ethnicity as a source of changes in the London vowel system. In Hinskens, Frans (ed.), Language variation: European perspectives. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE3), Amsterdam, June 2005, 249–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar