Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:53:45.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The good English’: The ideological construction of the target language in adult ESOL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2021

Kelsey Swift Open the ORCID record for Kelsey Swift [Opens in a new window]
Kelsey Swift*
Affiliation:
The Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Kelsey Swift The Graduate Center City University of New York 365 5th Ave New York, NY10016, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This project problematizes hegemonic conceptions of language by looking at the construction of ‘English’ in a nonprofit, community-based adult ESOL program in New York. I use ethnographic observation and interviews to uncover the discursive and pedagogical practices that uphold these hegemonic conceptions in this context. I find that the structural conditions of the program perpetuate a conception of ‘English’ shaped by linguistic racism and classism, despite the program's progressive ideals. Linguistic authority is centralized through the presentation of a closed linguistic system and a focus on replication of templatic language. This allows for the drawing of linguistic borders by pathologizing forms traditionally associated with racialized varieties of English, pointing to the persistence of raciolinguistic ideologies. Nevertheless, students destabilize these dominant ideas, revealing a disconnect between mainstream understandings of language and the way adult immigrant learners actually use language, and pointing to possibilities for alternate conceptions and pedagogies. (Language ideology, raciolinguistics, Standard English, adult ESOL)

Type
Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 309 - 331
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, Carolyn Temple, & Wright, Laura J. (2015). Discourse in educational settings. In Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 1, 2nd edn., 858–78. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). The object called ‘language’ and the subject of linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics 35(3):217–35.10.1177/0075424207304240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, Samy, & Smitherman, Geneva (2012). Articulate while Black. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Bell, April (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John (2003). Linguistic profiling. In Makoni, Sinfree, Smitherman, Geneva, Ball, Arnetha F., & Spears, Arthur K. (eds.), Black linguistics: Language, society, and politics in Africa and the Americas, 155–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh, & Liyanage, Indika (2012). Lessons from pre-colonial multilingualism. In Martin-Jones, Marilyn, Blackledge, Adrian, & Creese, Angela (eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism, 49–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian R., & Shankar, Shalini (eds.) (2017). Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian (2016). Premises of multi-competence. In Cook, Vivian & Wei, Li (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Melanie; Bryers, Dermot; & Winstanley, Becky (2018). ‘Our languages’: Sociolinguistics in multilingual participatory ESOL classes. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, Paper 234.Google Scholar
Creese, Angela; Adrian Blackledge, Jaspreet Kaur Takhi, (2014). The ideal ‘native speaker’ teacher: Negotiating authenticity and legitimacy in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal 98(4):937–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Nelson, & Rosa, Jonathan (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Education Review 85(2):149–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen (2003). Chicano English in context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, Lachman (2012). Language plurality of South Asia: A search for alternate models in knowledge construction. Applied Linguistics Review 3(2):315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrotta, Clarena (2017). Immigrants to the United States and adult education services. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2017(155):61–69.10.1002/ace.20241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Marguerite (2009). We thought they had forgotten us: Research, policy, and practice in the education of Latino immigrant adults. Journal of Latinos and Education 8(2):161–72.10.1080/15348430902750775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttrell, Wendy (2010). Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macedo, Donaldo (ed.) (2019). Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, Sinfree, & Pennycook, Alastair (2006). Disinventing and (re)constituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 22(3):137–56.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1991). Voices of America: Accent, antidiscrimination law, and a jurisprudence for the last reconstruction. Yale Law Journal 100:1329–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie, & Heller, Monica (2017). Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James, & Milroy, Lesley (1998). Authority in language: Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo; García, Ofelia; & Reid, Wallis (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 6(3):281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta (2002). We have room for but one language here: Language and national identity in the US at the turn of the 20th century. Multilingua 21(2–3):163–96.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair (2019). From translanguaging to translingual activism. In Donaldo Macedo (ed.), Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteaching of English and other colonial languages, 169–85. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429453113-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Robert (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Angela (2011). ‘Racist!’: Metapragmatic regimentation of racist discourse by Asian American youth. Discourse & Society 22(4):458–73.10.1177/0957926510395836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Angela, & Wortham, Walt (2016). Discourse analysis across events. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rickford, John, & King, Sharese (2016). Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language 92(4):948–88.10.1353/lan.2016.0078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan (2019). Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan, & Flores, Nelson (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5):621–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John, & Coulthard, Malcolm (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tupas, Ruanni (2020). Fostering translingual dispositions against unequal Englishes. English in Education, 1–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2020.1786367.Google Scholar
Valdés, Guadalupe (2015). Latin@s and the intergenerational continuity of Spanish: The challenges of curricularizing language. International Multilingual Research Journal 9:253–73.10.1080/19313152.2015.1086625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, Guadalupe (2017). Entry visa denied: The construction of symbolic language borders in educational settings. In García, Ofelia, Flores, Nelson, & Spotti, Massimiliano (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society, 321–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, Terrence, & Lukes, Marguerite (1996). English-only and standard English ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly 30(3):511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar