Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:40:08.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Georgina Heydon, The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2007

Ana Cristina Ostermann
Affiliation:
Applied Linguistics, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo, RS 93022-000, Brazil, [email protected]

Extract

Georgina Heydon, The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. xii + 229. Hb $69.95.

This book presents a critical analysis of police interviewing in Australia. The author investigates the role of the police in the police–suspect interview in relation to both the negotiation of power relations between participants and the fulfillment of institutional requirements. Combining the analytical tools provided by interactional sociolinguistics and Conversation Analysis (CA), Heydon investigates recordings of police questioning of adult suspects. These findings are compared to findings of a previous study (Heydon 1997), in which Heydon investigated recordings of the training of police for interviewing children. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is used to interpret the results of the descriptive analysis.

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Longman.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heydon, Georgina (1997). Participation frameworks, discourse features and embedded requests in police V.A.T.E. interviews with children. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.
Heritage, John, & Watson, Rodney (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 12362. New York: Irvington.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A.; Sacks, Harvey; & Jefferson, Gail (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:36182.Google Scholar