Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:24:42.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functions of in-house language: Observations on data collected from some British financial institutions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

M. Ean Taylor
M. Ean Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, Doncaster Metropolitan Institute of Higher Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nonuse of available slang terms for cash among British bank and building society cashiers is noted and an explanation sought in the field of social control. The possible relevance of the Whorfian hypothesis is explored, and it is suggested that the in-house terms discussed have social and psychological functions in addition to the representational. (Financial terminology, social control, language functions, Whorfian hypothesis).

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1972). Cognition in ethnolinguistics. In Adams, P. (ed.). Language in thinking. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 157–69.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1970). A dictionary of slang and unconventional English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1972). Philosophical investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M.. trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott.Google Scholar