Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:57:35.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Female–male differences in conversational interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Lynette Hirschman
Lynette Hirschman
Affiliation:
MITRE Corporation, MS K 329, 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article describes a preliminary experiment looking at possible differences in how females and males interact in conversation. The article analyzes data from an experiment where two females and two males talked to each other in all possible pairs; a total of 60 minutes of conversation (six dyads) was transcribed. The goal was to isolate quantifiable entities related to controlling or directing the conversation. We looked at issues such as who talked how much, how fluently or confidently – and how the two people in the conversation interacted in terms of interruptions and indications of support, agreement, or disagreement. The findings from such a small sample are only relevant to suggest hypotheses for further research. However, we noticed a number of interesting differences: the female speakers used more 1st person pronouns and fewer 3rd person references than the male speakers; the female speakers used mm hmm at a much higher frequency than the male speakers; the female speakers also interrupted each other more; and the female/female conversation seemed more fluent than the other conversations, as measured by number of disfluencies and number of affirmative transitions upon speaker change. All of these differences suggest that this area is a fruitful one for further investigation. (Conversational analysis, gender differences)

Type
Notes from the Sociolinguistic Underground
Information
Language in Society , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 427 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

James, Deborah, & Clarke, Sandra (1993). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Gender and conversational interaction, 231–80. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie (1975). Male/female language. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2: 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1976), ed. Notes from the linguistic underground. New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uhuh” and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (GURT '81), 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie, & Henley, Nancy (1975), eds. Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie; Kramarae, Cheris; & Henley, Nancy (1983), eds. Language, gender, and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar