Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:02:49.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donald E. Allen and Rebecca F. Guy. Conversational Analysis: The Sociology of Talk. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. Pp. 284.

Review products

Donald E. Allen and Rebecca F. Guy. Conversational Analysis: The Sociology of Talk. The Hague: Mouton, 1974. Pp. 284.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jim Schenkein
Jim Schenkein
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York 11367
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 387 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Reading: Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil (1964). Social class speech systems psychotherapy, British Journal of Sociology 03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1952). Introduction to kinesics: An annotation system for the body motion and gesture. Washington, D.C.: Department of State Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters, two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indiana: BobbsMerrillGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.. (1963). Behavior in public places, notes on the social organization of gatherings, New York: Macmillan, Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation (speech behavior in social situations). American Anthropologist 66. 133–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lennard, H. L. & Bernstein, A. (1969). Patterns of Human Interaction. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Matarazzo, J. D., Wiens, A. A. & Saslow, G. (1965). Studies in interview speech behavior: New developments and their clinical applications in Krasner, and Ulman, (eds.) New York.Google Scholar
Psathas, G. (1969). Analyzing dyadic interaction. In Gerbner, G., Holsti, Ole R., Krippendorff, K., Paisley, W. J. & Stone, P. (eds.), The Analysis of Communication Content. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1969). A system-theoretic view of content analysis. In Gerbner, G., Hoisti, Ole R., Krippendorff, K., Paisley, W. J. & Stone, P. J. (eds.), The analysis of communicative content. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ruesch, J., (1957) Disturbed communication. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruesch, J., (1961). Therapeutic communication. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stone, P., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S. & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). The general inquirer. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar