We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A. D. Švejcer, Contemporary sociolinguistics: Theory, problems, methods. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986. Pp. 193. - A. D. Švejcer and L. B. Nikol'skij, Introduction to sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986. Pp. xii + 179.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
18 December 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bickerton, D. (1973). The chimera of context. Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
D'Agostino, F. (1985). Ontology and explanation in historical linguistics. Philosophy of Social Sciences15: 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, F. (1986). Chomsky's Systems of ideas. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1973). Methodological individualism and methodological socialism. In O'Neill (1973).Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. (ed.). (1973). Trends in Soviet theoretical linguistics. Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreindler, I. (1982). The changing status of Russian in the Soviet Union. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 33: 7–39.Google Scholar
Labov, W. ([1966] 1982). The social stratification of English in New York City, 3rd ed.Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (ed.). (1980). Locating language in tinte and space. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1982). On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P., & Malkiel, Y. (eds.). (1968). Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lenček, R. (1971). Problems in sociolinguistics in the Soviet Union. In O'Brien (1971). 269–301.Google Scholar
Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J.Jr., (1969). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: The post-vocalic r. In Lieberson (1969). 76–96.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. (ed.). (1969). Explorations in sociolinguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Luelsdorff, P. A. (ed.). (1975). Soviet contributions to the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1976). From Romance philology through dialect geography to sociolinguistics. Linguistics. 177: 59–85.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. R. (ed.). (1971). 22nd Annual Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Development of the sixties - Viewpoints for the seventies. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, J. (ed.). (1973). Modes of individualism and collectivism. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Prucha, J. (ed.). (1976). Soviet studies in language and language behaviour. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Prucha, J. (ed.). (1983). Pragmalinguistics: East European approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982a). Socio-historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982b). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Švejcer, A. D. (1978). Standard English in the United States and England. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. ([1973] 1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language, 2nd ed.London: Academic.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann & Malkiel (1968). 95–189.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (ed.). (1977). Recent trends in Soviet psycholinguistics. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar