Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Johnson, Donna M.
1992.
Interpersonal involvement in discourse: Gender variation in L2 writers' complimenting strategies.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 3,
p.
195.
Johnson, Donna M.
1994.
Who is We?: Constructing Communities in US-Mexico Border Discourse.
Discourse & Society,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 2,
p.
207.
Freed, Alice F.
1995.
Language and Gender.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. ,
p.
3.
Haswell, Richard H.
and
Haswell, Janis Tedesco
1996.
Gender bias and critique of student writing.
Assessing Writing,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Belcher, Diane D.
1997.
An argument for nonadversarial argumentation: on the relevance of the feminist critique of academic discourse to L2 writing pedagogy.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Winn, Laura L.
and
Rubin, Donald L.
2001.
Enacting Gender Identity in Written Discourse.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
393.
Watts, Richard J.
2003.
Politeness.
Hobbs, Pamela
2003.
The medium is the message: politeness strategies in men's and women's voice mail messages.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Salager‐Meyer, Françoise
and
Ariza, María Ángeles Alcaraz
2003.
Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse: a cross‐generic approach.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
96.
Kubota, Ryuko
2003.
New approaches to gender, class, and race in second language writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Doohan, Eve‐Anne M.
and
Manusov, Valerie
2004.
The communication of compliments in romantic relationships: An investigation of relational satisfaction and sex differences and similarities in compliment behavior.
Western Journal of Communication,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 2,
p.
170.
Sellnow, Deanna D.
and
Treinen, Kristen P.
2004.
The role of gender in perceived speaker competence: an analysis of student peer critiques.
Communication Education,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 3,
p.
286.
HOLMES, JANET
and
MARRA, MEREDITH
2004.
Relational practice in the workplace: Women's talk or gendered discourse?.
Language in Society,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 03,
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004.
Introducing polylogue.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
2006.
Gendered Talk at Work.
p.
224.
Mackiewicz, Jo
2007.
Compliments and Criticisms in Book Reviews About Business Communication.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
188.
Tse, Polly
and
Hyland, Ken
2008.
‘Robot Kung fu’: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 7,
p.
1232.
Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt
and
Tewksbury, Richard
2008.
Reviewers' Views on Reviewing: An Examination of the Peer Review Process in Criminal Justice.
Journal of Criminal Justice Education,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
351.
Styslinger, Mary E.
2008.
Gendered Performances During Peer Revision∗.
Literacy Research and Instruction,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
211.
Roberts, Felicia
and
Cimasko, Tony
2008.
Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors’ responses to second language writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
125.