No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Charles L. Briggs, Competence in performance: The creativity of tradition in Mexicano verbal art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988. Pp. xix + 427.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
REFERENCES
Bauman, Richard. (1987). The decentering of discourse. Paper delivered at the 86th Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association,Chicago.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L. (1979). Text-building, epistemology, and aesthetics in Javanese shadow theatre. In Becker, A. L. & Yengoyan, Aram (eds.), The imagination of reality: Essays in South-east Asian coherence Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 211–43.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. (1986). On ethnographic allegory. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. (eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossen, Gary. ([1974] 1984). Chamulas in the world of the sun. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. (1984). The semiology of textualization. Language Sciences 6(2):271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Joel. (1989). “Medical discourse” in anthropological context: Views of language and power. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 3(2):99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCanles, Michael. (1982). Machiavelli's principe and the textualization of history. Modern Language Notes 97:(1):1–18.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Keview 47:257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter. (1984). Orality, literacy, and medieval textualization. New Literary History 16(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Stephen. (1986). Post-modern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. (eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press. 122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar