Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:04:41.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ancient Greek address system and some proposed sociolinguistic universals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Eleanor Dickey
Eleanor Dickey
Affiliation:
Classical Studies, University of Ottawa, PO Box 450, Stn. A Ottawa, Ontario KIN 6N5, Canada, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article summarizes the results of a longer study of address forms in Ancient Greek, based on 11,891 address tokens from a variety of sources. It argues that the Greek evidence appears to contradict two tendencies, found in address forms in other languages, which have been claimed as possible sociolinguistic universals: the tendency toward T/V distinctions, and the principle that “What is new is polite.” It is suggested that these alleged universals should perhaps be re-examined in light of the Greek evidence, and that ancient languages in general have more to contribute to sociolinguistics than is sometimes realized. (Address, Ancient Greek, T/V distinctions)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biber, Douglas (1988) Variation across speech and writing Cambridge & New YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Fnedenke (1988) Terms of address Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures BerlinMouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike, Kohz, Armin, & Schubert, Klaus (1986) Anredeforschung Kommentierte Bibliographie zur Soziolmguistik der Anrede (Ars linguistica Commentationes analyticae et criticae, 16) TubingenNarrGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Ford, Marguerite (1961) Address in American English Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 375–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Gilman, Albert (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity In Sebeok, Thomas A (ed ), Style in language, 253–76 New YorkWileyGoogle Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor (1996) Greek forms of address From Herodotus to Lucian Oxford & New YorkOxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinneen, Lucilla (1929) Titles of address in Christian Greek epistolography to 527 AD ChicagoAresGoogle Scholar
Friednch, Paul (1966) Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage In Bright, William (ed ), Socioltngutstics (Janua hnguarum, series maior, 20), 214–59 The Hague MoutonGoogle Scholar
Head, Brian F (1978) Respect degrees in pronominal reference In Greenberg, Joseph H (ed ), Universals of human language, 3 151–211Stanford, CAStanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Juck-Ryoon (1975) Role of sociolinguistics in foreign language education, with reference to Korean and English terms of address and levels of deference Dissertation, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
Kielkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka (1992) A socio-historical study in address Polish and English (Bamberger Beit rage zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft, 30 ) ParisLangGoogle Scholar
Kroger, Rolf O, & Wood, Linda A (1992) Are the rules of address universal? IV Comparison of Chinese, Korean, Greek, and German usage Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23 148–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1972) Some principles of linguistic methodology Language in Society 1 97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, Dilworth B (1985) Constructing the social context of communication Terms of address in Egyptian Arabic (Contributions to the sociology of language, 41 ) BerlinMouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipsen, Gerry, & Huspek, Michael (1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address Anthropological Linguistics 27 94–101Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1982) Socio-historical linguistics Its status and methodology Cambridge & New YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I, Miller, Stephen H, & Porter, Lyman W (1968) Forms of address and social relations in a business organization Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 289–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa (1976) Speech events and natural speech Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology Language in Society 5 189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilhacus, Henrik (1943) Zur Sprache griechischer Familienbnefe des III Jahrhunderts N Chr HelsinkiSocietas Scientiarum FennicaGoogle Scholar
Zilhacus, Henrik (1949) Untersuchungen zu den abstrakten Anredeformen und Hoflichkeitstiteln im Griechischen HelsinkiSocietas Scientiarum FennicaGoogle Scholar