We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Mol, Annemarie (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. The Sociological Review47(1):74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko (2016). A cost-and-benefit approach to language loss. In Filipović, Luna & Pütz, Martin (eds.), Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, 115–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism14(3):269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair, & Otsuji, Emi (2017). Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo. Social Semiotics27(4):434–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2004). Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America2(1):3–22.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel (2021). Posthumanist world Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Julian S., & Núñez, Justina Núñez (2021). Articulating worlds otherwise: Decolonial geolinguistic praxis, multi-epistemic co-existence, and intercultural education and development programing in the Peruvian Andes. Cultural Geographies28(4):577–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar