Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:51:27.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Affect in sociolinguistic style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2021

Teresa Pratt Open the ORCID record for Teresa Pratt [Opens in a new window]
Teresa Pratt*
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Teresa Pratt San Francisco State University Humanities Building 1600 Holloway Ave San Francisco, CA 94132, USA [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues for a focus on affect in sociolinguistic style. I integrate recent scholarship on affective practice (Wetherell 2015) and the circulation of affective value (Ahmed 2004b) in order to situate the linguistic and bodily semiotics of affect as components of stylistic practice. At a Bay Area public arts high school, ideologically distinct affects of chill or high-energy are co-constructed across signs and subjects. I analyze a group of cisgender young men's use of creaky voice quality, speech rate, and bodily hexis in enacting and circulating these affective values. Crucially, affect co-constructs students’ positioning within the high school political economy (as college-bound or not, artistically driven or not), highlighting the ideological motivations of stylistic practice. Building on recent scholarship, I propose that a more thorough consideration of affect can deepen our understanding of meaning-making as it occurs in everyday interaction in institutional settings. (Affect, political economy, embodiment, bricolage, voice quality, speech rate, high school)

Type
Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 1 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sarah (2004a). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sarah (2004b). Affective economies. Social Text 79:117–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sarah (2010). Happy objects. In Gregg, Melissa & Siegworth, Gregory J. (eds.), The affect theory reader, 29–51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas; Maechler, Martin; Bolker, Ben; & Walker, Steven (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. R package. Version 1.1–7. Online: http://CRaN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.49. Online: http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16:645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1978). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics 4.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (1999). ‘Why be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28:203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2010). White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 173–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy (2019a). The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 48:31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy (2019b). From sissy to sickening: The indexical landscape of /s/ in SoMa, San Francisco. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 29:332–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Elaine, & Podesva, Robert J. (2010). Voice quality and indeterminacies of social meaning in constructed dialogue. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 18, Southampton.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia, & Smiljanic, Rajka (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics 39:237–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clough, Patricia Ticineto, with Halley, Jean (eds.) (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa (2020). Contributions of modal and creaky voice to the perception of habitual pitch. Language 96:22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dael, Nele; Mortillaro, Marcello; & Scherer, Klaus R. (2012). The body action and posture coding system (BAP): Development and reliability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 36:97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, Michel (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette (2018). Personae and phonetic detail in sociolinguistic signs. Language in Society 47:513–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette; Hilton, Katherine; & Pratt, Teresa (2013). Creaky voice across discourse contexts: Investigating the locus of style for creak. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 42, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2010). Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15:70–80.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2019). The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority. Language 95:751–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELAN (2019). ELAN, version 5.8 [computer software]. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Online: https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/.Google Scholar
Ferrada, Juan Sebastián; Bucholtz;, Mary & Corella, Meghan (2019). ‘Respeta mi idioma’: Latinx youth enacting affective agency. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 19(2):79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1978). Response cries. Language 54:787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In Meyer, Christian, Streeck, Jürgen, & Scott Jordan, J. (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction, 73–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira; Goldstein, Donna M.; & Ingram, Matthew Bruce (2016). The hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, gesture, spectacle. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6:71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebdige, Dick (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline, & Bladon, Anthony (1988). Creak as a sociophonetic marker. In Hyman, Larry & Li, Charles N. (eds.), Language, speech, and mind, 3–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1989). When talk isn't cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16:248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1990). Registering affect: Heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Lutz, Catherine A. & Abu-Lughod, Lila (eds.), Language and the politics of emotion, 126–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith, & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa; Fox, Robert A.; O'Neill, Caitlin; & Salmons, Joseph (2009). Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change 21:233–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, Patricia; Garellek, Marc; & Kreiman, Jody (2015). Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281119746_Acoustic_properties_of_different_kinds_of_creaky_voice.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler (2009). Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Durham, NC: Duke University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. (2018). Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA 13:191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, & Maddieson, Ian (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leap, William (2018) (ed). Language/sexuality/affect: Introduction to the special issue of the Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez (2016). Conflicted selves: Language, religion and same-sex desire in Israel. In Levon, Erez & Mendes, Ronald Beline (eds.), Language, sexuality, and power: Studies in intersectional sociolinguistics, 215–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Marc D., & Liu, Zhong-xu (2011). Three time scales of neural self-organization underlying basic and nonbasic emotions. Emotion Review 3:416–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massumi, Brian (1987). Translator's foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In Deleuze, Gilles & Guattari, Felix, A thousand plateaus: Capitalism & schizophrenia. Trans. by Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movements, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Susan (2013). Radical political agency: Affective politics in the case of the Zapatistas of Chiapas. In Maiguashca, Bice & Marchetti, Raffaele (eds.), Contemporary political agency: Theory and practice, 137–62. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (1995). Pregnant pauses: Silence and authority in the Anita Hill- Clarence Thomas hearings. In Hall, Kira & Bucholtz, Mary (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self, 51–66. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2011). The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21:261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964). Sense and non-sense. Trans. by Dreyfus, Hubert & Dreyfus, Patricia Allen. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. (2015). Sexual cityzenship: Discourses, bodies and spaces at Joburg Pride 2012. Journal of Language and Politics 14:431–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M.; Levon;, Erez & Glocer, Ruth (2019). Crossing boundaries: Visceral landscapes of Israeli nationalism. Sociolinguistic Studies 13:37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M., & Richardson, John (2020). Discourse and affect. Social Semiotics. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1810553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Emma, & Podesva, Robert J. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38:447–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi (1989). Language has a heart. Text 9:7–25.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(1):139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Teresa (2020). Embodying ‘tech’: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24:328–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Teresa, & D'Onofrio, Annette (2017). Jaw setting and the California Vowel Shift in parodic performance. Language in Society 46:283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Online: www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Reyes, Angela (2017). Ontology of fake: Discerning the Philippine elite. Signs and Society 5:S100–S127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, Michael P.; Maclagan;, Margaret A. & Chen, Yang (2004). Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 18:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfelder, Ingrid; Fruehwald, Joe; Evanini, Keelan; & Yuan, Jiahong (2011). FaVE (Forced alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite. Online: http://fave.ling.upenn.edu.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky (2003). Touching feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Francesca, & Crocker, Victoria (2015). Creaky voice as a stylistic feature of young American female speech: An intraspeaker variation study of Scarlett Johansson. Lifespans & Styles: Undergraduate Working Papers on Intraspeaker Variation 1:21–27.Google Scholar
Slobe, Tyanna (2018). Style, stance, and social meaning in mock white girl. Language in Society 47:541–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalls, Krystal (2020). Race, SIGNS, and the body: Towards a theory of racial semiotics. In Alim, H. Samy, Reyes, Angela, & Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1985). Ethics. Reprinted in Curley, Edwin (ed.), Complete works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, Rebecca L.; Wang;, Tianxiao & Go, Christian (2020). Sexuality vs. sensuality: The multimodal construction of affective stance in Chinese ASMR performances. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24:492–513.Google Scholar
Thrift, Nigel (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler 86:57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, Nigel (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics and affect. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan (1962). Affect, imagery, and consciousness: The positive affects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society 21:139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2015). Creak as disengagement: Gender, affect, and the iconization of voice quality. Paper presented at NWAV 44, University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar