Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T03:20:13.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A semantic metalanguage for a crosscultural comparison of speech acts and speech genres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Anna Wierzbicka
Anna Wierzbicka
Affiliation:
Department of LinguisticsAustralian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses a number of speech acts and speech genres from English, Polish, and Japanese, approaching them through the words which name them. It is claimed that folk names of speech acts and speech genres are culture-specific and provide an important source of insight into communicative routines most characteristic of a given society; and that to fully exploit this source one must carry Out a rigorous semantic analysis of such names and express the results of this analysis in a culture-independent semantic metalanguage. The author proposes such a metalanguage and illustrates her approach with numerous detailed semantic analyses. She suggests that analyses of speech acts and speech genres carried out in terms of English folk labels are ethnocentric and unsuitable for crosscultural comparison. She tries to show how folk labels of speech acts and speech genres characteristic of a given language reflect salient features of the culture associated with that language, and how the use of the proposed semantic metalanguage, derived from natural language, helps to achieve the desired double goal of insight and rigor in this area of study. (Speech acts, speech genres, semantics, lexicography, language and culture)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 491 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. (1964). Deep down in the jungle …Hatboro, Penn.: Folklore Associates.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. (1970). Rapping and capping: Black talk as art. In Szwed, J. (ed), Black Americans. New York: Basic Books. 143–53.Google Scholar
Abrahams, R. (1974). Black talking on the street. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the efhnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press. 240–62.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1979). Genry reĉi. In Bakhtin, M., Estetika slovesnogo tvorĉstva. Moscow: Isskusstvo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1981). Poison to your soul. Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton. 69–91.Google Scholar
Deakin, G. (1982). The semantics of intonation: A study of some English speech acts. MA thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Fraser, B., Rintell, E., & Walters, J. (1980). An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed), Discourse analysis in second language research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 75–91.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1972). Introduction. In Gumperz & Hymes 1972. 1–25.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (eds.) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, S. I. (1968). Funk & Wagnalls modern guide to synonyms and related words. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S., Gatenby, E. V., & Wakefield, H. (1969). The advanced learner's dictionary of current English. 2nd ed.Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (1985). Selected speech act verbs in Walmatjari. In Hutton, G. & Gregerson, K. (eds.), Pragmatics in non-Western perspective. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 63–83.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. & Sturtevant, W. (eds.), Anthropology and human behavior. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington. 15–53.Google Scholar
Reprinted in Fishman, J. (ed), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton, 1968. 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1971). Sociolinguistics and the ethnography of speaking. In Ardener, E. (ed.), Social anthropology and language. London: Tavistock. 47–93.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz & Hymes 1972. 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insults. In Sudnow, D. (ed), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 120–69.Google Scholar
Reprinted in Labov, W., Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Locke, J. [1690]). An essay concerning human understanding, Ed. by Alexander, Campbell Frazer. New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzrow, M., & Wolfe, B. (1969). Really the blues. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1972). Signifying and marking: Two Afro-American speech acts. In Gumperz & Hymes 1972. 161–79.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. (1972). Human relations in Japan. Japan: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Neville, A. (1981). A comparison of selected speech acts in Japanese and English. BA(Hons) thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
The Oxford English dictionary. (1933). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society II:203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1974). Namakke, sunmakke, kormakke: Three types of Cuna speech events. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press. 263–82.Google Scholar
SJP, – Stownik języka Polskiego. (1958). (A dictionary of the Polish language) Doroszewski, W., ed. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1970). Conventions and the understanding of speech acts. The Philosophical Quarterly 20:118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1979). What people say they do with words. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1972). Semantic primitives. Frankfurt: Athenaum.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1974) The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics 3/4:267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1976). In defense of you and me. In Jachnow, H. & Girke, W. (eds.), Theoretische Linguistik in Osteuropa. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag. 1–21.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1979). Ethnosyntax and the philosophy of grammar. Studies in Language 3:313–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1980a). The case for surface case. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1980b). Lingua Mentalis. New York and Sydney: Academic.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1982). Why can you have a drink when you can't have an eat? Language 58(4):753–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (in press a). The semantics of the internal dative. A rejoinder. Quaderni di Semantica.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (in press b). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: English vs. Polish. Journal of Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (in press c). Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (in press d). Human emotions: Universal or culture-specific? American Anthropologist.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (forthcoming). A dictionary of English speech act verbs. New York and Sydney: Academic.Google Scholar
Witigenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar