No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Sabrina Billings, Language, globalization and the making of a Tanzanian beauty queen. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2014. Pp.viii, 222. Pb. $49.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
REFERENCES
Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billings, S. (2006). Speaking beauties: Language use and linguistic ideologies in Tanzanian beauty pageants. Unpublished PhD dissertation, the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Billings, S. (2009). Speaking beauties: Linguistic posturing, language inequality, and the construction of a Tanzanian beauty queen. Language in Society 38:581–606.Google Scholar
Billings, S. (2011a). “And the winner is…”: Hierarchies of language competence and fashion sense in Tanzanian beauty pageants. Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture 8:1–32.Google Scholar
Billings, S. (2011b). “Education is the key of life”: Language, schooling, and gender in Tanzanian beauty pageants. Language & Communication 31: 295–309.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication 25:197–216.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. (2009). English as a local language: Post-colonial identities and multilingual practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ivanova, O. (2015). The politics of knowledge in youth education about reproductive health in Tanzania, Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. D. (2011). Zanzibari women's discursive and sexual agency: Violating gendered speech prohibitions through talk about supernatural sex. Discourse & Society 22: 3–20.Google Scholar