Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:20:02.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repair in membership categorization in French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2008

GENEVIÈVE MAHEUX-PELLETIER  and
ANDREA GOLATO
GENEVIÈVE MAHEUX-PELLETIER
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, 200 Old Arts Building, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2E6, [email protected]
ANDREA GOLATO*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2090 FLB, 707 S. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, [email protected]
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to the second author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using conversation analysis as methodology, this article provides a link between the local organization of talk and larger societal issues by investigating specific conversational sequences in which French speakers from different speech communities interact. It is argued that in addition to dealing with problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding, repair can simultaneously be used to negotiate linguistic membership. Repair can be used to establish, confirm, or insist on speakers' belonging to one particular speech community over another. Moreover, participants can use repair to express affiliation and disaffiliation with each other. The implications of this research are discussed, linking the organization of conversation with issues of language and identity, specifically with the social meaning of dialect variety in the Francophone world. Thus, this article demonstrates how phenomena commonly discussed on the macro level are realized and negotiated on the micro level.

Keywords

conversation analysisrepaircross-linguistic analysismembership categorizationidentityvarieties of French
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , November 2008 , pp. 689 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Jeffrey C.; Giesen, Bernhard; Münch, Richard; & Smelser, Neil J. (eds.) (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Heritage, John (eds.) (1984). Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16:645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y. (1997). Language policies and language attitudes: Le monde de la francophonie. In Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland& Adam (eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader and coursebook, 306–22. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrick, Maeve (2002). French in the Americas. In Sahli, Kamal (ed.), French in and out of France, 237–63. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
de Fornel, Michel, & Léon, Jacqueline (2000). L'analyse de conversation, de l'ethnométhodologie à la linguistique interactionnelle. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 22:131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28:69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria (1997). Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multiperson conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 27:611–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria (2004). Other-initiated repair and membership categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1467–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Donald G. (1999). Research on social interaction and the micro–macro issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Cynthia A. (1995). On maintaining a francophone identity in Cohoes, NY. French Review 69:264–74.Google Scholar
Fox, Cynthia A. (2002). Incorporating variation in the French classroom. In Gass, Susan, Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, Magnan, Sally Sieloff, & Walz, Joel (eds.), Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching, 201–19. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francard, Michel (1993). L'insécurité linguistique en communauté française de Belgique. Collection Français et Société 6. Bruxelle, Belgium: Service de la langue française.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1987). Codeswitching and consciousness in the European periphery. American Ethnologist 14:637–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea, & Fagyal, Zsuzsanna (2008). Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1990). Interstitial argument. In Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.), Conflict talk, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). He-said-she-said. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gueunier, Nicole; Genouvrier, Emile; & Khomsi, Abdelhamid (1983). Les Français devant la norme. In Bédard, Edith & Marais, Jaque (eds.), La norme linguistique, 763–87. Québec: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
Gülich, Elizabeth., & Mondada, Lorenza (1995). Konversationsanalyse. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, E. (1993). Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence. Pragmatics 3:411–23.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology 10:163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Léon, Pierre R. (2000). Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Lodge, Anthony R. (1991). Authority, prescriptivism, and the French standard language. Journal of French Language Studies 1:93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève (2006). Face-to-face interaction in the multilingual workplace: Linguistic, social, and political aspects of language use in Montréal. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève, & Golato, Andrea. (2003). Repair mechanisms in French conversation: When repair deals with linguistic pluralism. Poster presented at the 8th International Pragmatics Conference, Toronto, Canada, July 13–18, 2003.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny (2005). Dealing delicately with delicate matters: Embedded self-correction as a method for removing possibly available unwanted hearings. Paper presented at International at the 9th International Pragmatics Conference in Riva del Garda, Italy, July 10–15, 2005.Google Scholar
Martel, Pierre, & Cajolet-Laganière, Helene (1995). Oui … au français québécois standard. Interface 16:14–25.Google Scholar
Mayes, Patricia (2005). Linking micro and macro social structure through genre analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38:331–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Michael (1988). Talking culture. Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (1999). L'organisation séquentielle des ressources linguistiques dans l'élaboration collective des descriptions. Langage et société 89:9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2001). Gestion du topic et organisation de la conversation. Cadernos des estudios linguisticos 41:7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, & Dubois, Danièle (1995). Construction des objets de discours et catégorisation: Une approche des processus de référenciation. Tranel 23:273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relieu, Marc, & Brock, Franck (1995). L'infrastructure conversationnelle de la parole publique. Politix 31:77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1979). Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In Psathas, George (ed.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use, 7–14. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. Jefferson, Gail (ed.), introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987a). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In Alexandro, Jeffrey C. et al. (eds.), The micro-macro link, 207–34. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1987b). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organization. In Button, Graham & Lee, John R. E. (eds.), Talk and social organization, 70–85. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007a). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007b). Tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39:462–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2005). Talk and practical epistemology: The social life of knowledge in a Caribbean community. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30:260–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen (1999). Research on Language and Social Interaction in 1999: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Louise (1990). Attitudes linguistiques et perception sociale de variables phonétiques. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliquée 9:197–221.Google Scholar
Wong, Jean (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics 21:244–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Towards an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist 12:738–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar