Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:29:08.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational practice in the workplace: Women's talk or gendered discourse?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2004

JANET HOLMES  and
MEREDITH MARRA
JANET HOLMES
Affiliation:
School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand, [email protected]
MEREDITH MARRA
Affiliation:
School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the concept of relational practice, the wide range of off-line, backstage, or collaborative work that people do which goes largely unrecognized and unrewarded in the workplace (Fletcher 1999). The analysis identifies a range of different ways in which people do relational practice in workplace discourse, and critically examines the proposal that, as subtle support work, relational practice is considered “women's work.” Drawing on the large Wellington Language in the Workplace database, it explores a variety of ways in which such relational work is manifested in workplace discourse; the analysis focuses on specific instances of relational practice, illustrating how such support work is backgrounded and typically discounted in New Zealand workplaces. The implications of the analysis for the gender/power dynamic are explored. Discussed in particular is the hypothesis that manifestations of relational practice differ in distinct communities of practice, and the validity of the equation of relational practice with “feminized” discourse is questioned.This article is based on a plenary paper presented at IGALA2, the second International Gender and Language Conference, held at Lancaster University in April 2002. It has benefited from comments received there as well as from other colleagues. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and to the editor for helpful suggestions for improving it. We express our appreciation to other members of the Language in the Workplace team who have been involved with the project's development, data collection, processing, and transcription, including Maria Stubbe (research fellow), Bernadette Vine (corpus manager), and a number of research assistants. We also thank those who allowed their workplace interactions to be recorded. This research is supported by a grant from the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology. More information on the project can be viewed on our website, 〈www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/lwp〉.

Keywords

Genderdiscourseworkplace communicationpowerrelational practice
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 377 - 398
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, Dominique M. (1999). Managing discourse, self and others: Women in senior management positions. Dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Nepean.
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, Deborah (2003). Gender and language ideologies. In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), Handbook of language and gender, 447–67. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRef
Coates, Jennifer (1996). Women talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cox, Joe A.; Read, Raymond L.; & Van Auken, Philip M. (1990). Male-female differences in communicating job-related humor: An exploratory study. Humor 3:287–95.Google Scholar
Crawford, Mary (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London & Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Crawford, Mary, & Gressley, Diane (1991). Creativity, caring and context: Women's and men's accounts of humor preferences and practices. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15:217–31.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (2003). Language and gender: The social construction of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Fletcher, Joyce K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Hay, Jennifer (1994). Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 26–55.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer (1995). Gender and humor: Beyond a joke. M.A. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Herbert, Robert K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society 19:201–24.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 445–465.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, Janet (2000a). Victoria University of Wellington's Language in the Workplace project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 1.
Holmes, Janet (2000b). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In Justine Coupland (ed.), Small talk, 32–61. London: Longman.
Holmes, Janet (2000c). Politeness, power and provocation: How humor functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2:159–85.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (2000d). Women at work: Analysing women's talk in New Zealand workplaces. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 22:1–17.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (2003). Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace. To appear in Helga Kotthoff (ed.), Journal of Pragmatics: special issue on humor.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Marra, Meredith (2001). The place of identity construction in workplace narratives. Paper presented at New Zealand Linguistics Society Conference, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 30 August–1 September 2001.
Holmes, Janet, & Marra, Meredith (2002a). Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor 15:1–23.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Marra, Meredith (2002b). Having a laugh at work: How humor contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1683–1710.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet; Marra, Meredith; & Burns, Louise (2001). Women's humor in the workplace: A quantitative analysis. Australian Journal of Communication 28:83–108.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, & Meyerhoff, Miriam (2003a). Different voices, different views: An introduction to current research in language and gender. In Holmes &Meyerhoff (eds.), 1–17.
Holmes, Janet, & Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.) (2003b). Handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmes, Janet, & Stubbe, Maria (2001). Managing conflict at work. Paper presented at Colloquium on Researching the Discourse of Workplace and Professional Settings, AAAL 200, St. Louis, Missouri.
Holmes, Janet, & Stubbe, Maria (2003). “Feminine” workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In Holmes & Meyerhoff (eds.).CrossRef
Johnson, Donna M., & Roen, Duane H. (1992). Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: gender variation. Language in Society 21:27–57.Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari (2003). Creating demeanours of authority at work and home. In Holmes & Meyerhoff (eds.), 600–23.
Kiesling, Scott (2001). “Now I gotta watch what I say”: Shifting constructions of gender and dominance in discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11:250–73.Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad (1991). Sporting formulae in New Zealand English: Two models of male solidarity. In Jenny Cheshire (ed.), English around the world, 200–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Lakoff, Robin (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.
Lenk, Uta (1998). Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30:245–57.Google Scholar
Marra, Meredith (forthcoming). Decisions in New Zealand business meetings. Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Miller, Jean B. (1986). Towards a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
Miller, Jean B., & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Stubbe, Maria (1998). Researching language in the workplace: A participatory model. Proceedings of the Australian Linguistics Society Conference, Brisbane University of Queensland, July 1998. http://english.uq.edu.au/linguistics/als/als98/.
Stubbe, Maria (1999). Just joking and playing silly buggers: Humor and teambuilding on a factory production line. Paper presented at New Zealand Linguistics Society Conference, Massey University, 24–26 November 1999.
Stubbe, Maria (2000). “Just do it … !”: Discourse strategies for ‘getting the message across’ in a factory production team. Proceedings of the Australian Linguistics Society Conference, University of Western Australia, September 1999. http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/LingWWW/als99/.
Stubbe, Maria; Holmes, Janet; Vine, Bernadette; & Marra, Meredith (2000). Forget Mars and Venus, let's get back to Earth: Challenging stereotypes in the workplace. In Janet Holmes (ed.), Gendered speech in social context: Perspectives from gown and town, 231–58. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Talbot, Mary (2003). Gender stereotypes: Reproduction and challenge. In Holmes &Meyerhoff (eds.), 468–86.CrossRef