Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:35:26.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter Trudgill, Dialects in contact (Language in Society 10). Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell, 1986. Pp. viii + 174.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

John R. Rickford
John R. Rickford
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 268 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). The nature of a creole continuum. Language 49:640–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, C. (1988). Variation studies in Great Britain. American Speech 63:76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15:87–105.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al. (eds.), Measurement and prediction. New York: Wiley. 60–90.Google Scholar
Guy, G. R. (in press). Saliency and the direction of syntactic change. Language.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971). Introduction to Part III, General Conceptions of Process. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 65–90.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Naro, A. J. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57:63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, J. (1980). Implicational scales and English dialectology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. (1988). Decreolization paths for Guyanese singular pronouns. In Gilbert, G. (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics: Essays in Honor of John E. Reinecke. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 130–38.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed.New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Steinsholt, A. (1962). Målbryting i hedrum. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983a). On dialect. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. [1974] (1983b). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Rev. ed. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar